Bernie Sanders | INFJ Forum

Bernie Sanders

Lerxst

Well-known member
Jul 3, 2010
2,380
750
0
MBTI
INFJ
Yeah, this is sort of a big deal. (Link )

The last time a Socialist was on the Presidential ticket in the US was 1912, with Eugene Debs. McCarthyism destroyed the Socialist/Liberal/Progressive movement in the 1950's and we've been limping along with our over-zealous Conservative politics pulling everyone further and further to the (much) Right of Moderate.

The rest of the world "got it". They've mostly established Social Democracies that enacted social policies and economic systems that met the needs of the citizens. During that same time we kept trudging along regurgitating the same propaganda about "The American Dream" - centered entirely on capitalistic and materialistic gains.

Now, Bernie Sanders is bringing Socialism back into the spotlight and not shying away from the label like very other Democrat in existence.

Clinton now has a real challenge ahead. The people on the Left already have her pegged as a sell-out to big business, that's nothing new. If/when she debates Sanders though, anything and everything she says will point her out to be more and more Republican like than any Democrat would want to image. Her stances on just about every major issue, short of some smaller social ones, points to her being a Republican with a Democratic name.

However, this of course, requires people actually knowing what a Republican is anymore. We're not talking about Ike or Teddy anymore. Republicans nowadays are the fringe group of bat-shit crazy, Bible-thumping lunatics that think brown people are worthy of killing on a whim and gay people should be denied cakes in a grocery store. Clinton is by no means as Liberal as Eisenhower, the poster-child for Republicans, even was. For those informed people that know this and watch a debate, there's not going to be any safe ground for Hilary to hide on that's not going ot make her look like a Conservative in sheep's clothing..

Sanders also has foreign policy under his belt. The US has spent the past 15 years alienating its traditional allies and essentially jumping off a cliff while other countries just scratched their heads and waved goodbye. Sanders, though, actually shares a lot of the same ideology that the rest of Europe has though. That alone already makes him a more effective negotiator and ambassador on that front.

Sanders also has the right charisma for the average person. He's blunt, talks in terms people understands, doesn't make a huge ordeal about himself or other propaganda (his campaign announcement was an impromptu 10 minute speech in front of about a dozen journalists and a few tourists) and isn't afraid to call people, businesses and lobbyists out on their bullshit.

He also has the Republicans (you know, those traditional ones that realize Red from Blue) scratching heir heads and thinking about what he says. That alone already jumps miles ahead of anything Obama has done or will do. Even people in my tiny, close minded community are thinking the Bernie might actually make some sense.

I's worth watching to see where this leads :)
 
Hi Lerxst

I used to talk about the 'mcCarthy withchunts' back when i was buying into the new left propaganda but since then i have developed a new perspective on McCarthy and what was going on at that time

McCarthy was talking about a 'communist plot' to take over the US from the inside

The kennedy brothers supported McCarthy and they were challenging the mafia front man Jimmy Hoffa as well. While John was president Bobby was able to legally pursue Jimmy

The mafia meanwhile were in bed with the CIA who linked up with the mafia to try and tackle the revolution in Cuba which saw the mafia lose their lucrative casinos

The CIA are basically the military wing of the Council on Foreign Relations which also has ties to the mafia

The Council On Foreign Relations (CFR) is a forum of globalist capitalists who are seeking to create a world government that they can control; their network is behind the creation of the United Nations

This corporate network has already created globalised infrastructure such as the World Bank and the IMF and they also control the central banking system including the federal reserve.

This corporate network want to create a one world government that controls the world centrally and that is the definition of 'communism' that McCarthy was using

When McCarthy was talking about an internal 'communist plot' in the US he was really referring to the CFR which did indeed have dealings with so called 'communists' for example they masterminded the bolshevik revolution in russia

The CFR then shot John kennedy and then Bobby kennedy thereby removing that barrier to their control of the US

They then got the markets deregulated and took the US off the gold standard; this then made the US dependent on the paper ('fiat') currency that they controlled the supply of through the federal reserve

This deregulation then led to the explosion of 'derivatives' and the resultant economic crisis of 2008 which has then seen the impoverishment of average americans and the enrichment of CFR members

This is all part of their plan to bring the US to its knees so that it cannot act as a barrier to their world government (known as the 'new world order': NWO)

This is not 'conspiracy theory' and many famous people have warned about this plot throughout US history it's just that the US public don;'t get to hear these views because the CFR bought up all the mainstream media and now control the flow of information to the US public

All these political struggles between the republicans and the democrats are all controlled by the CFR who control BOTH parties; this theatre is played out on the TV for the US public to make them think that they live in a democracy where they have some sort of say in what goes on in their country, but in truth they don't

It doesn't matter if you vote republican or democrat neither party will talk about who controls the money supply of the US

If the US public knew all this they could demand that the US treasury (a department of the government) took control of the money supply off the cartel of private banks who control the federal reserve because then the government could provide interest free money to the US public and could control the amount of money in circulation thereby avoiding inflation and deflation; this would then bring greater prosperity to the country and alleviate: unemployment, poverty and all the social ills that go with these

This is what people need to be talking about not all the political theatre that is being beamed into their minds by the TV because all that stuff is just a SOAP OPERA masking the fact that both parties are controlled by the CFR
 
Last edited:
Jan 3 2015

Sen. Bernie Sanders is taking on Wall Street directly with a new bill that would break up the nation’s “too big to fail” banks. At a press conference announcing the bill, Sen. Sanders said:
No single financial institution should be so large that its failure would cause catastrophic risk to millions of Americans or to our nation’s economic well-being. No single financial institution should have holdings so extensive that its failure would send the world economy into crisis. If an institution is too big to fail, it is too big to exist and that is the bottom line.
…..
If the American people are wondering why tens of millions of Americans are being charged interest rates of more than 20 percent on their credit cards, while big banks can receive virtually zero interest loans from the Federal Reserve, the lack of competition in the banking industry is a major reason for that.
If Teddy Roosevelt were alive today, do you know what he would say? He would say break ’em up. And he would be right.
And that’s exactly why we are here today.
The bill that I am introducing today with Congressman Brad Sherman would require regulators at the Financial Stability Oversight Council to establish “Too Big To Fail” list of financial institutions and other huge entities whose failure would pose a catastrophic risk on the United States economy without a taxpayer bailout.
This list must include, but is not limited to JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, and Morgan Stanley.
….
Importantly, under this bill, none of the institutions on the “Too Big to Fail list” would be able to receive a taxpayer bailout from the Federal Reserve; nor could they gamble with the federally insured bank deposits of the American people while they are on this list.
….
The function of banking should be to provide affordable loans to small businesses to create jobs in the productive economy. The function of banking should be to provide affordable loans to Americans to purchase homes and cars. Wall Street cannot be an island onto itself.
It is an exciting time on the left. Hillary Clinton has taken a bold and very liberal position on immigration reform while her opponent for the Democratic nomination, Sen. Bernie Sanders, has filed legislation that will break up the Big Banks. While Republicans are trying to avoid any of the discussions that matter to a vast majority of Americans, the candidates for the Democratic nomination are making it clear what they think the future of the country should look like.
Sen. Sanders has already taken on the Koch brothers; now he is going after Congress’s other sacred big fish, Wall Street.
The left is on the march, and the billionaires and corporations are in for a fight.
http://www.politicususa.com/2015/01...-introducing-bill-create-13-million-jobs.html
 

