Irrelevance of liberal, socialist and communist ideals in the modern world. | Page 7 | INFJ Forum

Irrelevance of liberal, socialist and communist ideals in the modern world.

Maybe it's not mental masturbation... Because at least with mental masturbation there's intellectual stimulation going on. But whatever it is, it's just saying the same old thing over and over again without any desire to actually learn anything or engage... Maybe it's mental fondling yourself through your pants or mental Donald Trump/Rush Limbaugh leg humping with the inability to climax... Yes, @Milktoast Bandit... You may be onto something...

tenor.gif
Mmmmhmmm.
What do you call then reading the same thing again and again?
I'm thinking you secretly like what I post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BritNi
Bullshit, except of course if you limit your news intake to the right wing sites which focus exclusively on the actions of a super minority of those holding non-rightwing positions. The right in this country is WAY more violent and prone to using violent verbiage in its discourse. The fact that they accuse those who oppose them of the behavior they are most known for is the most telling fact
View attachment 37345
Eh? 600gs paid out just for security so that someone can talk?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BritNi
While he's gearing up and arming himself for a civil war against liberals because the NRA and all the right wing pundits say so. Totally non violent thoughts going on there.

Well look at his sources.
Last article was from Fox News.
(Not that Yahoo is great...but seriously...how fucking one-sided, put on your horse-blinders everyone - the white people are going to discuss how racism has affected their poor unprivileged lives...boo-hoo-hoo...white pride snowflakes.)

Fox News's Sean Hannity Gathers Panel of White People to Discuss Racism

b330295abec49af6317d0ca2a199aba3

Screen Shot 2017-09-15 at 10.58.22 AM.png
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-apos-sean-hannity-200207735.html
 
Mmmmhmmm.
What do you call then reading the same thing again and again?
I'm thinking you secretly like what I post.
Its almost every other post you make. Personally, I don't like blocking people either. I think the best course of action is to continue to call it what it is. A one man right wing jerk off. I think there are plenty of places for you to sound off in your own echo chamber, yet you do it here. Maybe you like what some of us libs here are saying? It's OK if you do.. Blink twice if you need help and slowly turn the dial off on Rush.
 
Its almost every other post you make. Personally, I don't like blocking people either. I think the best course of action is to continue to call it what it is. A one man right wing jerk off. I think there are plenty of places for you to sound off in your own echo chamber, yet you do it here. Maybe you like what some of us libs here are saying? It's OK if you do.. Blink twice if you need help and slowly turn the dial off on Rush.
I don't listen to Rush. I did briefly but found he was saying little that I wasn't already thinking. In some instances I simply did not agree.
I don't like what liberal leaning people say for the most part but I do listen because I want to know how someone can have a vastly skewed perception of reality. I still believe theres a blend of information and the way it's presented that will allow them to see just how completely and foundationally wrong they are.
I don't call liberals jerk offs, I'm not that uncouth. But I will call out their hypocrisy when I see it. I will call them violent when that's what they display.
I do make posts here to get responses and sometimes I do it just to let off steam from having been bombard with bs and lies from the liberal media. I do refrain quite a bit. If I didn't there would be pages and pages from me on a daily basis.
Thanks for caring enough to comment in the thread I created on the post I made in the thread I created.
Now go work on that anger you have displayed here. Maybe if you try long enough and hard enough you can turn it into the violence we see from other liberals....if that's what you aspire to.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BritNi
I don't listen to Rush. I did briefly but found he was saying little that I wasn't already thinking. In some instances I simply did not agree.
I don't like what liberal leaning people say for the most part but I do listen because I want to know how someone can have a vastly skewed perception of reality. I still believe theres a blend of information and the way it's presented that will allow them to see just how completely and foundationally wrong they are.
I don't call liberals jerk offs, I'm not that uncouth. But I will call out their hypocrisy when I see it. I will call them violent when that's what they display.
I do make posts here to get responses and sometimes I do it just to let off steam from having been bombard with bs and lies from the liberal media. I do refrain quite a bit. If I didn't there would be pages and pages from me on a daily basis.
Thanks for caring enough to comment in the thread I created on the post I made in the thread I created.
Now go work on that anger you have displayed here. Maybe if you try long enough and hard enough you can turn it into the violence we see from other liberals....if that's what you aspire to.
You just say we are violent and have a "vastly skewed perception of reality." I really think it is you with the taste for violence. You seem to project it a lot onto others; liberals. You are so angry and terrified at god knows what that you are looking for things to culminate into a bloody civil war... You are wanting that violence. Not liberals. Not anyone else here. Not the "liberal media." A bloody civil war in which you delude yourself into believing you will be a survivor because everyone else is too stupid. It's a really twisted narrative that you've allowed yourself to be sucked into and you try to perpetuate it here. It's really a tiring schtick and unfortunately it does span multiple threads.
 
