sriv
Community Member
- MBTI
- IxTJ
Dear [insert cliche'd woman's name here],
I need some advice. I pose a question: should the truth, without exception, always be told? Here is the scenario.
During a friendly cardgame, I stated this observation to my best friend ENFP, (1), which completely matched the context.
"(1), you would rather hear what you want to hear than the truth."
(1) immediately agreed with me. We continued on playing and he seemed to look bothered. Soon afterward, he turned aggressive. He started insulting me, which he does commonly in good humor, but this time it had a serious tone. I gave no reaction, except laughing here and there at the color and creativity of his various remarks. This did nothing to help the situation. I was mildly surprised that he didn't get loud, as he usually would in a situation that turns out against him. Another friend of us, (2), was there too. He stayed out of the situation [AKA, The Wrath of (1)], but he did agree with Kevin on some things just to get (1) off his back since he was doing something else. (1) prolonged our game and instead of beating me, drew the game out for another 7 minutes although it was evident that he would win no matter what I did and he had the chance to end the game.
My analysis...
His spontaneous reply to my observation showed that he knew that what I said was the truth. Then when he actually started thinking about it, the truth of it shamed him. His natural reaction was to channel all his depression into anger. This he could vent at any target. It only makes sense that he would vent it at me. He drew out the game to dishonor me, even though he knows I do not believe in honor. It was all to make himself feel better (which ironically fits my observation). He would rather illusion himself that he is superior instead of facing the reality of the situation and dealing with it maturely. This does not bother me, what bothers me is that he targeted me to recieve his abuse and now he feels hurt. Considering it rationally, I told the truth and he learned something about himself. The consensus regards this as "good". Considering it emotionally, I indirectly inflicted harm to him and the consensus regards this as "bad". This goes back to the question of whether or not one should tell "the bitter truth".
If it was up to me three weeks ago, I would do it again and again and again. I suffer nothing but theoretical loss of friendship, his verbal abuse has absolutely no effect on me, and he would be learning something. (Note: Learning is one of my purposes of my life, I value it greatly). But now, I feel bad. I feel bad because he has been hurt and he would not be hurt if I hadn't said that. Would I rather destroy someone's ignorance or self-esteem? I feel bad because I know things he doesn't and I lie by omission everyday by not communicating things I should. Maybe I shouldn't bother him; maybe I should find someone else to be my best friend; someone less erratic, someone who understands me more.
[cliche'd woman's name], what do you think?
Right now, I feel like saying to him, "In a few days, you'll vent off all excess emotion and we'll both apologize to each other. Why hurt ourselves by keeping up the unnecessary melodrama and worry?" I have a feeling I shouldn't say that however, because that may be a little too truthful.
It is interesting that (2) did not do anything, I'll have to think that through.
Please give me your opinion with my friend problem. It would be much appreciated.
Anyone else had experience with a similar scenario?
I need some advice. I pose a question: should the truth, without exception, always be told? Here is the scenario.
During a friendly cardgame, I stated this observation to my best friend ENFP, (1), which completely matched the context.
"(1), you would rather hear what you want to hear than the truth."
(1) immediately agreed with me. We continued on playing and he seemed to look bothered. Soon afterward, he turned aggressive. He started insulting me, which he does commonly in good humor, but this time it had a serious tone. I gave no reaction, except laughing here and there at the color and creativity of his various remarks. This did nothing to help the situation. I was mildly surprised that he didn't get loud, as he usually would in a situation that turns out against him. Another friend of us, (2), was there too. He stayed out of the situation [AKA, The Wrath of (1)], but he did agree with Kevin on some things just to get (1) off his back since he was doing something else. (1) prolonged our game and instead of beating me, drew the game out for another 7 minutes although it was evident that he would win no matter what I did and he had the chance to end the game.
My analysis...
His spontaneous reply to my observation showed that he knew that what I said was the truth. Then when he actually started thinking about it, the truth of it shamed him. His natural reaction was to channel all his depression into anger. This he could vent at any target. It only makes sense that he would vent it at me. He drew out the game to dishonor me, even though he knows I do not believe in honor. It was all to make himself feel better (which ironically fits my observation). He would rather illusion himself that he is superior instead of facing the reality of the situation and dealing with it maturely. This does not bother me, what bothers me is that he targeted me to recieve his abuse and now he feels hurt. Considering it rationally, I told the truth and he learned something about himself. The consensus regards this as "good". Considering it emotionally, I indirectly inflicted harm to him and the consensus regards this as "bad". This goes back to the question of whether or not one should tell "the bitter truth".
If it was up to me three weeks ago, I would do it again and again and again. I suffer nothing but theoretical loss of friendship, his verbal abuse has absolutely no effect on me, and he would be learning something. (Note: Learning is one of my purposes of my life, I value it greatly). But now, I feel bad. I feel bad because he has been hurt and he would not be hurt if I hadn't said that. Would I rather destroy someone's ignorance or self-esteem? I feel bad because I know things he doesn't and I lie by omission everyday by not communicating things I should. Maybe I shouldn't bother him; maybe I should find someone else to be my best friend; someone less erratic, someone who understands me more.
[cliche'd woman's name], what do you think?
Right now, I feel like saying to him, "In a few days, you'll vent off all excess emotion and we'll both apologize to each other. Why hurt ourselves by keeping up the unnecessary melodrama and worry?" I have a feeling I shouldn't say that however, because that may be a little too truthful.
It is interesting that (2) did not do anything, I'll have to think that through.
Please give me your opinion with my friend problem. It would be much appreciated.
Anyone else had experience with a similar scenario?