The power to break up the so called 'too big to fails' is already there

The US courts have anti-trust 'RICO' laws that could be used at any time to break up these monopoly capitalist monsters but yet it is not being done

You have to ask 'why not?'

Ask any US american on the street who has half a brain and they would say it is common sense to do it and why wasn't it done long ago?

The answer is that they are protected by the CFR (so the political will is not there at the top of US society where politicians are being paid by the financial sector to run their political campaigns)

There are two other big issues here....

One is that even if you break up the big banks it still hasn't solved the problem of who controls the money supply

If you think about who the people are behind those 'too big to fail' banks they are the same people who make up the cartel of private banks who run the federal reserve bank

So if you really want to break their grip over the US economy and its people then you have to take away their control over the money supply

The other issue with what sanders is proposing is that it is TOO LATE because the horse has already bolted. The wealth has already been sucked out of the economy and the people behind the banks and their global investor creditors have already tucked away the money off shore where the US government cannot get hold of it

So the solution is to create a NEW CURRENCY that is interest free and controlled by the treasury

President Lincoln did this to avoid borrowing money from the international bankers who were offering war loans to pay for the civil war. lincoln knew this would get his emerging country into debt slavery with the bankers so instead he created his own currency called the 'greenback' which he used to finance the war

So the bankers shot him
 
Last edited:
Yo! Bernie! The Denver Plan

and no mention of the CFR,CIA or the mafia
Proposed Text of the Bill
A BILL
To restore the authority of Congress to create and regulate money; to
provide for public investment, and for reducing the cost of such
investment; to retire public debt, and to provide a secure means of saving
to the people; to redress the United States’ foreign account balance; and, for
other public purposes.
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE
This Act may be cited as “The Money‐Sovereignty Recovery Act of
2013”
SECTION 2. FINDINGS; PURPOSES.
(a) Findings‐ The Congress finds as follows:
(1) The authority to create money is a sovereign power vested in the Congress under Article 1,
Section 8 of the Constitution;
(2) The Federal Reserve Banks System (Fed) allows unacceptable participation of private
interests into its constitution and operating processes.
(3) The private financial system, through lending, creates most of the money used in the US, in
direct violation of the US Constitution;
(4) This ceding of Constitutional power has contributed materially to a multitude of monetary
and financial afflictions, including:
(A) Growing and unreasonable concentration of wealth;
(B) Unbridled expansion of government debt;
(C) Drastic increase in the cost of public infrastructure investment;
(D) Record levels of unemployment and underemployment; and
(E) Persistent erosion of the ability of Congress to exercise its Constitutional
responsibilities to provide resources for the general welfare of the American
people.
(5) The creation of US money by private financial institutions occurs unrestrained also in foreign
countries, undermining the value and stability of our currency.
(6) Abolishing private money creation can be achieved with minimal disruption to current
financial operations, regulation and supervision;
(7) By supplying the financial system with the lending funds it requires, the Fed’ earning will
increase substantially, constituting a new source of non‐tax revenue for Federal and State
governments.
(8) The American Society of Civil Engineers has estimated that there is $2.2 trillion in unmet
infrastructure investment needs.
(9) Congress is stymied by competing forces: a desire to put people to work and an aversion to
borrowing money at market rates of interests to create programs to do so.
(10) The US trade deficit has reached an annual level of near half a trillion dollars per year;
and the accumulated deficit has surpassed the $6 trillion mark. That enormous dollar
overhang is intolerable, and constitutes a clear and present danger to our nation.
(11) After several decades of trade deficits, it is quite clear that currency exchange rates
changes have little or no effect on US trade deficits; a more effective approach is definitely
required.
(12) A close examination of the causes of the existing political gridlock in Washington D.C.
shows that it is the lack of a coherent set of economic principles, especially those related to
money and taxes, which preclude any reasonable agreement on policies.
(13) Left on their own, the disarray among economists will not be fixed; perhaps ever.
Therefore, Congress must, with the help of experts in several different fields including, but
not dominated by, economists, elaborate its own set of standard economic principles on
which to base current and future legislation.
(b) Purposes‐ The purposes of this Act are as follows:
(1) To restore the authority of Congress to create and regulate money;
(2) To Regulate the Flow of US Currency Abroad;
(3) To provide for a substantial increase in non‐tax public revenues;
(4) To provide for public investment, and for reducing the cost of such investment;
(5) To retire public debt; and to provide a secure means of saving for the people;
(6) To balance the United States’ foreign trade;
(7) To make other necessary provisions related to this Act.
SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.
(a) In General‐ For the purposes of this Act, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) Currency – Refers to the Fed‐notes and coins, which are the official physical
representations of money. They are interchangeable with Fed deposits—entries in Fedaccounts.
(2) Deposit – An amount of money given to a financial firm to open or add to a particular
account in that firm. E.g.: a checking account deposit, a savings deposit, an insurance
premium, a pension contribution, and investment shares with a financial firm.
(3) Fed – Short for Federal Reserve Banks System.
(4) High‐Yield Securities‐ Securities that pay interest rates higher than the current average
inflation rate.
(5) Lending – Consists in the exchange of money for a debt document—or repayment contract—
between a creditor and a borrower.
(6) Money – An accepted means to make a payment. E.g.: Fed‐notes, bank deposit, any liquid
financial asset. Also, purchasing power or capacity to purchase.
(7) Money creation – A financial institutions, including the Fed, creates money by crediting the
account of a borrower or by lending.
(8) Money Flow – A) It is the movement of money in the economy; it starts as a loan, enters the
economy, enables economic activities, and ends up as deposit in a financial firm. This flow
grows continuously—except in times of crisis—and it is associated with creation of money. B)
A smaller part of the money flow consists of the movement of checking deposits and Fed
