- MBTI
- INFJ again
- Enneagram
- 4w5
Hi guys I'm back
with a question
I usually type as INFP but I'm starting to wonder if I'm not an ISTJ instead. I know they almost seem like opposites but they share the same cognitive functions
INFP: FiNeSiTe
ISTJ: SiTeFiNe
In my spare time I seem to act more like an INFP while at work, when I'm in the outside world, I act more like an ISTJ.
At work I'm organized. I need to have a clear outline of what I have to do. If I don't know what is expected of me, how can I do a good job? I like new experiences and learn new things but they also scare me. If I'm thrown in a new situation without clear guidance I tend to stress out and become even more organized and scheduled. I like to make charts, tables, graphts. When things are getting to complex, charts help me to make things clearer, see patterns, find loopholes, ... At work I'm appreciated for my organization skills
But as much as I'm organized in the outside world, as messy I am in my private life. My head is a mess, I don't like to be tied to schedules or obligated tasks. Unless things are getting out of hands. For instance when I have so many appointments to remember, only then will I start to write them down in an agenda. But as soon as things are manageable again, I'll spontaneously stop keeping an agenda.
Lenore says that introverted judgers are organized on the outside and messy on the inside while perceivers are the opposite. She also says that the secondary function is something we can only use when we put our minds to it but we tend to be good at it. For me then Te would be my secondary function and I would be a judger --> ISTJ
INFP's are considered to be creative and a bit eccentric. I'm not at all. I like to think that I'm creative, but I'm really not. I'm a scientist but at work I'm not known for my creativity, thinking outside the box, intuition, ... in the contrary, I'm known for my consistency, accuracy, reproducibility. I would do an experiment at least twice before making conclusions. I want to be sure that the experiment was done in a proper way before I can trust the results, and even then.
INFP's are considered to be intuitive, to know when something is good or wrong. I thought I had that quality too but lately I'm wondering if I not just misunderstood the concept. I can sense when something is off but it seems like I know this because it is different from past experiences. In that case my sense don't come from my intuition but from Si. I compare the current situation with past similar situations and notice the differences. I think in one way I like the world to be predictable. I collect experiences to know in the future what I can expect and how to react when a similar situation appears. This mostly counts for stressfull situations when I'm expected to react in a certain way: job interviews, interaction with collegues, taking the plane, ...
On the other hand Si dominants are considered to be walking databases. I'm not like that, not at all, I have a terrible memory, I don't like facts for facts, I can't remember names, details or make a perfect recollection of an event. I rather remember how I felt, smelled, images that I can put together and rebuilt the situation from scratch. They are also considered to put themselves to a goal, a hobby and go for it completely. I don't put that much of effort in things. I have had so many hobbies and I'm moderate good in all of them but there is not a single hobby or goal that can adsorb all my attention and energy. I would be affraid to miss things. There are so many things to do, to see, to learn that I wouldn't like to pin myself down to only one of them. So that would make me not an ISTJ
INFP's are considered to be highly idealistic and have a strong opinion about what is good and wrong. I was like that when I was little, had a huge sense of justice and will to improve the world. Now not so much anymore. I also believe that you can't pin down what is good or bad. there are always two sides to a coin. Something can be good for one person but bad for an other. Every story has many viewpoints and I like to explore all of them instead of pin myself down to one of them. It is better to be open minded.
an other reason for me to think I'm not ISTJ is that I don't like rules as much as ISTJ's. Rules are only there to make the world more manageable but that is it. I can make rules for others to follow but I have a hard time imposing them on others. I would never say "you have to do this because it is the rule", I would rather say "I want to remind you that the rules say that you have to do this because these and these reasons, but it is your choice to follow it or not. If I don't see a clear, valid reason for a rule, I'm not likely to live by it.
And also ISTJ's are considered to be not so emotional while I'm really really emotional and sensitve and I take everything personal. I can get hurt by almost anything and I cry for almost anything. My life seems to be built around my emotions. The INFP child is exactly who i was when growing up while the ISTJ child is not. ISTJ child likes practical information, I like more theory. They are more handson while I like fantasy. They like non-fictional books while I get lost in a fantasy story...
the only pattern I can see is that I tend to be more organized/controling (Te) and linger on the past (Si) when I'm in stressful and unknown situations but in situations where I feel secure I'm more inclined to be open minded and stand up for human rights. can it be that I'm an INFP but learned that it is better to use SiTe since my ISTJ father likes that better?

