Resonance
Community Member
- MBTI
- INfj
- Enneagram
- 5w6 so/sp
tyGiven that universities are where most of the research is funded and conducted, I hope that you have place to work.
tyGiven that universities are where most of the research is funded and conducted, I hope that you have place to work.
I don't want to work on a farm. I want to work in a research laboratory.
yeah, I probably should have specified that I live in Canada, where taxpayers pay 75% of the tuition anyway and the payment plans adjust to your income. So myself I only have to borrow 6 grand a year for tuition (plus another 8 grand for books, living expenses etc.) And because I'm over the age where my parents can be expected to help out, I get a certain portion of it as a grant and then another portion of it voided when I get my degree. All in all I'll likely have about $8-10k of debt per year of school. Easily doable considering it's zero-interest until I get a job (at least for 6 months after graduating) and starting salaries for compsci/psych graduates are in the mid 40s to mid 60s depending on where you look and how hard it is to get.Based on some responses, I'm wondering how many people watched this in its entirety. Anyone note the Dentist who needed to make over $250,000 in a small practice in a rural area of a Midwestern state according to her payment plan? Or the hyper-inflation comment that commits all of us - every single US money holder - to paying back your (current college students) student loans if the sh** hits the fan like it did with real estate? Or the professors telling people to run away from the college paradigm and just start working/investing money?
I must be the only person I've met who refuses to go back for a graduate degree after being accepted to 2 different schools, based on the payment scale after I graduate with said degree. I'd be over $250,000 in debt when all I would want the degree for is to learn and then help benefit others. There's no way a non-profit organization could ever afford to hire me or offer me enough to pay back that level of debt. I don't want to be a scientist, I don't want to be an engineer - I wanted to study, biology, ecology or sociology to use for work in places like The World Wildlife Fund, Greenpeace, World Parrot Trust, National Geographic, etc.
So much for those plans...
Based on some responses, I'm wondering how many people watched this in its entirety. Anyone note the Dentist who needed to make over $250,000 in a small practice in a rural area of a Midwestern state according to her payment plan? Or the hyper-inflation comment that commits all of us - every single US money holder - to paying back your (current college students) student loans if the sh** hits the fan like it did with real estate? Or the professors telling people to run away from the college paradigm and just start working/investing money?
I must be the only person I've met who refuses to go back for a graduate degree after being accepted to 2 different schools, based on the payment scale after I graduate with said degree. I'd be over $250,000 in debt when all I would want the degree for is to learn and then help benefit others. There's no way a non-profit organization could ever afford to hire me or offer me enough to pay back that level of debt. I don't want to be a scientist, I don't want to be an engineer - I wanted to study, biology, ecology or sociology to use for work in places like The World Wildlife Fund, Greenpeace, World Parrot Trust, National Geographic, etc.
So much for those plans...
yeah, I probably should have specified that I live in Canada, where taxpayers pay 75% of the tuition anyway and the payment plans adjust to your income. So myself I only have to borrow 6 grand a year for tuition (plus another 8 grand for books, living expenses etc.) And because I'm over the age where my parents can be expected to help out, I get a certain portion of it as a grant and then another portion of it voided when I get my degree. All in all I'll likely have about $8-10k of debt per year of school. Easily doable considering it's zero-interest until I get a job (at least for 6 months after graduating) and starting salaries for compsci/psych graduates are in the mid 40s to mid 60s depending on where you look and how hard it is to get.
http://money.msn.com/college-savings/is-a-college-degree-worthless-smartmoney.aspx?page=1Degrees are poor proof of learning
Students want jobs and respect. Degrees bring both. Employers, meanwhile, want smart, capable workers. A degree is a decent enough proxy for intelligence, but we want it to be more than that. We want degrees to mean that students have learned the foundations of human knowledge: literature, chemistry, physics, composition, metaphysics, psychology, economics and so on. If we didn't, we'd replace degrees with inexpensive vocational exams.
Charles Murray, a fellow at American Enterprise Institute, calls for just that in a recent book, "Real Education." He argues that too many kids who lack the ability to complete a liberal-arts education are being pushed into four-year liberal-arts schools, because there's a steep societal penalty for not getting a degree. Schools, in turn, have made their degree programs easier. Murray provides a sample of courses that students used to fulfill core degree requirements at major universities in 2004, including History of Comic Book Art (Indiana University), History and Philosophy of Dress (Texas Tech University) and Campus Culture and Drinking (Duke University). He documents not only falling standards but also rampant grade inflation.
He's not alone. In 2005, the Department of Education created a commission to study the college system and recommend reforms. A year later, the Spellings Commission (named for then-Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings) reported a long list of shortcomings, including "a remarkable absence of accountability mechanisms to ensure that colleges succeed in educating students." It found "disturbing signs" that degree earners "have not actually mastered the reading, writing and thinking skills we expect of college graduates." Literacy levels among college graduates, the commission noted, fell sharply over the 12 years ending in 2003.
Loan Cancellation
Federal education loans can be discharged or cancelled in a variety of circumstances. These include:
Closed School Discharge. If the college closed while you were in attendance or up to 90 days after you withdrew.
False Certification Discharge. If the college improperly certified your ability to benefit from a higher education or you are the victim of identity theft.
Death Discharge. If the borrower (or the student on whose behalf a parent borrowed a Federal PLUS loan) dies.
Total and Permanent Disability Discharge. If a doctor certifies that the borrower is totally and permanently disabled, the loan will be subject to a 3-year conditional discharge. At the end of this period the loans may be permanently discharged.
If any of these circumstances apply to your federal loans, contact the servicer to obtain the necessary forms. You can also call the US Department of Education at 1-800-4-FED-AID (1-800-433-3243) or TTY 1-800-730-8913.
[I do not] carry such information in my mind since it is readily available in books. ...The value of a college education is not the learning of many facts but the training of the mind to think. - Albert Einstein
Since the OP says many people in his field are employed without a degree, and that wages have been stagnant, I would think this could qualify as False Certification Discharge, if the school told him he could benefit from a higher education and that turned out to be blatantly false. I don't know for sure, but it would be worth looking into.
This is a dangerous video, because it mixes pertinant facts that people really DO need to know, with a lot of paranoid nonsense. It is true that a college degree is not worth the money you need to get it. But my "nutcase alarm" started going off when they stated things like "Lawyers become Congressmen in order to create bad laws that will provide work for their lawyer friends." Yikes. Basically, there is enough nonsense in this video that it LOSES CREDIBILITY, and so when it does make points that are worth learning, why should we trust them?
The quality of information being conveyed by universities does not seem as high as one would expect. Information may not be going too far down in quality, however one would expect it to be rising exponentially given the apparently scientific (but probably not) method of information processing. As quality falls, eventually people simply move out in mass and eventually new quality is created. Higher education is heading towards this collapse in information quality, however there is still much to be salvaged. Do what you do because you feel you should be doing it, not because others have judged it some particular way.