Malala Yousufzai

[Motor Jax]

i have been staying on top of this case since it hit the news on 10Oct2012.
the Taliban claimed responsibility in the attack on 10Oct but they did not anticipate the negative backlash. it was infuriating to hear the Taliban trying to justify this attack.

Malala Yousufzai was shot in the head while being driven home after taking an exam. she was immediately taken to the hospital where they determined she needed better treatment, then she was taken to Peshawar where she spent a couple of days. they were very concerned about infection. with the help of international doctors and an induced coma, flown to Great Britain. when she awoke, she knew she wasn't in her own country. her first words were "what country am i in?" she knew the dangers that she was in, she remembers the events before, during and knew what was going on around her. she even asked for her schoolbooks to be brought when her family flew from Pakistan to Great Britain.


the following are excerpts from various articles about this attack. there are probably more but with the numerous news outlets i already follow, i have pretty much a clear picture of what happened:

"Just days before the Nobel committee announces the winner of this year's Nobel Peace Prize, the world found out who stands at the opposite extreme on the quest for peace and justice. We have discovered who the biggest cowards on the planet are today.
The competition for the mark of shame is hard fought, but the title goes to the men who approached a van carrying girls home from school in Pakistan on Tuesday and asked for one very special 14-year-old. Then shot her in the head.
The world's worst cowards are the members of the Pakistani Taliban. Perhaps they believe their thick dark beards, dangerous weapons and fanatical religious pronouncement make them fierce warriors. But their actions tell the true story: The Pakistani Taliban are terrified of a 14-year-old girl named Malala Yousufzai.
And why are they so afraid of Malala? Mostly, because she is not afraid of them.
And because Malala is a relentless advocate of education for girls, something the Taliban find very threatening.
The Taliban, with all their bravado, seem to fear women most of all."

"Malala Yousufzai initially gained international attention in 2009, writing a blog about her life as the Taliban gained a foothold in her home region of Swat, a Taliban redoubt in northwest Pakistan, near Afghanistan."

Malala "had become an education rights activist at an early age, and in so doing had become an international symbol of courage."

"At the age of 11, Malala Yousafzai took on the Taliban by giving voice to her dreams. As turbaned fighters swept through her town in northwestern Pakistan in 2009, the tiny schoolgirl spoke out about her passion for education – she wanted to become a doctor, she said – and became a symbol of defiance against Taliban subjugation."

"In 2011, she was nominated for the International Children’s Peace Prize. Later, Yousaf Raza Gilani, the prime minister at the time, awarded her Pakistan’s first National Youth Peace Prize."

"I have the right of education," she said in a 2011 interview with CNN. "I have the right to play. I have the right to sing. I have the right to talk. I have the right to go to market. I have the right to speak up." "We live in the 21st century," Malala said. "How can we be deprived from education?"

the international community expressed "outraged by the Taliban's October 9 attack."

"On Tuesday, October 9, gunmen shot Malala in the head and neck.
Now 14, she was coming home from school in a van with other schoolchildren when Taliban assassins stopped the vehicle, climbed on and demanded that the children identify her. Terrified, the children did it and the men fired, also wounding two other girls."

"The Taliban have claimed responsibility for the shooting in the conservative Swat Valley but don't appear to have anticipated the level of condemnation it would provoke."

"Speaking alongside him, Dr. Dave Rosser, medical director of University Hospitals Birmingham, gave the most positive prognosis yet for Malala's recovery.
"We don't think she has significant brain damage," he said, adding that she is very tired but "managed a big smile" when she saw her family.
The teenager is now walking with little help and "appears to have very good memories of both the last few days of her care and events prior to this incident," he said.
She is having tests on her hearing and vision Friday, mostly as a precaution because the bullet entered above her left eyebrow, he explained."

