I don't know the empirical truth of it, but I see it as two different facets of people;why aren't socionics and MBTI compatible? I never got that. though it might be because my brain automatically hybridized the two systems as I learned about them, leaving me with some as-of-yet-unarticulated hybrid in my brain.
I think they are both on the cusp of becoming both accessible and scientifically testable. its awesome. I want to be part of the momentum.
That sounds greatIn my system, I wouldn't posit thinking vs. feeling as if they're mutually exclusive or contradictory concepts. It's a false dichotomy.
I would perhaps have the following categories which focus more mental focus and processes:
- Intrapersonal-Creative analytical (Internal Directive) - ICAD
- Social-Creative analytical (External Directive) - SCAD
- Intrapersonal-Logical analytical (Internal Directive) - ILAD
- Social-Logical analytical (External Directive) - SLAD
- Intrapersonal-Systematic analytical (Inner Directive) - ISAD
- Social-Systematic analytical (External Directive) - SSAD
Intrapersonal Awareness vs. Interpersonal Awareness
- Social Aware
- Self Aware
- Local Aware
- Global Aware
Needs work but I like the first one.
Different perspective and standpoint.Ah thanks for the points! But isn't personal interaction simply a form of reacting to stimuli? In other words, why would there be a distinction between the processes by which an individual reactions to human stimuli and how they react to non-human stimuli? It's for this reason I assume that MBTI, socionic, Kiersey and even The Big Five personality profiles are basically the same thing, because they essentially say the same thing except contextualized slightly differently.