[MENTION=11651]Artisan[/MENTION] Riddled with falsehoods and half truths. You accuse me of not checking my sources and believing whatever I heard on television. I'd say the same for you, and I would swear that you are one whose trolling
There are just so many of your so called rebuttals that are plain wrong but lets pick on one shall we?
The one about Robert Byrd. Its true that in his younger years he was a member of the KKK, but in his long tenure in the Senator (as Senator of West Virginia) he completely renounced his formerly racist views. For the 2003–2004 session, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) rated Byrd's voting record as being 100% in line with the N.A.A.C.P.'s position on the thirty-three Senate bills they evaluated. In June 2005, Byrd proposed an additional $10,000,000 in federal funding for the Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial in Washington, D.C., remarking that, "With the passage of time, we have come to learn that his Dream was the American Dream, and few ever expressed it more eloquently" Hardly the views of a white nationalist.
You tell one part of the story, but leave out the other parts.
Also you seem unwilling to face the facts, Emperor Trump has no clothes! You have not challenged this fact at all, while continuing just to attack Hillary, you haven't said why Trump is better than her. The Presidency is not an entry level position, bottom line. For all her flaws, she is more qualified, more experienced and more capable than he is and nothing you have said so far has changed my opinion.
I am not attacking hillary, I simply show when things ain't right and at which points I take issue with her, much like you should do on trump instead starting about intelligence and hillary being the better choice because of all these things that arent true about her.
You might have noticed that I do not dispute points you make against him that are truthful.
Robert Byrd went into politics. Ofc he officially claims that he changed his ways.
Same goes for Clinton our Goldwater girl.
Which is why current KKK heads endorse hillary.
Does that mean that they change however ? or did they simply mask their thoughts on matters to fight the battles when and where they can win ? It's a lot easier to pretend to be something your not if you let money do the talking for you. I'm not a racist, I can't be racist, I just donated to this and that or like mr. Byrd just recommended to give the states money.
The reason my posts always seem to ft. clinton, is because I got an issue with untruths, I primarily call you on it because you keep posting posts favoring clinton with untruths. When you say something that is not correct followed by an indirect statement about intelligence, I cannot help but post, its like you're daring me to call you out on it, it is too appealing.
The way I see it is that there are 3 candidates left. Sanders, Trump and Clinton. The majority of your posts favor clinton. Sanders is not out of the race, you claim to support him but you only mention clinton. You keep using clinton as a shield against trump, but fail to directly point out your issues with trump without facts behind him. The only thing you got is his unpredictable thing. Whilst I agree its a flimsy argument its nothing I don't see hillary do in her own way, which is saying how everyone supports her and what amazing credentials she has. So whilst you claim that I have not said why trump is better than her, you keep failing to point things out against trump that hold actual substance to it.
To me my argument why I like trump better than hillary is rather simple:
- He does not have such an extremely easy to find long trail of lies throughout his career for me to follow as Hillary
- And Hillary voted for, advocated for and/or proposed pretty much everything that I believe is wrong with america today since she entered politics
To me Bernie Sanders makes the most appealing candidate because:
- Hes consistant in what he stands for and I share many of his views
And the reasons I like Both Sanders and Trump,
Both oppose globalist treaties like TTP and TTIP. (
https://www.rt.com/uk/341690-ttip-leak-documents-greenpeace/ so u know what it means) sign here if you're against it and european
https://stop-ttip.org/ )
Both support maintaining or expanding current levels of Social Security benefits.
Both support some upper-income tax hikes.
Both are against money in politics.
Both opposed going to war with Iraq and believe the money would have been better spend domestically.
Both have been known to worry that increased immigration could have a negative effect on working-class wages.
There are just so many of your so called rebuttals that are plain wrong but lets pick on one shall we?
lol. You picked the only one that does not involve hillary directly, You picked the only one that you can reasonably attempt to argue against and you picked the only one that depends on how much you believe a politician can truely change on the inside. No bright, the reason you never really try to oppose any of the things I point out as incorrect in your hillary related statements, is because you simply can't.