"In a message of defiance to the Taliban, authorities in Swat have decided to rename a government college after Malala Yousafzai, the 15-year-old girl who was shot in the head after demanding education for girls."


and is the first degree college in Swat Valley to be named after a female..



excerpts taken from following articles:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/10/w...i-survives-hit-by-pakistani-taliban.html?_r=0
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/15/world/malala-profile/index.html?iid=article_sidebar
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/15/world/asia/pakistan-teen-activist-attack/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/10/opinion/ghitis-malala-yousufzai/index.html?iid=article_sidebar
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/26/world/europe/uk-pakistan-teen-activist/index.html?hpt=hp_c2
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/25/world/asia/pakistan-college-malala/index.html

[YOUTUBE]qtUGPT3mp4c[/YOUTUBE]

Malala, the world prays for you

 

[Gaze]

She's my vote for Nobel Peace Prize next year.

 

[muir]

I think its pretty rotten how CNN and other corporate owned media are using this girl as a pawn in their international power games

They're not interested in taking education to Afghanistan they just want to control the access to the oil but in order to win over the support of the public in the west they have to pretend that they are on some sort of humanitarian mission

A horrible thing has happened to this young person who the corporate media used as a pawn, but are they making as much fuss about all the children killed and maimed by US bombs, bullets and sanctions?

The answer is obviously: NO and the reason is that they don't want the public of the US to know that the biggest murderers in the world are the military industrial complex who are behind the mainstream corporate media

 

[Motor Jax]

Malala was speaking as a Proud Pakistani of Swat Valley who stood up to the taliban in an area they controlled because she wanted an education..
the US didn't put an 11yr old in the crosshairs to push a political agenda..

this happened to one of their own in their own country

yes, Pakistan should be angry that the US dropped bombs on innocent civilians, but this happened in their own country to one of their own

just listening to her, she genuinely wants an education. the outrage comes because the taliban put a bullet thru her head to try and stop her

i have read numerous comments about this, and it boggles me that folks are trying to inject CIA, shadow governments, and political agendas painting the bulleye on a 14yr old

 

[Kanamori]

Muir, you're talking about the company of one of the rich people who actually gives a damn about things besides his own money and has given large portions of it to charities and to fighting the people you are talking about like Murdoch and the Republican disinformation machine, and has bought land the size of states to keep it from being exploited.

The American people have psychological motivation to avoid confronting all of the killing and strife our government has caused. People fall in line because they're afraid of the manic backlash which would be manufactured against them, as with the McCarthy era and other red scares, Iraq, "You don't support the troops" etc. Some of them genuinely fear that speaking too loudly will jeopardize their ability to do anything at all about the popular drivel-spewing nutters and warmongers.

Also, quite frankly, basically everyone will be better off w/o Al-Qaeda or the Taliban, regardless of which greedy and power-lusting people stand to benefit from it. One would think that people would realize prior to Malala just how crazy these groups are, but people all over the world are guilty of burying their heads in the sand sometimes. Furthermore, capitalism is hardly the only route to despotism, oligarchies, etc as basically all of the red-countries show... there is more involved than money. Power is the ultimate goal that these people have, and to them money is the means, and switching to something more benign sounding like communism is hardly going to fix it, again as has been shown by pretty much every red country.

 

[muir]

Malala was speaking as a Proud Pakistani of Swat Valley who stood up to the taliban in an area they controlled because she wanted an education..
the US didn't put an 11yr old in the crosshairs to push a political agenda..

this happened to one of their own in their own country

yes, Pakistan should be angry that the US dropped bombs on innocent civilians, but this happened in their own country to one of their own

just listening to her, she genuinely wants an education. the outrage comes because the taliban put a bullet thru her head to try and stop her

i have read numerous comments about this, and it boggles me that folks are trying to inject CIA, shadow governments, and political agendas painting the bulleye on a 14yr old

Your heart might be in the right place but it doesn't mean that there isn't an agenda behind all this. The mainstream corporate media is all a tightly controlled, carefully choreographed and edited circus designed to engineer your perceptions of reality ie to make you (the voting public) think and feel about things a certain way....its a tool used to sway public opinion

They've done this in the past

They used a woman from kuwait to make an impassioned speech in front of congress about how iraqi soldiers had invaded kuweit and were killing babies in hospitals by taking them out of incubators; this all turned out to be lies and it also turned out that the woman was not a nurse as she had claimed but was actually the daughter of the kuwaiti ambassador to the USA!!!