notes. This flow grows very slowly, and little money creation is associated with it.
(9) Public Debt – Consists of securities issued by federal and state governments, which pay
interests higher than the inflation rate.
(10) Secretary – Refers to the Secretary of the Treasury.
SEC. 4. COORDINATION WITH OTHER LAW
(a) In General‐ This Act shall supersede any provision of Federal law in effect on the day
before the date of the enactment of this Act that is inconsistent with any provision of this
Act but only to the extent of such inconsistency.
TITLE I—RECONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE
SEC. 101. ELIMINATION OF PRIVATE PARTICIPATION IN THE FEDERAL RESERVE.
(a) Government Acquisition Of All Net Assets‐ On the effective date, the Secretary shall
purchase on behalf of the United States all net assets in the Federal reserve system,
including the Federal reserve banks, according to the rules specified in the Federal
Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 288) for this purpose.
(b) Disposition of Private Directors‐ Class A and Class B directors of the district banks shall
cease in their functions.
(c) Disposition of Private Employees‐ Private employees within the Fed shall become
federal employees, with equivalent ranks and salaries.
TITLE II—ORIGINATION OF UNITED STATES MONEY
SEC. 201. FULL RESERVE REQUIREMENT ON DEPOSITS
(a) In General‐ All deposits at any financial institution shall be kept in reserve at the Fed.
(b) Interest on deposits‐ The Fed shall pay interest at a 0.5% rate on the new reserves to the
respective financial institutions.
(c) Transitional Clause‐
(1) The Fed is hereby authorized to lend to each financial institution, interest free for one time
only, funds equal to its existing deposit liabilities, which shall be also kept in reserve at the
Fed, accruing no interests. Payment of this interest‐free loan shall have priority over any
other debt with the Fed.
(2) Financial Institutions shall continue paying the contracted interests on the original deposits
to their rightful owners.
SEC. 202. UNLAWFUL FOR FINANCIAL FIRMS TO LEND MONEY FROM DEPOSITS OR
OTHER PRIVATE FUNDS.
(a) Prohibition‐ All financial institutions are hereby prohibited from lending from deposits
or from any fund not originated directly from the Fed.
SEC. 203. ORIGINATION OF LENDING FUNDS.
(a) Supply of Lending funds‐ The Fed shall supply each financial institution with lending
funds in proportion to the reserves it holds for such institution.
(b) Flow of Lending Funds‐ The annual amount of funds to be lent to each institution shall
be proportional to the projected reserve it would hold by year’s end, with a uniform
loan‐to‐reserve ratio.
(c) Interest Setting‐ The Fed shall specify the interest rate that financial institutions shall pay
for the lending funds.
SEC. 204. DISPOSITION OF THE FDIC.
(a) Formulation of Plan‐ The Office of the Controller of the Currency (OCC) is hereby
charged with the formulation of a plan for the orderly disposition of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
(b) Presentation to Congress‐ The Plan shall be presented for Congressional Action no later
than 30 days after the enactment of this Bill
SEC. 205. PROHIBITION ON FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE US TO
RECEIVE DEPOSITS AND TO LEND US‐MONEY.
(a) Prohibition to Receive Deposits‐ Foreign financial firms operating in the US are hereby
prohibited from receiving deposits and lending US‐money.
TITLE III. A SUBSTANTIAL NEW SOURCE OF NON-TAX GOVERNMENT REVENUE.
SEC. 301. DISTRIBUTION OF FED’S EARNINGS.
(a) Distribution to Federal and States Governments‐ The earnings from the Fed’s operations
shall be distributed as revenue to the Federal government and to the States
governments. Seventy five percent of those earnings shall go to the Federal government;
and the remaining twenty five percent shall be distributed to each of the states in
proportion to their respective tax revenues.
(b) Deduction of Payments Due‐ The Fed is hereby authorized to deduct from these
distributions all payments due to the Fed by the respective governments.
TITLE IV. REGULATION OF US-MONEY FLOW ABROAD.
SEC. 401. THE UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL RESERVE BANK.
(a) Establishment‐ There is hereby established the United States International Bank
(hereafter to be referred to as the ‘IRB’) an agency of the United States of America.
(b) Organization‐ The IRB shall consist of a seven‐member Board of Governors, and a
number of Regional International Reserve Banks, located abroad, each headed by a
regional Director and Sub‐Director. Governors are appointed by the president, by and
with the advice and consent of the Senate; Directors and Sub‐Directors shall be
appointed by the Board of Governors.
(1) Terms‐ Governors shall be appointed for a term of six (6) years; except for the first time
such appointments are made, when three (3) of the Governors shall be appointed to serve
for only half of the normal term.
(2) Chairperson‐ One of the Governors shall be designated by the president as the Chairperson
of the IRB.
(c) Duties‐ The IRB shall:
(1) Hold reserves in US‐money from US financial firms operating abroad.
(2) Provide lending funds to those financial firms, at the set IRB‐rates.
(3) Provide loans to foreign governments as instructed by the president.
(4) Supply US currency in the form of IRB‐notes, for use abroad.
(5) Exchange foreign currency for IRB‐notes, at established rates.
(6) Serve as conduit for US‐money, into and out of the US.
(d) Meetings‐ the Board of Governors shall meet on a regular basis, subject to the call of the
Chairperson or a majority of the Governors.
(e) Pay‐ Governors shall receive salaries at annual rates equal to that determined under
section 5 of title 28, United States Code, for an associate justice.
(f) Staff‐ The Board of Governors may appoint and establish the pay of such employees as
deemed necessary.
(g) On IRB‐Notes‐
(1) IRB‐notes are fully equivalent in value to Fed‐notes of equal denomination.
(2) IRB‐Notes are exchangeable for Fed‐notes at any IRB sites, or authorized business
locations.
(3) IRB‐Notes are not legal tender within the US and its territories.
(h) Restrictions on Fed‐Notes‐
(1) Effective at the end of the 150‐day period beginning on the day of opening of the regional
IRB office, the circulation of Fed‐notes within the corresponding IRB region shall be
declared illegal; and exchanges of Fed‐notes with IRB‐notes shall be restricted in the
manner established by the IRB.
SEC. 402. UNLAWFUL FOR US FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS OPERATING ABROAD TO
CREATE US‐MONEY.
(a) Full Reserve Requirement on US‐Money Deposits‐ US financial institutions operating
abroad are hereby required to maintain all their deposits in US‐money in reserve with
the Regional IRB.
(b) Interest on deposits‐ The IRB shall pay interest at a 0.5% rate on the new reserves to the
respective financial institutions.
(c) Transitional Clause‐
(1) The IRB is hereby authorized to lend to each financial institution, interest free for one time
only, funds equal to its existing deposit liabilities, which shall be also kept in reserve at the
