Irrelevance of liberal, socialist and communist ideals in the modern world.
- Thread starter Eventhorizon
- Start date
There is an equal number of pro-war people who are republicans and democrats, in my opinion. It's like the mafia... there are two heads of family, but at the end of the day, they're all the mafia. The only way to get an anti-war candidate elected is to vote for some third party. For example, Libertarian Gary Johnson didn't know where Aleppo is, and his policy was "no foreign entanglements," so I suppose he wouldn't have hurt anyone as a result.Whoever campaigns on abolishing the Federal Reserve has my vote. But because the elections are rigged, the third parties don't get featured in the debates, which means that my vote doesn't matter, and neither does yours. So let's stop turning this thread into a civil war, because we're all powerless, and we need to band together as neighbors in the event of some false flag. The phony terrorism is starting to annoy me because it's so obviously a staged bunch of events when you watch TV news.
I think it's pretty hilarious that you are trying to fix the broken system by using the broken system, all while simultaneously declaring our powerlessness. "...band together in the event of some false flag..." sounds great, there's a false flag every news cycle so there will be a lot of opportunity there. Just being annoyed at phony terror seems like an inappropriate response, that probably is why you are so powerless. Let those INFJ emotions go to work!
You honestly do not see the inherent violence in a joke like this? You are either lying, will fully ignorant, broken or stupid. Take your pick.
Absolutely funny gif. The fact you are trying to use it to suggest some sort of link to violence? Funnier. Thanks for the laugh today stu.
I find it to be hilarious.
It will never happen, I doubt it could happen even if someone wanted it to. Therefore it's funny.
However if Trump showed a video of him driving over ol' Hillary in a car. I might see that as violent.
However I've always had a dark sense of humor anyway.
You state that the gif is not inherently violent because the imagery does not have a significant probability of occurring. That is a moronic statement. When white supremacists posted imagery of Obama being lynched the violence in the imagery was not disputed despite the very low likelihood that the event depicted could occur. Likewise with the image of the comedian who posted a picture of her holding Trumps bloody and severed head. I think "stupid" fits because it really does explain your consistent knack for not realizing when you are WRONG no matter what level of evidence proving it is presented to you.
Well, lynching is not funny nor is it anything like being hit with a golf ball. The likeyhood of being killed by a golf ball is pretty damn small and if it were to happen it would be an accident. Even the best pros would have a hard time trying to hit someone with a golf ball on purpose.
For as much as Obama disgusts me for being the biggest anti-American Cra p that he is, depicting him being lynched is even more anti-American. Nothing funny about that type of imagery happening to anyone.
Nothing funny about holding anyone's severed head ISIS style either.
It's all idiotic. Trump's an idiot. Kathy Griffith is an idiot... The racists who depicted Obama that way are idiots. It is the dawn of Idiocracy. No one should take us seriously anymore.
[EHmode]Let's be real about which political party routinely uses the imagery, language and threat of violence as a means to an end , never mind openly wooing violent extremists into their midst.
[Snepmode]
What I really mean, but phrased by a much brighter guy
Last edited:
https://media.giphy.com/media/3orieUEbfAdo547RpS/giphy.gif
You mean like Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem? In a formal axiomatic system, there will always be contradictions; the government cannot solve the problems caused by the government.
Come with us to Ti wonderland.
No that's the other T. Mr. T.
Trump is draining the swamp.
I'm beginning to doubt your alleged occupation if you think that there are any other more "appropriate responses."
Who cares?
You can only muster mild annoyance at terrorists.