Here's some info about it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nurse_Nayirah

Also read about the now declassified 'pentagon papers' to see how the US government collude with the media to misslead the public; here's some info about it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_papers

What makes the kuwait situation even more sick is that the USA sold slant drilling technology to Kuwait so that they could drill under iraq and steal their oil. Iraq asked the USA if they could respond to this and the US said they wouldn't interfere, but of course they did!

Iraq had of course been a client state of the US and bought a lot of weapons off them

Here's saddam hussein shaking hands with donald rumsfeld back when they were buddies:



The elite who control the USA absolutely DOES have an agenda of control in the middle east and if there wasn't an agenda of control then they wouldn't give a damn about this little girl or any other little girls around the world

 

[muir]

Muir, you're talking about the company of one of the rich people who actually gives a damn about things besides his own money and has given large portions of it to charities and to fighting the people you are talking about like Murdoch and the Republican disinformation machine, and has bought land the size of states to keep it from being exploited.

I don't follow....who are you talking about here?

The American people have psychological motivation to avoid confronting all of the killing and strife our government has caused. People fall in line because they're afraid of the manic backlash which would be manufactured against them, as with the McCarthy era and other red scares, Iraq, "You don't support the troops" etc. Some of them genuinely fear that speaking too loudly will jeopardize their ability to do anything at all about the popular drivel-spewing nutters and warmongers.

Also, quite frankly, basically everyone will be better off w/o Al-Qaeda or the Taliban, regardless of which greedy and power-lusting people stand to benefit from it. One would think that people would realize prior to Malala just how crazy these groups are, but people all over the world are guilty of burying their heads in the sand sometimes. Furthermore, capitalism is hardly the only route to despotism, oligarchies, etc as basically all of the red-countries show... there is more involved than money. Power is the ultimate goal that these people have, and to them money is the means, and switching to something more benign sounding like communism is hardly going to fix it, again as has been shown by pretty much every red country.

What 'red countries'?

No one has acheived a state of communism.....the USSR and Maoist China were state capitalist countries....they had centrally controlled market economies

It suited their elites to call themselves 'communist' because of the social justice cache that comes with such an idea and it suited the US elites to call them 'communist' because they had already invested a lot of time and energy into creating a false idea in the US publics mind about what communism is through their corporate media....this process of changing the meanings of words was outlined pretty well by Orwell in his novel '1984'. He worked in the propaganda department of the BBC during the war so he knew what he was talking about

Here's US linguistics professor and political activist Noam Chomsky explaining what socialism is; he's an actual socialist so he will tell you more honestly what it is than FOX news will:

[video=youtube;K4Tq4VE8eHQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4Tq4VE8eHQ[/video]

Al Quaeda is largely the product of the US. It actually helps the US acheive its aims. The US elites operate throught eh hegelian principle of 'thesis, anti-thesis and synthesis' whereby they create a problem in order to produce a reaction in the public so that they can then offer their pre-prepared solution

So Al Queada is the perfect tool of the US

In fact half the things blamed on other people are probably carried out by the CIA or by CIA backed groups!

 

[Soulful]

My thoughts:

1. I'm in awe of her. I don't think I'd have the strength or courage to do and say what she does. I don't know if I'd have the conviction, either. But I am glad she does and that there are people like her in this world. I do wonder what makes them how they are. And I wish her healing and well-being.