Last edited:
You just say we are violent and have a "vastly skewed perception of reality." I really think it is you with the taste for violence. You seem to project it a lot onto others; liberals. You are so angry and terrified at god knows what that you are looking for things to culminate into a bloody civil war... You are calling for that. Not liberals. Not anyone else here. Not the "liberal media." A bloody civil war in which you delude yourself into believing you will be a survivor because everyone else is too stupid. It's a really twisted narrative that you've allowed yourself to be sucked into and you try to perpetuate it. It's really a tiring schtick and unfortunately it does span multiple threads.
No I am certainly not calling for a civil war and I have said that many times here. The push liberals are making is shoving the country that direction though. They are the cause of it. Violent protests on their part is just more kindling to the fire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BritNi
No I am certainly not calling for a civil war and I have said that many times here. The push liberals are making is shoving the country that direction though. They are the cause of it. Violent protests on their part is just more kindling to the fire.
There have been a loooooot of protests since Trump was elected and the fabric of society is not breaking down. The women's March after the inauguration was one of the biggest and there wasn't violence there.. You get a hair up your ass because AntiFA shows up to a white supremacist rally and the left are all violent.... And i don't recall seeing anywhere where you take issue with one of the white supremacists running down and killing a counter protestor, though. Yeah, it is aggravating to read your posts day in and day out because you are so programmed by a narrative that you can't even look at anything objectively. Everyone not on your side of your ideology is perceived as your enemy. You perpetuate the same lies and propaganda about people who are liberals being violent.
 
There have been a loooooot of protests since Trump was elected and the fabric of society is not breaking down. The women's March after the inauguration was one of the biggest and there wasn't violence there.. You get a hair up your ass because AntiFA shows up to a white supremacist rally and the left are all violent.... And i don't recall seeing anywhere where you take issue with one of the white supremacists running down and killing a counter protestor, though. Yeah, it is aggravating to read your posts day in and day out because you are so programmed by a narrative that you can't even look at anything objectively. Everyone not on your side of your ideology is perceived as your enemy. You perpetuate the same lies and propaganda about people who are liberals being violent.
It would probably take me an hour to address all of the fallacies in your post. Why would I? It would be like me accusing you of being Satan. No truth to it whatsoever so what do you do? List all the ways you are not Satan?
Your mind has given you a fantasy world to live in because it's more comfortable than starting to think you are the one who isn't thinking clearly if at all.
I'm not programmed in the slightest. My mind is fully and completely my own. That would be difficult for a majority to say I think.
I don't have any enemies except self proclaimed enemies and myself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BritNi
It would probably take me an hour to address all of the fallacies in your post. Why would I? It would be like me accusing you of being Satan. No truth to it whatsoever so what do you do? List all the ways you are not Satan?
Your mind has given you a fantasy world to live in because it's more comfortable than starting to think you are the one who isn't thinking clearly if at all.
I'm not programmed in the slightest. My mind is fully and completely my own. That would be difficult for a majority to say I think.
I don't have any enemies except self proclaimed enemies and myself.

And here you do what you always do.
Typical fashion.
You have a predictable pattern.