IRB, accruing no interests. Payment of this interest‐free loan shall have priority over any
other debt with the IRB.
(2) Financial institutions shall continue paying the contracted interests on the original deposits
to their rightful owners.
(d) Prohibition on Lending US‐Money‐ US financial institutions are hereby prohibited from
lending US‐money from deposits or from any fund not directly originating from the
Regional IRB.
TITLE V. THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC INVESTMENT FUNDS
SEC. 501. AUTHORIZING THE FED TO PROVIDE DIRECT PUBLIC LOANS TO FEDERAL
AND STATE GOVERNMENTS.
(a) Fed‐Public Loans‐ The Fed is hereby authorized to provide Fed‐public loans (FPLs) to
Federal and State governments, up to an annual amount not to exceed 30% of their
respective revenues, and up to accumulated totals below three times their yearly
revenues.
(b) Interest Charged on FPLs – Loans to the Federal government shall be provided interest
free; however, FPLs to State governments shall accrue an interest rate of 2%. Unless the
president, in extraordinary circumstances, determines that a waiver of such interests is
in order.
(c) Return of Interests to States‐ The total amount of money collected in interest payments
by the States shall be distributed among all the States in proportion to their annual
revenues.
(d) Repayment‐ FPLs shall be repaid fully in no more than 50 equal yearly installments.
TITLE VI. RETIRING PUBLIC DEBT, AND PROVIDING A SECURE MEANS OF SAVING FOR
THE PEOPLE.
SEC. 601. FEDERAL SAVINGS CERTIFICATES
(a) Creation of Savings Certificates‐ The Fed is hereby authorized to issue Federal Savings
Certificates (FSCs) that each year shall pay an interest rate equal to the rate of inflation of
the year before, but not to exceed 4%.
(b) Conditions‐ The FSCs shall be non‐negotiable, non‐expiring, and readily redeemable
after one year of purchase.
(c) Application Of Proceedings‐ The Fed shall use the proceeds of the FSCs to purchase
high‐yield government securities issued by federal and state governments, as they
mature, or earlier.
SEC. 602. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES OWNED BY THE FED.
(a) Accruing of Interests‐ Federal government Securities owned by the Fed shall become
interest free debt of the Federal government; State government securities, in contrast,
shall continue accruing interests to be paid by the authorities that issued them.
(b) Return to States of Interests paid‐ the total of all interests paid by the States on securities
held by the Fed shall be returned to the States in proportion to their annual revenues.
(c) Retirement Of Fed Owned Securities‐ The retirement of Federal government issued
securities shall start no later than the date when the last of the corresponding high‐yield
securities is retired; and shall be completed no later than 50‐years after such date.
SEC. 603. TEMPORARY TAX ON FINANCIAL ASSETS.
(a) Specifications‐ A temporary tax, no greater than 1%, shall be applied to the net financial
assets, over $1 million in value, of individual citizens and residents of the US.
(b) Exclusive Use of Such Tax‐ All the proceeds from the temporary tax on financial assets
shall be applied to retire the high‐yield securities of the Federal government.
TITLE VII—BALANCING THE FOREIGN TRADE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
SEC. 701. CREATION OF COUNTRY ESPECIFIC TARIFF.
(a) Authorization‐ The Secretary of Commerce is hereby authorized to create and put into
effect an especial tariff, to be known as Country Specific Tariff (CST), to be applied to
any foreign country with which the US has a trade deficit larger than 10% of bilateral
trade amount, for most of the last 10‐years.
(b) Application‐ The CST shall be applied to all import products originating from the excess
exporting country; unless the president, for reasons of State, determines otherwise.
(c) Tariff Rates‐ Each CST shall start at 10% ad valorem in addition to existing tariffs, after a
prudential time from its announcement; and increase by one percentage point every
month, until the bilateral trade is reversed.
(d) Duration‐ Each CST shall continue in place, at the highest tariff attained, until the
accumulated bilateral trade, starting ten years before the enactment of this Bill, is finally
balanced.
TITLE VIII—ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS.
SEC. 801. TAX ON FINANCIAL MARKETS TRANSACTIONS.
(a) Extent of Tax‐ The Security and Exchange Commission is hereby authorized to collect a
tax no larger than 1% on financial market transactions made in the US.
SEC. 802. THE COMMISION FOR ECONOMICS SCIENCES.
(a) Establishment‐ There is hereby established the United States Commission for Economics
Sciences (CES), as an advisory body to the US Congress.
(b) Membership‐ The CES shall be consist of eleven members; five of which are appointed
by the each of the two Houses of Congress, and one, to serve as the Commissioner, to be
appointed by the president; one of the five members appointed by the Lower House
shall also serve as the Deputy Commissioner.
(c) Membership Restrictions‐ No more than two of each group of five‐members shall be
professional economists, and not more than two shall belong to the same political party;
the Commissioner shall always be a non‐economist; and no member of Congress shall be
appointed to the Commission.
(d) Terms‐ each of the members are appointed for a term of six years; except, for the first
time the appointments are made, two of each group of five‐members, as specified by the
appointing authority, shall serve for half the established term.
(e) Duties‐
(1) The CES shall prepare, within one year from the enactment of this Bill, and for the
consideration of Congress the Official Economic Standards of the United States of America
(OES); and, periodically, shall propose any required update.
(2) The CES shall follow and document all Congressional Acts where the Official Economic
Standards are referenced; evaluate the overall effects of such Acts; and periodically publish
its findings.
(3) The CES shall make periodic recommendations regarding the teaching of economics at all
levels of public education.
(f) Meetings‐ the CES shall meet on a regular basis, subject to the call of the Commissioner
or a majority of the members.
SEC. 803. THE OFFICIAL ECONOMIC STANDARDS
(a) Establishment‐ There is hereby established the Official Economic Standards of the
United States of America (OES), as a list of standard economic principles to which any
new legislation, as well as any modification to existing legislation, must conform to.
(b) Contents of the List‐ The list of Standard Principles shall be fully coherent and contain
concise, policy‐relevant, and falsifiable statements related to the following topics:
(1) The economic activity
(2) Money and monetary flows;
(3) Banks and other financial institutions;
(4) Economic role of financial markets;
(5) Poverty;
(6) Unemployment;
(7) Disproportionate accumulation of wealth;
(8) Economic role of government;
(9) Taxation;
(10) Balanced trade;
(11) Economic growth;
(12) Any others deemed important by the CES.
‐‐o0o‐‐
www.researchgate.net/profile/Jorge_Moromisato/topics
 
