Does anyone get the idea that if we weren't biologically attracted to the opposite sex, we probably wouldn't have anything to do with them?
Or the opposite, we might get along better?
Or the opposite, we might get along better?
Same as who though? And how do you know that? How are you sure you're not actually doing better then others because you keep it platonic, and detached sexaully?
These are the questions I've been asking myself lately. It isn't nearly as simple as the answer I just recieved.
But I like guys. They're easier to deal with. I have more male friends than I do female friends... always have. I like girls just fine and they like me just fine, but its hard to find other women I really gel with. I'm intimidated by other women... they seem so ...something I'm not. But I'm still fascinated by them. Glad I don't have to date them though. Been there, Done that.
I guess I like everybody then. I don't think its sex that complicates things. But I don't know if that true for most. Sex usually brings clarity for me, in an odd way.
Does anyone get the idea that if we weren't biologically attracted to the opposite sex, we probably wouldn't have anything to do with them?
Or the opposite, we might get along better?
That's the key. Negating the biological attraction undermines the definitions of men and women and their compatibility, so the question is really unanswerable.IAlthough if there wasn't sexual attraction, I'm pretty sure the gender difference would be much less apparent.
That's the key. Negating the biological attraction undermines the definitions of men and women and their compatibility, so the question is really unanswerable.
Oh, I know about asexuals, and that they would lack the bias, but men and women have evolved for sexual reproduction, so even asexuals carry traits that have formed for biological attraction.Well, yes and no...there are asexual folks who exist. At least 1% of the population has no sexual attraction to either sexes, so I guess you can always ask someone who is asexual if they feel there is an actual difference.
As they say... don't hate the player, hate the game.
Word up little homey. Rules that are straightforward and viewable.Games have rules.
Oh, I know about asexuals, and that they would lack the bias, but men and women have evolved for sexual reproduction, so even asexuals carry traits that have formed for biological attraction.
The thing about asexuals is that, even though they lack the gender attraction, they still are subjected to gender stereotyping and social constructs. If everyone were asexual, then those stereotypes would be less needed, and thus no one would feel the pressure towards them; that's when it would be less apparent. However, at the present moment, asexuals are still pushed towards a certain criteria, and although they may be less inclined to subject themselves to that, there's probably still a certain amount that they conform.
Although I have to say, I think sex does play a key role in determining stereotypes, but also prejudices. I think there would be less friction without that attraction.
I should probably move this...