You post opinion pieces, you discount facts, you constantly berate liberals (the name of the thread) and clearly hate them.
When someone has a different opinion than you, or shows you factual data proving you are incorrect you ignore it or can’t be bothered to read it or address all the fallacies you find - it’s always too inconvenient for you.
So instead you call names or insult their intelligence.
You constantly think you are pointing out hypocrisy when you yourself are a walking, talking, uber-hypocrite.
You tell people they don’t live in reality.
That only you are the one who lives there.
Only your opinion is correct.
Only your facts and sources count.

You clearly wish you could hurt or injure liberals, and have no issue restricting their rights.
You take pleasure in seeing them hurt by cops or otherwise, and crack jokes about people being hurt in videos posted.
And still you haven’t said anything about the young woman killed or denounced that one bit.
You always make sure to let people know that they can’t tell you what to do, that you are mentaly "free", but then you turn around and tell them what they should or shouldn't do.

You are not the smartest person on the forum.
Not even close.

Any normal person would be against Nazis and the KKK, and hateful rhetoric against minorities or Jews.
Instead you defend their right to free hate speech.
Way to make a difference in the world!
That certainly is a positive cause to take up.
Make sure that hate speech is protected.
ANY other cause would be better.
Starving kids...whatever.
“Well, I don’t like it either, but that’s how it is.” you say.
Pretty sure you do like it.
I think you are a white supremacist or at least are a sympathizer to their cause.

I guess liberals are far more dangerous than Nazis and the KKK.
As far as Antifa goes - just about everyone here besides you has condemned violence on BOTH sides.

Everyone except you.
 
Last edited:
Eh? 600gs paid out just for security so that someone can talk?
UC Berkerely, a state University has 40,000 students and is in a major city. It routinely hosts and has hosted speakers of all stripes. Lets look at the largest conservative State University in the nation, say Mississippi State University, very conservative state, very conservative student population. Who are they hosting and what can we derive from the comparison as far a free speech and free exchange of "uncomfortable" ideas?

Untitled.jpg
 
Last edited:
Maybe it's not mental masturbation... Because at least with mental masturbation there's intellectual stimulation going on. But whatever it is, it's just saying the same old thing over and over again without any desire to actually learn anything or engage... Maybe it's mental fondling yourself through your pants or mental Donald Trump/Rush Limbaugh leg humping with the inability to climax... Yes, @Milktoast Bandit... You may be onto something...

tenor.gif
I'm so turned on rn. *humps rush limbaugh*
 
Seriously though, what's so bad about being violent? Violence is how we founded America, the greatest nation on earth.
 
Seriously though, what's so bad about being violent? Violence is how we founded America, the greatest nation on earth.
Ok. Then the spoils go to the victor. In that scenario I am fine with the outcome. So, bring on the ultraviolence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BritNi and the
Let's be real about which political party routinely uses the imagery, language and threat of violence as a means to an end , never mind openly wooing violent extremists into their midst.
anigif_sub-buzz-6907-1505652898-30.gif
 
Let's be real about which political party routinely uses the imagery, language and threat of violence as a means to an end , never mind openly wooing violent extremists into their midst.
anigif_sub-buzz-6907-1505652898-30.gif
Absolutely funny gif. The fact you are trying to use it to suggest some sort of link to violence? Funnier. Thanks for the laugh today stu.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BritNi
Absolutely funny gif. The fact you are trying to use it to suggest some sort of link to violence? Funnier. Thanks for the laugh today stu.
I wish we could still give thumbs down.
 
There is an equal number of pro-war people who are republicans and democrats, in my opinion. It's like the mafia... there are two heads of family, but at the end of the day, they're all the mafia. The only way to get an anti-war candidate elected is to vote for some third party. For example, Libertarian Gary Johnson didn't know where Aleppo is, and his policy was "no foreign entanglements," so I suppose he wouldn't have hurt anyone as a result. :smiley: Whoever campaigns on abolishing the Federal Reserve has my vote. But because the elections are rigged, the third parties don't get featured in the debates, which means that my vote doesn't matter, and neither does yours. So let's stop turning this thread into a civil war, because we're all powerless, and we need to band together as neighbors in the event of some false flag. The phony terrorism is starting to annoy me because it's so obviously a staged bunch of events when you watch TV news. :angry:
 
  • Like
Reactions: BritNi