2. The way the media is reporting on it does reflect its western interests, for sure. That's not to say some of what is being said is not perhaps what Malala herself may propose, or what the Pakistani people or goverment may say, but by and large there is an agenda to every news story. Whether it's intentionally perpetrated or is perpetrated through the mindless replication of the status quo, I don't know. @muir 's point about the U.S. obviously not reporting on the children their violence has murdered abroad is poignant.

3. I feel an internal groan coming at the way in which she is becoming a poster-child. I hate the way the western world seems to thrive on cases of exceptionalism and sensation. FFS, she is not the only child, and certainly not the only person, who is involved in great acts of courage and passion for social justice. What she is doing is spectacular and worthy of celebration, but it is imo on equal ground with all of the other millions of acts of courage and strength this world is witness to daily.

 

[acd]

I hope she grows up to build an army of bad ass female militants to take out the Taliban and restore peace to the land!

 

[Motor Jax]

she will most likely get an excellent education now, and be the youngest person to actually have power to change things for the better in pakistan

pakistan doesn't have a poster child, they have a fearless leader of change

 

[Soulful]

she will most likely get an excellent education now, and be the youngest person to actually have power to change things for the better in pakistan

pakistan doesn't have a poster child, they have a fearless leader of change

Yes, she could and that is very exciting!

On the subject of Malala as a poster child:

http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/10/25/malala-face-global-attacks-schools "Malala is face of global attack on schools"

http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/10/24/protecting-thailands-malalas "Protecting Thailand's Malalas"

I haven't read them but the titles alone are a bit suggestive. Anyhow, this doesn't really matter with regard to the issue. It's more of a personal annoyance I have with how our society runs.

 

[Gaze]

I'm glad that she is safe, and in better health, but I hope the message she stands for will not be lost in the focus on her. The larger message of all these young women's efforts including their bravery, is that they are not fighting only for themselves, but the rights of other young women to an education which provides opportunities for other young women in this generation and the next. Sometimes, there is too much focus on the heroism aspect and less on the goal they're trying to accomplish. The consequence focus should be on the achievement of more women's rights including more social and economic development, not just personal recognition for what these women have done. If the focus becomes too much about her, then the real goal or intent of this growing and possibly revolutionary women's movement maybe lost.

Edit: I hope the example of these young women inspires other young women and women in general, not to simply find faults or point out what is missing in women's opportunities or education in disadvantaged areas accross the world but to work on providing more opportunities for women using their talents, skills, and abilities.

 

[Motor Jax]

It's more of a personal annoyance I have with how our society runs.

i agree, society has a habit of putting folks on a pedestal

personally, i put her on the list with Mohammad Bouazizi, people who actually spoke out and acted instead of lip service

 

[Motor Jax]

excerpts concerning Malala, links provided below:

"LONDON: The response of Pakistan to the shooting of child activist Malala Yousafzai by the Taliban was a “turning point” for the country, her father said on Friday at the British hospital where she is recuperating.
“When she fell, Pakistan stood and the world rose. This is a turning point,” a clearly emotional Ziauddin Yousafzai told journalists.
He said Malala, 15, was recovering “at an encouraging speed” in the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham, where she was brought from Pakistan on October 15.
Malala was shot in the head in an attack which attracted condemnation in Pakistan and around the world after she was singled out by the Taliban for punishment because she campaigned for girls to be educated in Swat Valley."

"Those who tried to kill Malala Yousufzai failed to realise that they were pointing their guns not just towards a child activist from a small city in Pakistan but also towards a voice promoting a cause which people wanted to be heard in the country. The attackers could not recall, or perhaps were unaware of the past and recent history of the subcontinent, where female leaders have been capturing people’s imaginations and hearts for years."

"Interior Minister Rehman Malik has said that Malala Yousafzai’s family will be under guard when they return to Pakistan after her treatment and the government will pay for it.
In an interview with CNN in London, Malik said that the teenage activist had been offered security thrice before her shooting, but her father had refused.
He said that she would be given security when she returns to Pakistan. Malik said that this will require a cordon of female officers to surround Malala and one of male officers to surround the female contingent."