Oh look a wall of text... [MENTION=1871]muir[/MENTION] must have posted :p


While I appreciate conspiracy theorists because I've seen more than several come to light as being real, not just some tin-foil-hat-wearing stories, I tend to have to operate on more of "what's on my plate" mode. That said though, I think of the phrase "the best laid plans of mice and men" in terms of a lot of conspiracies and governmental operations in general.

Sure, I do believe things like 9/11 being an inside job and all of that, but maybe not as zealous as most. I believe there are too many variables and factors that can't be accounted for when these plans are set for the theories to work out 100% as planned. It's easier to go back with 20/20 hindsight and say, Hey look, it was exactly what they thought" when in reality, it may have only been about 50% planned and the rest was improvised as they went.

In any case, with the McCarthy trials, I recall a movie based off a true story called "Fatherland" with Nick Nolte, where he plays an American-born German radio host during WWII. He spews propaganda all over German radio about the evil Americans while actually talking in code for the US government. At one point near the end of the war, one of the Nazis he was close to admitted to thinking he was an American spy but told him that his broadcasts did more good for Germany than any harm he was doing as a spy.

That's what I mean by the variables and factors. In Sci Fi terms, they can also be called "ghosts in the machine" when seemingly random bits of data join together to form a completely unintentional variation to the original design.

In terms of McCarthyism, sure there may have been a deeper conspiracy headed by countless others, but the consequences still resulted in the disarray the US has today; with no opposing views and a brainwashed populace that thinks Socialism = Cold War Communism. The problem with conspiracies is that they can't be proven until decades after the fact, hence the reason I have to take what's on my plate currently since I won't be around decades from now to say "I told you so!". And right now, what's on my plate is the lack of any outright Liberal, truly, Liberal view being expressed in the United States. That's why Bernie Sanders' campaign will be a milestone in US politics.
 
Oh look a wall of text... @muir must have posted :p


While I appreciate conspiracy theorists because I've seen more than several come to light as being real, not just some tin-foil-hat-wearing stories, I tend to have to operate on more of "what's on my plate" mode. That said though, I think of the phrase "the best laid plans of mice and men" in terms of a lot of conspiracies and governmental operations in general.

Sure, I do believe things like 9/11 being an inside job and all of that, but maybe not as zealous as most. I believe there are too many variables and factors that can't be accounted for when these plans are set for the theories to work out 100% as planned. It's easier to go back with 20/20 hindsight and say, Hey look, it was exactly what they thought" when in reality, it may have only been about 50% planned and the rest was improvised as they went.

In any case, with the McCarthy trials, I recall a movie based off a true story called "Fatherland" with Nick Nolte, where he plays an American-born German radio host during WWII. He spews propaganda all over German radio about the evil Americans while actually talking in code for the US government. At one point near the end of the war, one of the Nazis he was close to admitted to thinking he was an American spy but told him that his broadcasts did more good for Germany than any harm he was doing as a spy.

That's what I mean by the variables and factors. In Sci Fi terms, they can also be called "ghosts in the machine" when seemingly random bits of data join together to form a completely unintentional variation to the original design.

In terms of McCarthyism, sure there may have been a deeper conspiracy headed by countless others, but the consequences still resulted in the disarray the US has today; with no opposing views and a brainwashed populace that thinks Socialism = Cold War Communism. The problem with conspiracies is that they can't be proven until decades after the fact, hence the reason I have to take what's on my plate currently since I won't be around decades from now to say "I told you so!". And right now, what's on my plate is the lack of any outright Liberal, truly, Liberal view being expressed in the United States. That's why Bernie Sanders' campaign will be a milestone in US politics.

I don't know why people struggle with the idea that there is a conspiracy to control the population.....history has been one continual conspiracy by ruling classes to control the people

Do people really think now is different because they take a vote for one of two political parties every 5 years?

I mean think about it logically.....

It is not really about 'capitalism' v's 'socialism' or 'fascism' v;s 'communism' etc

because for a start no two people out there seem to be using these terms to mean the same thing!

It is really about CENTRALISED power v's DECENTRALISED power

So one person might use the corporate media defiition of socialism and mean a strong all pervasive government that runs the economy from a central authority

Whilst another person might talk about socialism but mean a system where there is little or no goverment and the workers own and control the means of production

One system involves everyone being controlled by a central authority whilst the other definition involves the people exercising decentralised power at community level

Federal power in the US has increasingly encroached on state power pulling the US more and more under a central corporate authority, moving the country closer and closer to fascism with the result that the people are suffering

I said all this was going to happen years ago on this forum...i explained it all in detail

People can't seem to understand this centralised power v's decentralised power thing, but it is THE MOST IMPORTANT THING THEY COULD POSSIBLY GRASP

So what is called the 'left' in the US is mostly composed of groups funded by rich people who are calling for a more powerful government

Whilst what is called the 'right' in the US is mostly composed of groups funded by powerful people who are calling for a more powerful government!

