Hi!
I was reading an article about INFJs compared to INFPs .
There was said that :
Ni is focused about analyzing one single thing , intepreting every single part of it , and seeing all possible intepretation of it.
Ne instead is seeng all at once searching common things between ideas and different sources
Now , usually Ni is described as convergent thinking and Ne divergent thinking.
Ni is also described as a synthetic function,or unifying the contraddictory.Isn't that similar to the previous Ne description?
What is the difference between ''seeing all at once '' and convergent or synthetic thinking?
I could guess that Ni wants to find a perspective that make different things '' the same thing'' instead Ne wants to create something new or some new way of using it.
So Ni wants to find the ''underlyng principle'' instead Ne wants to see a totally new thing.
I've found a description of Ne (lenore thomson if i'm not wrong , sorry ) in which was said that it wants to find more about the context for a bigger understanding of the part.Instead from what i've grasped of Ni , it is much about changing the understanding of the part to have a different vision of the whole.
Is that right?
I can really relate with this Ni ''decomposing play'',i analyze every single part of topics and view for different intepretations of it, but then i see ''all at once'' , when i synthesize things .... Is that Ni or Ne?
I really need to understand this :help:
Thanks everyone
I was reading an article about INFJs compared to INFPs .
There was said that :
Ni is focused about analyzing one single thing , intepreting every single part of it , and seeing all possible intepretation of it.
Ne instead is seeng all at once searching common things between ideas and different sources
Now , usually Ni is described as convergent thinking and Ne divergent thinking.
Ni is also described as a synthetic function,or unifying the contraddictory.Isn't that similar to the previous Ne description?
What is the difference between ''seeing all at once '' and convergent or synthetic thinking?
I could guess that Ni wants to find a perspective that make different things '' the same thing'' instead Ne wants to create something new or some new way of using it.
So Ni wants to find the ''underlyng principle'' instead Ne wants to see a totally new thing.
I've found a description of Ne (lenore thomson if i'm not wrong , sorry ) in which was said that it wants to find more about the context for a bigger understanding of the part.Instead from what i've grasped of Ni , it is much about changing the understanding of the part to have a different vision of the whole.
Is that right?
I can really relate with this Ni ''decomposing play'',i analyze every single part of topics and view for different intepretations of it, but then i see ''all at once'' , when i synthesize things .... Is that Ni or Ne?
I really need to understand this :help:
Thanks everyone
