Resources for Newbie Interested in Politics | INFJ Forum

Resources for Newbie Interested in Politics

writerinchief

Community Member
Nov 28, 2015
297
71
0
MBTI
INTP
So I've grown to realize that at my school, political know-how is prized. Politics is everyone's second language, and everyone knows how to converse in it; it's like Spanish on steroids (no offense was intended with that analogy).

Now, as an admittingly politically apathetic person, it's very hard for me to discuss politics with people, simply because I don't feel like I know enough about the subject. As an outsider, I think it's a mess, and frankly, I don't know where to start learning more about it. However, I really desire to participate in these discussions.

So what resources do you look at to stay on top of the American political scene?
 
When I was quite a bit younger in my undergraduate days I read a great book called "Theories of Political Economy" by Caporaso and Levine for a sociology unit I was studying and it really helped me to make sense of it all. But I think it does have an agenda that is to do with balancing wealth priorities in the interests of social justice. Anyway, you can check it out in the library and see if it's useful for you. Hope others on forum might suggest something more recently published...
 
I recommend you read:

Smith, Adam, The Wealth of Nations

Hitchens, Christopher, Thomas Jefferson: Author of America

Hayek, Friedrich, The Road to Serfdom

Stuart Mill, John, On Liberty

The following definitions were taken from this website: http://www.sparknotes.com/history/european/enlightenment/terms.html

Deism

A system of faith to which many of the French philosophes and other Enlightenment thinkers subscribed. Deists believed in an all-powerful God but viewed him as a “cosmic watchmaker” who created the universe and set it in autonomous motion and then never again tampered with it. Deists also shunned organized religion, especially Church doctrines about eternal damnation and a “natural” hierarchy of existence.

Enlightened Absolutism

A trend in European governments during the later part of the Enlightenment, in which a number of absolute monarchs adopted Enlightenment-inspired reforms yet retained a firm grip on power. Frederick the Great of Prussia, Maria-Theresa and Joseph II of Austria, Charles III of Spain, and Catherine the Great of Russia are often counted among these “enlightened despots.”

French Revolution

A revolution in France that overthrew the monarchy and is often cited as the end of the Enlightenment. The French Revolution began in 1789 when King Louis XVI convened the legislature in an attempt to solve France’s monumental financial woes. Instead, the massive middle class revolted and set up its own government. Although this new government was effective for a few years, internal dissent grew and power switched hands repeatedly, until France plunged into the brutally violent Reign of Terror of 1793–1794.Critics saw this violence as a direct result of Enlightenment thought and as evidence that the masses were not fit to govern themselves.

Glorious Revolution

The name given to the bloodless coup d’état in England in 1688, which saw the Catholic monarch, King James II, removed from the throne and replaced by the Protestants William and Mary. The new monarchs not only changed the religious course of England and the idea of divine right but also allowed the additional personal liberties necessary for the Enlightenment to truly flourish.

Individualism

One of the cornerstones of the Enlightenment, a philosophy stressing the recognition of every person as a valuable individual with inalienable, inborn rights.

Mercantilism

The economic belief that a favorable balance of trade—that is, more exports than imports—would yield more gold and silver, and thus overall wealth and power, for a country. Governments tended to monitor and meddle with their mercantilist systems closely, which Scottish economist Adam Smith denounced as bad economic practice in his Wealth of Nations.

Philosophes

The general term for those academics and intellectuals who became the leading voices of the French Enlightenment during the eighteenth century. Notable philosophes included Voltaire, the Baron de Montesquieu, and Denis Diderot.

Rationalism

Arguably the foundation of the Enlightenment, the belief that, by using the power of reason, humans could arrive at truth and improve human life.

Relativism

Another fundamental philosophy of the Enlightenment, which declared that different ideas, cultures, and beliefs had equal merit. Relativism developed in reaction to the age of exploration, which increased European exposure to a variety of peoples and cultures across the world.

Romanticism

A movement that surfaced near the end of the Enlightenment that placed emphasis on innate emotions and instincts rather than reason, as well as on the virtues of existing in a natural state. Writers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe both contributed greatly to the development of Romanticism.

