Pheeeeew! Thanks, Ren... *decocks Luger*Depends on the INTJ, just like for any other type
That being said, the INTJs I know are pretty excellent people. (@Deleted member 16771:)
Why?I dont think infj female dating intj male makes sense
at least not in my experience lmao
They're ok I guess
Well apparently I am one.Opinion of INTJs? good, bad indifferent?
There are INFJs who are total ****heads and fluffball INTJs. I don't believe in putting all representatives of one type in a single box.
Well apparently I am one.
My actual opinion is that the stereotypes are so negative that it just makes me feel really bad and I kinda don't want to be one.
INTJs are arrogant, selfish, know-it-all assholes.
That's all I ever hear, really. Or rather, those are the opinions that I remember, simply because they are so negative.
Then you flick through the threads on this forum and there's so much real hate. Someone in particular claims that they're just evil and should be avoided like the plague, and I just want to fade into the walls and give up.
I think people don't like them because the bad apples have a knack for creating complex logical fallacies that appear true initially, and are at the very least extremely difficult to take apart and refute in the heat of the moment. You can't win an argument with an INTJ, and when there is no give-and-take between people it becomes particularly frustrating to most people. So the "bad" INTJs stick out as more memorable than other INTJs and even other types. Like for example the worst an INFJ is gonna get is just obstinate, conspiratorial and ignoring of information, they won't bother taking time to explain all the minutia and reasons you are "wrong" like an INTJ will. INTJs can embody a sort of thoroughness that is difficult and frustrating to combat at multiple levels.
But on the flip side, the good and patient ones can lead people down pathways of clarity like no other. They are like an iron wall or a golden gate, basically.
Yeah that makes sense to me. I also think that there's a lot of amateur typing going on and thus people have started to default to labelling their bad experiences with 'INTJ'.I think people don't like them because the bad apples have a knack for creating complex logical fallacies that appear true initially, and are at the very least extremely difficult to take apart and refute in the heat of the moment. You can't win an argument with an INTJ, and when there is no give-and-take between people it becomes particularly frustrating to most people. So the "bad" INTJs stick out as more memorable than other INTJs and even other types. Like for example the worst an INFJ is gonna get is just obstinate, conspiratorial and ignoring of information, they won't bother taking time to explain all the minutia and reasons you are "wrong" like an INTJ will. INTJs can embody a sort of thoroughness that is difficult and frustrating to combat at multiple levels.
But on the flip side, the good and patient ones can lead people down pathways of clarity like no other. They are like an iron wall or a golden gate, basically.
I've learned today that Wyote is always right.i personally do not generally like fellow INTJs
Most of them are very argumentative which i personally find to be an odd way to be.
I've learned today that Wyote is always right.
There are INFJs who are total ****heads and fluffball INTJs. I don't believe in putting all representatives of one type in a single box.
Why?