I usually type as INFP but I'm starting to wonder if I'm not an ISTJ instead. I know they almost seem like opposites but they share the same cognitive functions
INFP: FiNeSiTe
ISTJ: SiTeFiNe
In my spare time I seem to act more like an INFP while at work, when I'm in the outside world, I act more like an ISTJ.
At work I'm organized. I need to have a clear outline of what I have to do. If I don't know what is expected of me, how can I do a good job? I like new experiences and learn new things but they also scare me. If I'm thrown in a new situation without clear guidance I tend to stress out and become even more organized and scheduled. I like to make charts, tables, graphts. When things are getting to complex, charts help me to make things clearer, see patterns, find loopholes, ... At work I'm appreciated for my organization skills
But as much as I'm organized in the outside world, as messy I am in my private life. My head is a mess, I don't like to be tied to schedules or obligated tasks. Unless things are getting out of hands. For instance when I have so many appointments to remember, only then will I start to write them down in an agenda. But as soon as things are manageable again, I'll spontaneously stop keeping an agenda.
Lenore says that introverted judgers are organized on the outside and messy on the inside while perceivers are the opposite. She also says that the secondary function is something we can only use when we put our minds to it but we tend to be good at it. For me then Te would be my secondary function and I would be a judger --> ISTJ
INFP's are considered to be creative and a bit eccentric. I'm not at all. I like to think that I'm creative, but I'm really not. I'm a scientist but at work I'm not known for my creativity, thinking outside the box, intuition, ... in the contrary, I'm known for my consistency, accuracy, reproducibility. I would do an experiment at least twice before making conclusions. I want to be sure that the experiment was done in a proper way before I can trust the results, and even then.
INFP's are considered to be intuitive, to know when something is good or wrong. I thought I had that quality too but lately I'm wondering if I not just misunderstood the concept. I can sense when something is off but it seems like I know this because it is different from past experiences. In that case my sense don't come from my intuition but from Si. I compare the current situation with past similar situations and notice the differences. I think in one way I like the world to be predictable. I collect experiences to know in the future what I can expect and how to react when a similar situation appears. This mostly counts for stressfull situations when I'm expected to react in a certain way: job interviews, interaction with collegues, taking the plane, ...
On the other hand Si dominants are considered to be walking databases. I'm not like that, not at all, I have a terrible memory, I don't like facts for facts, I can't remember names, details or make a perfect recollection of an event. I rather remember how I felt, smelled, images that I can put together and rebuilt the situation from scratch. They are also considered to put themselves to a goal, a hobby and go for it completely. I don't put that much of effort in things. I have had so many hobbies and I'm moderate good in all of them but there is not a single hobby or goal that can adsorb all my attention and energy. I would be affraid to miss things. There are so many things to do, to see, to learn that I wouldn't like to pin myself down to only one of them. So that would make me not an ISTJ
INFP's are considered to be highly idealistic and have a strong opinion about what is good and wrong. I was like that when I was little, had a huge sense of justice and will to improve the world. Now not so much anymore. I also believe that you can't pin down what is good or bad. there are always two sides to a coin. Something can be good for one person but bad for an other. Every story has many viewpoints and I like to explore all of them instead of pin myself down to one of them. It is better to be open minded.
an other reason for me to think I'm not ISTJ is that I don't like rules as much as ISTJ's. Rules are only there to make the world more manageable but that is it. I can make rules for others to follow but I have a hard time imposing them on others. I would never say "you have to do this because it is the rule", I would rather say "I want to remind you that the rules say that you have to do this because these and these reasons, but it is your choice to follow it or not. If I don't see a clear, valid reason for a rule, I'm not likely to live by it.
And also ISTJ's are considered to be not so emotional while I'm really really emotional and sensitve and I take everything personal. I can get hurt by almost anything and I cry for almost anything. My life seems to be built around my emotions. The INFP child is exactly who i was when growing up while the ISTJ child is not. ISTJ child likes practical information, I like more theory. They are more handson while I like fantasy. They like non-fictional books while I get lost in a fantasy story...
the only pattern I can see is that I tend to be more organized/controling (Te) and linger on the past (Si) when I'm in stressful and unknown situations but in situations where I feel secure I'm more inclined to be open minded and stand up for human rights. can it be that I'm an INFP but learned that it is better to use SiTe since my ISTJ father likes that better?