This is because powerful people WANT a powerful government which they can control (through their money and influence) to use as a tool to control and oppress the population and to protect their business interests

This is why the police are brutalising the poor at the moment...because they work for the corporate government NOT for the people

The CFR conspiracy is a conspiracy by powerful monied interests to CENTRALISE their power more and more. They have business interests in MANY different countries, so they want a globalised government to protect their international interests

So going back to the logical thinking thing.....if you think about what happens if a person starts exercising power over people they need to then enforce their authority over them; they will use thugs ('muscle') to do that. The people being controlled then feel hostile towards their oppressor. The oppressor then perceives the population as their enemy and views them suspiciously and has to then constantly think of new ways to keep them under their control

Centralised power ALWAYS pits the oppressor against the oppressed

The day the public will come to maturation is the day they realise that their government (central authority controlled by the monied interests) views THEM as the primary enemy not foreign states or religions (who are just used as bogeymen to scare the home population)
 
I like how this thread has turned to the moronic
 
I don't know why people struggle with the idea that there is a conspiracy to control the population.....history has been one continual conspiracy by ruling classes to control the people

Do people really think now is different because they take a vote for one of two political parties every 5 years?

I mean think about it logically.....

It is not really about 'capitalism' v's 'socialism' or 'fascism' v;s 'communism' etc

because for a start no two people out there seem to be using these terms to mean the same thing!

It is really about CENTRALISED power v's DECENTRALISED power

So one person might use the corporate media defiition of socialism and mean a strong all pervasive government that runs the economy from a central authority

Whilst another person might talk about socialism but mean a system where there is little or no goverment and the workers own and control the means of production

One system involves everyone being controlled by a central authority whilst the other definition involves the people exercising decentralised power at community level

Federal power in the US has increasingly encroached on state power pulling the US more and more under a central corporate authority, moving the country closer and closer to fascism with the result that the people are suffering

I said all this was going to happen years ago on this forum...i explained it all in detail

People can't seem to understand this centralised power v's decentralised power thing, but it is THE MOST IMPORTANT THING THEY COULD POSSIBLY GRASP

So what is called the 'left' in the US is mostly composed of groups funded by rich people who are calling for a more powerful government

Whilst what is called the 'right' in the US is mostly composed of groups funded by powerful people who are calling for a more powerful government!

This is because powerful people WANT a powerful government which they can control (through their money and influence) to use as a tool to control and oppress the population and to protect their business interests

This is why the police are brutalising the poor at the moment...because they work for the corporate government NOT for the people

The CFR conspiracy is a conspiracy by powerful monied interests to CENTRALISE their power more and more. They have business interests in MANY different countries, so they want a globalised government to protect their international interests

So going back to the logical thinking thing.....if you think about what happens if a person starts exercising power over people they need to then enforce their authority over them; they will use thugs ('muscle') to do that. The people being controlled then feel hostile towards their oppressor. The oppressor then perceives the population as their enemy and views them suspiciously and has to then constantly think of new ways to keep them under their control

Centralised power ALWAYS pits the oppressor against the oppressed

The day the public will come to maturation is the day they realise that their government (central authority controlled by the monied interests) views THEM as the primary enemy not foreign states or religions (who are just used as bogeymen to scare the home population)

And I don't disagree with any of it.

If I remember, you don't live in the US, so I have one question - have you heard Bernie Sanders speak? He'd more than likely agree with you on a lot of points.

That's why having a non-billionaire politician who has no track record of ever taking money from millionaires and billionaires is actually a milestone in our politics. Now, if only he wouldn't get assassinated in his first term in office...
 
And I don't disagree with any of it.

If I remember, you don't live in the US, so I have one question - have you heard Bernie Sanders speak? He'd more than likely agree with you on a lot of points.

That's why having a non-billionaire politician who has no track record of ever taking money from millionaires and billionaires is actually a milestone in our politics. Now, if only he wouldn't get assassinated in his first term in office...

He won't get assassinated
 
You guys are wacky.

There was a famous american writer called ezra....ezra pound

He questioned who ran the US federal reserve so they locked him up in a mental asylum

He then got a researcher by the name of eustice mullins to make the necessary enquiries into the federal reserve and found it was run by a cartel of inter married banking families

They create the money of the US

if you don't know that and you use that money every day....YOU are wacky

[video=youtube;YXz1Vx5-bKs]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXz1Vx5-bKs[/video]
 
Last edited:
US professor of history Dr Carrol Quigley taught president Bill Clinton at university and he wrote the book 'tragedy and hope' in which he explained the agenda of the people behind the CFR

http://www.jonesreport.com/article/05_08/30quigley.html

Dr. Quigley described the genesis of the Council on Foreign Relations as follows:
At the end of the war of 1914, it became clear that the organization of this system had to be greatly extended. . . . Lionel Curtis . . . established, in England and each dominion, a front organization to the existing local Round Table Group…This front organization, called the Royal Institute of International Affairs, had as its nucleus in each area the existing submerged Round Table Group…in New York it was known as the Council on Foreign Relations, and was a front for J. P. Morgan and Company in association with the very small American Round Table Group. The American organizers were dominated by the large number of Morgan 'experts'… The Round Table for years (until 1961) was edited from the back door of Chatham House grounds in Ormond Yard, and its telephone came through the Chatham House switchboard (Tragedy and Hope: 951-952).​
“Stealth” is the preferred “modus operandi” practiced by The Rhodes Secret Society, Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA), and the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) in establishing the European Union (EU), the North American Community (AKA: North American Union – NAU), and last week’s Union of South American Nations (UNASUR). “Stealth” has enabled them to manipulate the American people by keeping us ignorant, uninformed, and confused from the days of Cecil Rhodes to today. Dr. Quigley described the manipulation of such tactics over our American political process visa-via the false left vs. right paradigm:​
The chief problem of American political life for along time has been how to make the two Congressional parties more national and international…(therefore) argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers…Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy (Tragedy and Hope: 1247-1248).​
Such stealthy underhanded tactics have always been the means to an end, including but not limited to the eradication of the sovereignty of independent nations in order to achieve their ultimate goal of establishing a one world government, transcending from the inception of The Rhodes Secret Society to The Round Table Group in Great Britain to Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA), and the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR). Tragedy and Hope took Dr. Quigley over twenty years of researching the coveted archives of Cecil Rhodes secret society. Dr. Quigley dedicated his career “to training undergraduates in techniques of historical analysis which will help them to free their understanding of history from the accepted categories and cognitive classifications of the society in which we live, since these, however necessary they…nevertheless do often serve as barriers which shield us from recognition of the underlying realities themselves (Tragedy and Hope: ix).”
 
There was a famous american writer called ezra....ezra pound

He questioned who ran the US federal reserve so they locked him up in a mental asylum

Ezra Pound wrote The Cantos, which is one of the best poems in the 20th century. However, he was a mentally ill and sensitive soul. Evil people convinced him to join the fascist and nazi movements in the early 30's. He said horrible things like this in a 1943 Italian radio postcast:

"– You let in the Jew and the Jew rotted your empire, and you yourselves out-jewed the Jew ... And the big Jew has rotted EVERY nation he has wormed into."

