Quite the controversial topic in the news recently.
'A 17-year-old boy whose lungs were irreversibly damaged by vaping received a double-lung transplant at the Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, a lifesaving measure taken when a patient’s own lungs are diseased or damaged beyond repair and there is no other hope of survival, doctors said on Tuesday.
Without the transplant, performed last month, the patient “would have faced certain death,” Dr. Hassan Nemeh, who led the surgical team, said during a news conference at the hospital.'
The rest of the story here:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ny...health/vaping-double-lung-transplant.amp.html
What are some of your thoughts regarding vaping?
Should notice be taken that individuals are filling these vaping devices with other substances besides the intended oils and liquids?
Should the companys and manufactures be penalised because the users found an alternate use for vaping devices and accessories?
Should traditional tobacco smokers continually be chastised for the "second-hand" smoke? Segregated outside, so others are not affected? Yet, Vapers inhale in stores, resturants, bars, schools, etc.??
Back to the news story about a 17 year old needing a double lung transplant for opting to use the vaping device for something other than its intended use...
Why?
'A 17-year-old boy whose lungs were irreversibly damaged by vaping received a double-lung transplant at the Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, a lifesaving measure taken when a patient’s own lungs are diseased or damaged beyond repair and there is no other hope of survival, doctors said on Tuesday.
Without the transplant, performed last month, the patient “would have faced certain death,” Dr. Hassan Nemeh, who led the surgical team, said during a news conference at the hospital.'
The rest of the story here:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ny...health/vaping-double-lung-transplant.amp.html
What are some of your thoughts regarding vaping?
Should notice be taken that individuals are filling these vaping devices with other substances besides the intended oils and liquids?
Should the companys and manufactures be penalised because the users found an alternate use for vaping devices and accessories?
Should traditional tobacco smokers continually be chastised for the "second-hand" smoke? Segregated outside, so others are not affected? Yet, Vapers inhale in stores, resturants, bars, schools, etc.??
Back to the news story about a 17 year old needing a double lung transplant for opting to use the vaping device for something other than its intended use...
Why?