"Mother-of-four Azra Shabbir, now 32, was just 14 when her father married her off, forcing her to leave school and work with her husband in a shoe factory.
“I have two girls, both are in colleges like their brothers. I want to see them literate, see them prosperous no matter how much hard work I have to do for this,” she said with a glint of hope in her eyes.
“Our poverty haunts us like Taliban, but we can fight against it, like Malala did against Taliban,” she smiled."


http://tribune.com.pk/malala/
http://tribune.com.pk/story/457375/road-to-recovery-when-malala-fell-the-world-rose-up/
http://tribune.com.pk/story/457188/malala-plans-to-sit-for-her-final-exams-in-swat-father/
http://tribune.com.pk/story/457170/malala-inspires-students-to-learn/
http://tribune.com.pk/story/457296/helping-all-girls/
http://tribune.com.pk/story/457754/...ity-to-protect-malala-when-she-returns-malik/


http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia/2012/10/201210262060660910.html

Programmes:
http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/insidestory/2012/10/20121011725105524.html
http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/witness/2010/01/201012884237639104.html

 

[Soulful]

i agree, society has a habit of putting folks on a pedestal

personally, i put her on the list with Mohammad Bouazizi, people who actually spoke out and acted instead of lip service

Yes, for sure. Rhetorics of heroism rank high in western media. Check this out:

"Former British Prime Minister and current UN Special Envoy for Global Education Gordon Brown launched a United Nations petition[SUP][20][/SUP] in Yousafzai's name, using the slogan "I am Malala" and demanding that all children worldwide be in school by the end of 2015. Brown said he would hand the petition to Pakistan's President Asif Ali Zardari in November." (wikipedia, boding is mine)

I see the value of this kind of strategy, but I dislike the way western media heroizes people and sensationalizes actions. It's all so dramatic. And what Malala did is fantastic and greatly courageous, what she will do from here on will likely require even greater courage and I do not envy her position, but ultimately this is not just her. This is her father, the other supports she has in the life, and the daily courage of all of those who have come before her and who surround her. Ya know?
rant over.

 

[muir]

Yes, for sure. Rhetorics of heroism rank high in western media. Check this out:


I see the value of this kind of strategy, but I dislike the way western media heroizes people and sensationalizes actions. It's all so dramatic. And what Malala did is fantastic and greatly courageous, what she will do from here on will likely require even greater courage and I do not envy her position, but ultimately this is not just her. This is her father, the other supports she has in the life, and the daily courage of all of those who have come before her and who surround her. Ya know?
rant over.

It was clear within seconds of watching that video that the poor girl is terrified

 

[Motor Jax]

i'm just saying now she has the voice of a survivor to change things for the better for countless others. something the Taliban prob didn't expect

 

[muir]

I understand what you're saying

I just think its not a black and white situation

What is education? Even the Taliban have a form of education

The humble goat herder in Afghanistan might not be taught Shakespeare but he/she will learn about living in his/her environment and how to manage livestock. Their education might be an outdoor education whilst a westerner might have an extensive academic education that buries their own feelings on things under layer upon layer of indoctrination. in fact many westerners come out of university confident that they have all the answers when in fact they have simply been conditioned to repeat what they have been told. Repeaters are not innovators

I think for the people who are behind the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan to take control of the 'education' of native peoples around the world would see a form of cultural genocide which would see the break down of community leading to the widespread feelings of ennui experienced by many westerners.....which is of course exactly what the western elites want

 

[Apone]

[MENTION=1871]muir[/MENTION]

The first thing that popped into my head when I heard this story was 'propaganda'. People are losing interest in the war, so they need something to make people feel outraged or like the war is somehow 'just'. This story not only allows people to feel outraged, it also comes with the added bonus of feeling morally and culturally superior. And to be honest, I don't think that most people even really know or care about what's going on over there-- but they can relate to basic good versus evil narratives and you can't really get any more evil than trying to kill a young girl.