He was arrested after the war as a war criminal. He was released after Hemingway voiced his support for Pound. At the time, the prison personel described him as "permanently and incurably insane" and said that releasing him would serve no positive purpose.

The poor old man traveled to Italy where he lived out his days.

Why did I write all of this? Because this man was a brilliant poet that made some of the best poetry ever. He influenced the generation that came after him immensely, and his memory lives on.

His political involvement, however, should be taken as the works of a man that was indoctrinated and fed lies like the rest of Europe during the 30's and 40's.

tl;dr: Ezra Pound was not jailed for speaking out against the federal reserve, he was a brilliant poet that became a crazy fascist/nazi.
 
Ezra Pound wrote The Cantos, which is one of the best poems in the 20th century. However, he was a mentally ill and sensitive soul. Evil people convinced him to join the fascist and nazi movements in the early 30's. He said horrible things like this in a 1943 Italian radio postcast:

"– You let in the Jew and the Jew rotted your empire, and you yourselves out-jewed the Jew ... And the big Jew has rotted EVERY nation he has wormed into."

He was arrested after the war as a war criminal. He was released after Hemingway voiced his support for Pound. At the time, the prison personel described him as "permanently and incurably insane" and said that releasing him would serve no positive purpose.

The poor old man traveled to Italy where he lived out his days.

Why did I write all of this? Because this man was a brilliant poet that made some of the best poetry ever. He influenced the generation that came after him immensely, and his memory lives on.

His political involvement, however, should be taken as the works of a man that was indoctrinated and fed lies like the rest of Europe during the 30's and 40's.

tl;dr: Ezra Pound was not jailed for speaking out against the federal reserve, he was a brilliant poet that became a crazy fascist/nazi.

who you gonna believe?
 
Ezra Pound wrote The Cantos, which is one of the best poems in the 20th century. However, he was a mentally ill and sensitive soul. Evil people convinced him to join the fascist and nazi movements in the early 30's. He said horrible things like this in a 1943 Italian radio postcast:

"– You let in the Jew and the Jew rotted your empire, and you yourselves out-jewed the Jew ... And the big Jew has rotted EVERY nation he has wormed into."

He was arrested after the war as a war criminal. He was released after Hemingway voiced his support for Pound. At the time, the prison personel described him as "permanently and incurably insane" and said that releasing him would serve no positive purpose.

The poor old man traveled to Italy where he lived out his days.

Why did I write all of this? Because this man was a brilliant poet that made some of the best poetry ever. He influenced the generation that came after him immensely, and his memory lives on.

His political involvement, however, should be taken as the works of a man that was indoctrinated and fed lies like the rest of Europe during the 30's and 40's.

tl;dr: Ezra Pound was not jailed for speaking out against the federal reserve, he was a brilliant poet that became a crazy fascist/nazi.

When ezra pound was talking about the 'jews' he was talking about the khazarian conspiracy which is an occult conspiracy (operating for example through freemasonry) which hides behind jews

There are jews of the jewish faith who are not part of the conspiracy but there are also people who might be publically seen as 'jews' who are really freemasons and they are the people pound was talking about

Those people control the federal reserve of the US and as Pound said they were subverting the US and German society through cultural marxism and all the problems and divisions we are seeing in our society are the direct result of their insidious influence

Try to look past the 'jew' label and make a distinction between those people who are trying to live within spirit (jews of the torah) and 'jews' who are not but instead who are engaging with matter and money and diamonds and earthly power

Those latter 'jews' are descendents of the khazars NOT the biblical hebrews. They converted to judaism enmasse in the 700's AD

They ARE subverting your society as Pound said and they DO control the federal reserve as Pound said and they created the zionist state of Israel and continue to destabilise the middle east to this day and commit atrocities in gaza

They exercise a mafia type control over our governments through threats, violence and bribery and by promoting their people to positions of power and influence to act as 'gatekeepers' who then manage the system

Pound turned to the fascists in europe because he wanted them to resist the insidious influence of the khazars which do and indeed HAVE rotted our societies
 
Last edited:
When ezra pound was talking about the 'jews' he was talking about the khazarian conspiracy which is an occult conspiracy (operating for example through freemasonry) which hides behind jews

There are jews of the jewish faith who are not part of the conspiracy but there people who might be publically seen as 'jews' who are really freemasons and they are the people pound was talking about

Those people control the federal reserve of the US and as Pound said they were subverting the US and German society through cultural marxism and all the problems and divisions we are seeing in our society are the direct result of their insidious influence

Try to look past the 'jew' label and make a distinction between those people who are trying to live within spirit (jews of the torah) and 'jews' who are not but instead who are engaging with matter and money and diamonds and earthly power

Those latter 'jews' are descendents of the khazars NOT the biblical hebrews. They converted to judaism enmasse in the 700's AD

They ARE subverting your society as Pound said and they DO control the federal reserve as Pound said and they created the zionist state of Israel and continue to destabilise the middle east to this day and commit atrocities in gaza

They exercise a mafia type control over our governments through threats, violence and bribery and by promoting their people to positions of power and influence to act as 'gatekeepers' who then manage the system

Pound turned to the fascists in europe because he wanted them to resist the insidious influence of the khazars which do and indeed HAVE rotted our societies

Where's your proof for any of this? Your conclusions are wildly different from what history has recorded through friends and people close to Ezra Pound.
 
Where's your proof for any of this? Your conclusions are wildly different from what history has recorded through friends and people close to Ezra Pound.

Wow where to start?

First of all can i say that it is cool that you have bothered to ask....a lot of people just say: 'you're crazy'

So that's good, because it means you have an open mind

I would like to provide you with evidence to back up what i'm saying, but providing the right pieces of what is a vast puzzle so that you can see the picture that i can see is a difficult thing to achieve in the space of only one post....can you understand that?