Salons

Gathering places for wealthy, intellectually minded elites during the years during and prior to the Enlightenment. The salons typically held weekly meetings where upper-class citizens gathered to discuss the political and social theories of the day.

Scientific Revolution

A gradual development of thought and approaches to the study of the universe that took place from approximately 1500 to 1700 and paved the way for the Enlightenment. Coming from humble beginnings with basic observations, the Scientific Revolution grew to a fever pitch when scientists such as Galileo Galilei, René Descartes, and Johannes Kepler entered the scene and essentially rewrote history, disproving Church doctrines, explaining religious “miracles,” and setting the world straight on all sorts of scientific principles. The result was not only new human knowledge but also a new perspective on the acquisition of knowledge, such as the scientific method.

Separation of Power

A political idea, developed by John Locke and the Baron de Montesquieu, that power in government should be divided into separate branches—typically legislative, judicial, and executive—in order to ensure that no one branch of a governing body can gain too much authority.

Skepticism

A philosophical movement that emerged in response to rationalism and maintained that human perception is too relative to be considered credible. David Hume brought skepticism into the spotlight by suggesting that human perceptions cannot be trusted, and then Immanuel Kant elevated the field when he proposed that humans are born with innate “experiences” that give shape to their own, individual worlds.

Social Contract

An idea in political philosophy, generally associated with John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, stating that a government and its subjects enter into an implicit contract when that government takes power. In exchange for ceding some freedoms to the government and its established laws, the subjects expect and demand mutual protection. The government’s authority, meanwhile, lies only in the consent of the governed.

Sturm und Drang

Literally meaning “storm and stress,” the name given to an undercurrent of the German Enlightenment during which German youths expressed their angst by rebelling against the pleasant optimism of the time. Influenced partly by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s The Sorrows of Young Werther, participants in the Sturm und Drang movement harbored a depressed, more archaic idealism. Though it revealed a decided one-sidedness of the German Enlightenment, the movement did not sustain itself for very long.

Thirty Years’ War

A brutal, destructive conflict in Germany between 1618 and 1648. The Thirty Years’ War began when Bohemian Protestants revolted out of a refusal to be ruled by a Catholic king. The battle would eventually spread throughout Germany and involve many other countries on both sides, resulting in the death of nearly a third of the German population and unfathomable destruction. Enlightenment thinkers such as John Comenius and Hugo Grotius reacted against the war with treatises about education, international relations, and the nature of war itself.

I'll try to post more material.
 
Thanks for the recommendations, [MENTION=1814]invisible[/MENTION] and [MENTION=13855]JJJA[/MENTION]! I am probably going to focus more on researching recent political changes, maybe puzzle out the confusing platforms of the current Presidential elections, but I think these materials will be really valuable for me to figure out the context of the politics I observe.

I'm familiar the terms you wrote down, JJJA, because of my history class, but I'll definitely review them more in-depth. And I'll also make a stop by the library to ask about the books you all recommended.

Oh, yes, for certain, tell me if you suddenly remember something else you'd like to recommend.
 
To get the key concepts, assumed references, and universally understood metaphors in modern political thought, thorough familiarity with the classics of modern politics is a must.

A great anthology: "Classics of Modern Political Theory: Machiavelli to Mill." Oxford University Press, 1996.

  • ISBN-10: 0195101731
  • ISBN-13: 978-0195101737
 
I think that politics is usually described as the distribution of power. What do you believe is the best way to organise society so that power and wealth will be distributed to the greatest benefit? Who will benefit by the way society is organised, and who will not? Are they deserving, and does it matter whether they are deserving? What effects will the ways we direct and develop organisation of society have on the opportunities of future generations? The big questions are the most interesting and I think they are the thing most likely to resolve apathy, and the historical theoretical perspectives are there to deal with the questions. I think that these kinds of things are the key to all the current affairs stuff. It is very difficult to engage in discussion with no theoretical direction. I should really be reading more theory myself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dogman6126
[MENTION=862]Flavus Aquila[/MENTION] I have heard some acquaintances swear by that book, so I suppose it's high time I should actually read it. Thanks for reminding me! I have heard it's a difficult read, though, so I might have to save it to read over a break.