Blowing up schools because they let girls study there is impossible to defend from any perspective, but you have to wonder if these actions are a product of evil or if they're a product of the war itself and the need to make a 'point'… and I'm sure there are better ways to bring human rights to a country than invade. >15,000 children have already died in Afghanistan without anyone really giving a shit… and I'm pretty sure that the US isn't fighting this war for women's rights or education-- that's complete bullshit.

Just imagine how things could have been if the US hadn't created the Taliban in the first place.

 

[muir]

[MENTION=5090]Apone[/MENTION]

I think you're right

The elites do have to spin a narrative for the public to ensure their continued support. If the elites cared about educating the world then they would have invested their wealth into majority world countries instead of financially crippling them with neoliberal policies

I wish this girl all the best i really do but she was put into the firing line by a cynical western media machine and I think that stinks

The bogeyman of 'international terrorism' is largely the creation of the CIA and US government and other members of the neoliberal club such as Israel and the UK. BBC journalist Adam Curtis made a good documentary about it called the 'power of nightmares':

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGo1DqmfHjY

If you look at the 'terrorist' strikes in Europe, following 911, that galvanised popular opinion behind the war in iraq and Afghanistan they were railway tube strikes in London and in Madrid. These were sophisticated strikes which have a precedence in Europe:

There was a train strike in Bologna in 1980 which killed 85 people. The Italian secret service were involved as part of a 'strategy of tension' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategy_of_tension) organised by the CIA after world war two when they perceived that the new threat after the nazis would be communism

The CIA created 'stay behind armies' that were underground terrorist armies aimed at combating communism. They carried out terrorist acts to create fear in the public so that they would agree to more centralised, more authoritarian governments and cuts on civil rights

Over time these underground armies became exposed and various governments launched investigations into their existence and established their existence

For further info on this read up on 'Operation Gladio' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio). if you want to go even deeper then read up on the Proppaganda Due Freemasonic Lodge scandal (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_Due). This telles the story that was then protrayed in the godfather film where gods banker is hung from a bridge in london

Our secret services are behind most of the violence that happens out there and they play both ends in conflicts to keep the public scared and confused

They are also behind media aimed at manipulating public perceptions such as the massively hyped recent James Bond film 'Skyfall' in which the head of MI6 makes a speech to a political oversight committee in which she tells them that they should be left to operate in the 'shadows' without the oversight of our democratically elected officials!!!!!

Its exactly because these sociopaths have been allowed to act in the shadows that events like 911 and the train bombings and countless other murders have been able to occur

It isn't muslims sitting in caves carrying out these sophisticated attacks its our own secret services!

These people are all part of an established aristoctratic elite. Look at Eton educated Ian Fleming who wrote the James Bond novels. He gave Bond the codename 007 which was the codename of British magician John Dee who was the spymaster of Queen Elizabeth. Ian Flemings mother was Evelyn St Croix Rose

ST CROIX ROSE: the rosy cross....the rosicrucians...the rosicrucians were the descendents of the suppressed Knights Templar and you can see the Templar cross appear in the opening credits of skyfall at 2:44 in the clip below. Bond's own mother is Monique Delacroix Bond.....DELACROIX....of the cross. the Templars were not suppressed in the UK and they formed Freemasonry which has remained a vehicle for the elites to control things from behind the scenes:

[video=youtube;QftfyKbeUiU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QftfyKbeUiU[/video]

The more you look into this stuff the more bizarre connections are made. If you watch the Robert De Niro directed film the 'good shepherd' it shows Matt Damons character being initiated into Yale's Skull and Bones Society and from there he is recrutied into the CIA. His character is based on real life CIA chief James Jesus Angleton who was educated at elite british school Malvern College where British black magician Aleister Crowley was also educated. Crowley was also involved in espionage and he took over the Ordo Templi Orientis (OTO) which claimed to be in direct lineage with the Knights Templar

