- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 5w4
We All Love Differently.
Love means something different to everyone. Our 'hearts' feel differently, and our minds define love differently. I believe it is the same for friendship, loyalty, and other relationship attributes. We get into trouble when we assume that others love, are loyal, or define friendship as we do.
I am not speaking of 'love languages', which frames how we communicate our affections, but defining love itself, what it means, its importance in our lives, and our love hierarchies.
Ultimately all we can do is accept how others define these bonds, and try to find those most compatible with us.
How do you love? Or, how do you define love, loyalty or friendship? Have you struggled with others when those deeply personal definitions don't match.
----
When I got engaged my father gave me advice that has always been obvious to me because I grew up watching my parents interact: Your spouse comes first. He told me my SO and I were a family 'now', and one's spouse comes before every single other person, even one's parents, and even one's children. If a marriage is not healthy and happy, the children will suffer. They were deeply in love, deeply romantic and knew how to communicate, so any issues that arose did not last long.
This is my definition of love. One's spouse comes first, and after that, one's immediate family – the members of the house. I don't have kids, so this means the animals we committed to be responsible for. After everyone under our roof is taken care of and well, other's needs may be attended to.
My SO's definition of love is far different than my own.
Self comes first - Spouses should take care of themselves.
Duty comes before love. Even if he does not love a person, duty to them is the priority, and love comes last.
Right now we are clashing because he has a sense of duty that takes priority over those under our roof. One of those we agreed to care for needs attention, and it would take only an hour of his time (driving a little out of his way) to provide for them, and he is refusing. He believes I am violating him by asking this 'favor', while I believe he is shirking responsibility and showing he does not value love by refusing.
The best way to get on my bad side is by harming my animals in any way, and in this case, he is one of the parents and he is refusing to provide for them, so he is harming them and also shirking responsibility and duty. (I'm angry.)
Neither of us is wrong, nor right, but in my mind and heart, he is wrong.
-----
While reading posts on the forum, I often see these kinds of conflicts with couples. We define love differently, and sometimes those definitions clash.... So I'm beginning a thread to discuss it.
How does this issue arise in your lives?
PS:
While hacking at my post to make it shorter and tell less of my story, I left out a key point I wanted to ask everyone about.
Does type affect our definitions of love, loyalty, and friendship?
I may be wrong, but Fe/Fi seems to play a role.
In my parents' "spouse comes before all others, including self" relationship, both my parents were Fe dominant. ESFJ and INTP. My brother's marriage mirrors my parents' values. He is an ISTP - also Fe dominant, over Fi. INFJs are Fe dominant.
My SO is Fi dominant. The sense of duty is about self. It's about honor.
Does type come into play in your relationships in this manner?
Love means something different to everyone. Our 'hearts' feel differently, and our minds define love differently. I believe it is the same for friendship, loyalty, and other relationship attributes. We get into trouble when we assume that others love, are loyal, or define friendship as we do.
I am not speaking of 'love languages', which frames how we communicate our affections, but defining love itself, what it means, its importance in our lives, and our love hierarchies.
Ultimately all we can do is accept how others define these bonds, and try to find those most compatible with us.
How do you love? Or, how do you define love, loyalty or friendship? Have you struggled with others when those deeply personal definitions don't match.
----
When I got engaged my father gave me advice that has always been obvious to me because I grew up watching my parents interact: Your spouse comes first. He told me my SO and I were a family 'now', and one's spouse comes before every single other person, even one's parents, and even one's children. If a marriage is not healthy and happy, the children will suffer. They were deeply in love, deeply romantic and knew how to communicate, so any issues that arose did not last long.
This is my definition of love. One's spouse comes first, and after that, one's immediate family – the members of the house. I don't have kids, so this means the animals we committed to be responsible for. After everyone under our roof is taken care of and well, other's needs may be attended to.
My SO's definition of love is far different than my own.
Self comes first - Spouses should take care of themselves.
Duty comes before love. Even if he does not love a person, duty to them is the priority, and love comes last.
Right now we are clashing because he has a sense of duty that takes priority over those under our roof. One of those we agreed to care for needs attention, and it would take only an hour of his time (driving a little out of his way) to provide for them, and he is refusing. He believes I am violating him by asking this 'favor', while I believe he is shirking responsibility and showing he does not value love by refusing.
The best way to get on my bad side is by harming my animals in any way, and in this case, he is one of the parents and he is refusing to provide for them, so he is harming them and also shirking responsibility and duty. (I'm angry.)
Neither of us is wrong, nor right, but in my mind and heart, he is wrong.
-----
While reading posts on the forum, I often see these kinds of conflicts with couples. We define love differently, and sometimes those definitions clash.... So I'm beginning a thread to discuss it.
How does this issue arise in your lives?
PS:
While hacking at my post to make it shorter and tell less of my story, I left out a key point I wanted to ask everyone about.
Does type affect our definitions of love, loyalty, and friendship?
I may be wrong, but Fe/Fi seems to play a role.
In my parents' "spouse comes before all others, including self" relationship, both my parents were Fe dominant. ESFJ and INTP. My brother's marriage mirrors my parents' values. He is an ISTP - also Fe dominant, over Fi. INFJs are Fe dominant.
My SO is Fi dominant. The sense of duty is about self. It's about honor.
Does type come into play in your relationships in this manner?
Last edited: