S
I am a little hesitant to call these rights. Maybe "characteristics" or something that doesn't sound so "good" or "bad." I'd say rights are freedoms all humans should have within all social contracts, and privileges as abilities depending on the place within that society.
No I would still say might makes right, if you have a hangup on the word might thats your problem. That same boxer carrying a sawed down shotgun with a hair trigger with thier finger perched on it will be much stronger the you. Might = force. If you are intelligent then you can use that as a method for generating force, a la leading others.
S
Shai Gar
I believe that, logically, might makes right (in the sense that, 'Rights' in this situation means things we ALL have). Morally, I wish everything would have the ability to live and coexist but, the process of living typically involves destroying something else (Unless you go vegetarian, but who's to say vegetables don't have feelings? haha). Other 'typical' universal rights are violated every day. At least the right to use your might is something every individual has to an extent, even working in a corporate society like america or the desert in africa.
1. We'll never escape society.
2. Self-evident is very subjective. For example, see Locke (....life, health, liberty, and possessions....).
S
Shai Gar
What if raping you makes me happy?
What if I rape you, and I want to continue enjoying my Liberty?
What if I rape you, and I want to continue enjoying my Liberty?
But people who are rejected from society because of somekind of reasons, doesn't have this right.
eeeewww, Slant, my opinion about zoophilia is in your thread about zoophilia. Zoophilia isn't a right. It is a perversion! geez.