The music to skyfall also subliminally warns us of the skyfalling on our collective heads. So why are the elites telling us these things? They are worried that they are being exposed by the internet. In the film the bad guy is a computer expert that tells bond he can do more harm in front of a computer then bond can with his gun. They are worried that their secrecy is being lost because people are exposing them on the internet. They are also worried because the UK currently has debt of 800% to GDP, has very little gold reserves and has no manufacturing base due to the UK putting all its eggs into one basket, namely the financial district of London through which all the recent banking scandals such as: the Libor rate rigging, the london whale, MF Global and many more have all passed

This is because the 'city of london' (the financial district) is essentially unregulated...its the wild west of finance! Within its precincts is 'the temple' which is the old law courts that belonged to the Knights Templar who were of course famous BANKERS

So what is the agenda of the Templars? They were called the Poor Knights of the TEMPLE OF SOLOMON. Freemasonry is all about rebuilding the temple of Solomon. They were crusaders intent on taking Jerusalem and after hundreds of years the British Freemasonic elite did take Jerusalem and they gave it to the zionist Rothschilds by signing the 'Balfour Declaration'

The Rothschilds have bankrolled the UK since the Napoleonic wars. They were the money behind Cecil Rhodes De Beers diamond company that Rhodesia was named after and who instigated the Jameson raid that then lead to the Boer war. Freemason Rhodes set up the round table secret society or as US historian Prof Carroll Qugley called them 'the Milner set'. these groups set up the Council on Foreign relations in the US and Chatham house in the UK which are 'think tanks' that tell our governments how to conduct their foriegn policy

Is it any coincidence that James Bond fires his gun through the eye of horus at the start of each james bond film or that the london olympic logo spells ZION:

View attachment 16130

No there are reasons for all of these things. The reason being that we are being controlled by shadowy groups of people who are orchestrating all kinds of violence around the world and are changing the laws in our own countries for example introducing the NDAA in the USA which would allow US citizens to be locked up and detained without trial and be tortured

The James Bond films are all part of a PR campaign by the elites to improve the image of the spooks who work behind the scenes. The London premiere was attended by British royalty and the proceeds were given to ex-spys

Talking of british royalty there is a theory that Princess Diana may have gotten pregnant from Banker and Eton educated James Goldsmith whose banking family were neighbours of the Rothschilds in Frankfurt. His son Eton educated Ben married Kate Emma Rothschild in 2003

This is basically the real power behind our governments....these powerful banking families who own our central banks and print our money

These guys are the movers and shakers behind the secret services, the media, banking, oil, pharmaceuticals and weapons manufacturing. they've been doing it for hundreds of years now and they expanded into the US using agents such as the warburgs and the rockefellers

They have been manipulating our perceptions and they're doing it again with this news story. they want us fixated on foreign bogeymen to distract us from the fact they are stealing all our public funds in banking bailouts and quantitative easing (which keeps interests low destroying savings)

I could go on and on about various connections but i have to go to bed!

I'll mention one more. The guy who set up the British Secret Air Service (SAS), which isn't even officially recognised as existing, was David Stirling. He was born into an aristocratic Scottish family and was educated in elite university cambridge. In the 1970's he was worried that the British Labour party was going to undermine the power of the elites by giving more power to the workers so he organised a group of people called 'Great Britain 75' to infiltrate the trade unions in order to weaken the cause of the working people. The funding for this operation he got from banker james Goldsmith who i mentioned earlier. The English banker portrayed in Oliver Stone's film 'Wallstreet' is based on goldsmith

All this is going on and people wonder why our economy is fucked and why we are in constant war.....its because we are being controlled by shadowy banking families who have an agenda of global governance. if they're making such a mess of things now then why would it be any better under their global government? Its their centralised power that has caused all these problems in the first place

So yeah i'm skeptical of anything their filthy corporate media comes up with