Arsal | Page 10 | INFJ Forum
A

Arsal

Permanent Fixture
Messages
946
Reaction score
405
Points
0
Joined
Last seen

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Oranguh
    Oh yea, I just disappeared haven't I~ I didn't really tell anyone did I, hmmmmm.

    Yes well, that just happens~ ANYWAYS

    As you are well aware, I'm an esfp~ so all I do is party party party~ And that's what we've been doing for the last weeks~ because over 3 weeks I have my national exams~!~ So we have to party now study later.
    aerosol
    hi, thank you. that was sweet of you. :)
    the pm is not that important; i'm more so interested in some yahoo chatting. you know, whenever you have the time. nooo ruussshh.
    Saru Inc
    I've already told you why I'm not an ENTP, yet you'd rather cling to your beliefs than admit defeat. thats cool.
    aerosol
    he's like the master, then? it confuses me because i've heard him mentioned in threads before and it wasn't positive.
    aerosol
    oh, my bad. what is your name on there? i may have blocked your invitation on accident because i forgot you added me and i get lots of spam/creepy ads which i always block.
    aerosol
    not much. how are you, Arsal? do you have msn or something like that? I've been wanting to talk to you more often.
    donkeybals
    I'll make a video as long as you change your mickey mouse avatar. He'ssssss innnnnn painnnnnnnnn. :p
    Artsu Tharaz
    I thought as much, but I seemed to remember reading someone say that Pod'lair typed her as INTP.

    Ok, I get what you mean by core then (sort of, I'm too tired to fully comprehend the logic of it). I think though, that for a J, this process isn't necessarily indicative of what was going on in their mind while the cognitive act was being performed - rather it is how they retrospectively justify what they were doing. Perhaps the tertiary function really does tend to be the function we turn to for explaining why we do certain things? Like, maybe an INTP would justify themselves with "well, I remember seeing it done like this before" even though that's not actually what was going on. Basically, there may be a tendency to justify something by criteria different to how the process was carried out.

    (as for applying this to the case in question, i dunno)
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Top Bottom
Back