[MENTION=1814]invisible[/MENTION] The way you frame politics makes it sound really cool! I should start looking at the bigger picture when listening to the political debates my classmates have; maybe it would stroke my interest more.
 
I witness more American politics globally. It gives me a more keen sense of what is going on.
 
So I've grown to realize that at my school, political know-how is prized. Politics is everyone's second language, and everyone knows how to converse in it; it's like Spanish on steroids (no offense was intended with that analogy).

Now, as an admittingly politically apathetic person, it's very hard for me to discuss politics with people, simply because I don't feel like I know enough about the subject. As an outsider, I think it's a mess, and frankly, I don't know where to start learning more about it. However, I really desire to participate in these discussions.

So what resources do you look at to stay on top of the American political scene?

I have this problem a lot. I have a roommate who is extremely smart, part of MUN at my university, and seems to know all the ins and outs of politics. He even met the candidates for the republican primary. Kinda jealous, lol. I mostly just ask him questions in that area, I simply can't keep up with him. I don't have the background to disagree. Although, we do tend to agree on social and economic principles, so I'm not sure we would have much to disagree on. But I wish I knew more. It's such a massive field, I too don't know where to begin. I kinda am just picking up scraps along the way, hahaha. I'll probably be watching this thread, and might poach some of the suggestions others offer you, if you don't mind ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: invisible
I dislike politics in a way hard to put into words. In my mind, common sense should rule and that should be that. Strangely it turns out that since the vast majority of the population is not aware of anything other than themselves.... common sense it turns out is not correct sense. So really we need to call what we need "uncommon sense." Anyway ...
Once you get on your path I would only ask that you use thinking logic and reason. Not as your only tools but at least utilize them with intent. It happens so rarely in the population and yet is needed desperately.
Best of luck.
 
The most important thing is an education in politics and knowledge of the different points-of-view. Writerinchief, JJJA gave you some specific recommendations toward the conservative bent, I would recommend the following for liberal and socialist works to round out your understanding. I would say you should read everything to not only understand all points of view but to challenge your own assumptions.

Here are texts I would recommend:

Socialism

(1) The Marx-Engels Reader By Karl Marx; Friedrich Engels; Robert C. Tucker Love him or hate Marx provides one of the most potent critiques of capitalism
(2) Government in the Future Noam Chomsky
(3) What is to be done V.I Lenin
(4) The Road to Wigan Pier or Homage to Catalonia George Orwell
(5) Selections from the Prison Notebooks By Antonio Gramsci

Liberalism

(1) The New Industrial State J.K Galbraith
(2) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money John Meynard Keynes
(3) The Politics Presidents Make Stephen Skowronek
 
I have this problem a lot. I have a roommate who is extremely smart, part of MUN at my university, and seems to know all the ins and outs of politics. He even met the candidates for the republican primary. Kinda jealous, lol. I mostly just ask him questions in that area, I simply can't keep up with him. I don't have the background to disagree. Although, we do tend to agree on social and economic principles, so I'm not sure we would have much to disagree on. But I wish I knew more. It's such a massive field, I too don't know where to begin. I kinda am just picking up scraps along the way, hahaha. I'll probably be watching this thread, and might poach some of the suggestions others offer you, if you don't mind ;)

Go right ahead; you and I are kindred spirits; I too am partly motivated by envy towards my classmates who seem to know the ins and outs of politics. Maybe we should compare notes on what we've gathered about politics sometime!

[MENTION=14199]brightmoon[/MENTION] Thanks for the recommendations! People at my school are pretty liberal, actually, so this will help me a lot to understand their rationale.
 
A solid knowledge of world history is a must.

That said, in colloquial usage, politics more often than not refers to having an opinion of current world affairs. That opinion can be more or less informed, but with how much bias there is in information reporting it's hard to say what is the "correct" position. Practically, in social settings what seems to matter more than having an educated opinion is having the right one.