Often i load a post with information and then get accused of posting a 'wall of text'. Sometimes if people are presented with too much in one go they are put off from even attempting to look at it.....so i have to get the balance right

So instead of me trying to throw everything into one post can i suggest that you continue to read my posts as and when you come across them on this forum (you can even read old ones for example in my thread here: http://www.infjs.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26531 ) and as you read them keep it in your mind that i am always speaking about the same network of people who operate behind countless different names

So when you hear the following terms people use to speak about this network, know that they are speaking about the same network:

  • shadow government
  • new world order
  • round table group
  • secret society network
  • illuminati
  • the enterprise
  • the milner group
  • the black lodge
  • the psychopathic control grid
  • the control system
  • bilderberg
  • the military industrial complex
  • the central bankers
  • bohemian grove
  • the council on foreign relations
  • the power elite
  • the khazarian mafia
  • the reptilians
  • big brother
  • the corporatocracy
  • etc
President eisenhower's farewell speech warning about the rise of the military industrial complex (a war machine driving a war economy powered by war loans and oil and weapons from the network); their power has only deepened since he made this speech

[video=youtube;8y06NSBBRtY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY[/video]
 
Great piece by canadian journalist dean henderson (very good at tracing the flows of money)

http://www.infowars.com/the-federal-reserve-cartel-the-eight-families/

Dean Henderson
Infowars.com
Global Research
June 1, 2011
(Part one of a four-part series)
The Four Horsemen of Banking (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo) own the Four Horsemen of Oil (Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell, BP Amoco and Chevron Texaco); in tandem with Deutsche Bank, BNP, Barclays and other European old money behemoths. But their monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil patch.

According to company 10K filings to the SEC, the Four Horsemen of Banking are among the top ten stock holders of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation.[1]
So who then are the stockholders in these money center banks?
This information is guarded much more closely. My queries to bank regulatory agencies regarding stock ownership in the top 25 US bank holding companies were given Freedom of Information Act status, before being denied on “national security” grounds. This is rather ironic, since many of the bank’s stockholders reside in Europe.
One important repository for the wealth of the global oligarchy that owns these bank holding companies is US Trust Corporation – founded in 1853 and now owned by Bank of America. A recent US Trust Corporate Director and Honorary Trustee was Walter Rothschild. Other directors included Daniel Davison of JP Morgan Chase, Richard Tucker of Exxon Mobil, Daniel Roberts of Citigroup and Marshall Schwartz of Morgan Stanley. [2]
J. W. McCallister, an oil industry insider with House of Saud connections, wrote in The Grim Reaper that information he acquired from Saudi bankers cited 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank- by far the most powerful Fed branch- by just eight families, four of which reside in the US. They are the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.
CPA Thomas D. Schauf corroborates McCallister’s claims, adding that ten banks control all twelve Federal Reserve Bank branches. He names N.M. Rothschild of London, Rothschild Bank of Berlin, Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Warburg Bank of Amsterdam, Lehman Brothers of New York, Lazard Brothers of Paris, Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York, Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy, Goldman Sachs of New York and JP Morgan Chase Bank of New York. Schauf lists William Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff and James Stillman as individuals who own large shares of the Fed. [3] The Schiffs are insiders at Kuhn Loeb. The Stillmans are Citigroup insiders, who married into the Rockefeller clan at the turn of the century.
Eustace Mullins came to the same conclusions in his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, in which he displays charts connecting the Fed and its member banks to the families of Rothschild, Warburg, Rockefeller and the others. [4]
The control that these banking families exert over the global economy cannot be overstated and is quite intentionally shrouded in secrecy. Their corporate media arm is quick to discredit any information exposing this private central banking cartel as “conspiracy theory”. Yet the facts remain.
The House of Morgan
The Federal Reserve Bank was born in 1913, the same year US banking scion J. Pierpont Morgan died and the Rockefeller Foundation was formed. The House of Morgan presided over American finance from the corner of Wall Street and Broad, acting as quasi-US central bank since 1838, when George Peabody founded it in London.
Peabody was a business associate of the Rothschilds. In 1952 Fed researcher Eustace Mullins put forth the supposition that the Morgans were nothing more than Rothschild agents. Mullins wrote that the Rothschilds, “…preferred to operate anonymously in the US behind the facade of J.P. Morgan & Company”. [5]
Author Gabriel Kolko stated, “Morgan’s activities in 1895-1896 in selling US gold bonds in Europe were based on an alliance with the House of Rothschild.” [6]
The Morgan financial octopus wrapped its tentacles quickly around the globe. Morgan Grenfell operated in London. Morgan et Ce ruled Paris. The Rothschild’s Lambert cousins set up Drexel & Company in Philadelphia.
The House of Morgan catered to the Astors, DuPonts, Guggenheims, Vanderbilts and Rockefellers. It financed the launch of AT&T, General Motors, General Electric and DuPont. Like the London-based Rothschild and Barings banks, Morgan became part of the power structure in many countries.
By 1890 the House of Morgan was lending to Egypt’s central bank, financing Russian railroads, floating Brazilian provincial government bonds and funding Argentine public works projects. A recession in 1893 enhanced Morgan’s power. That year Morgan saved the US government from a bank panic, forming a syndicate to prop up government reserves with a shipment of $62 million worth of Rothschild gold. [7]
Morgan was the driving force behind Western expansion in the US, financing and controlling West-bound railroads through voting trusts. In 1879 Cornelius Vanderbilt’s Morgan-financed New York Central Railroad gave preferential shipping rates to John D. Rockefeller’s budding Standard Oil monopoly, cementing the Rockefeller/Morgan relationship.
The House of Morgan now fell under Rothschild and Rockefeller family control. A New York Herald headline read, “Railroad Kings Form Gigantic Trust”. J. Pierpont Morgan, who once stated, “Competition is a sin”, now opined gleefully, “Think of it. All competing railroad traffic west of St. Louis placed in the control of about thirty men.”[8]
Morgan and Edward Harriman’s banker Kuhn Loeb held a monopoly over the railroads, while banking dynasties Lehman, Goldman Sachs and Lazard joined the Rockefellers in controlling the US industrial base. [9]
In 1903 Banker’s Trust was set up by the Eight Families. Benjamin Strong of Banker’s Trust was the first Governor of the New York Federal Reserve Bank. The 1913 creation of the Fed fused the power of the Eight Families to the military and diplomatic might of the US government. If their overseas loans went unpaid, the oligarchs could now deploy US Marines to collect the debts. Morgan, Chase and Citibank formed an international lending syndicate.
The House of Morgan was cozy with the British House of Windsor and the Italian House of Savoy. The Kuhn Loebs, Warburgs, Lehmans, Lazards, Israel Moses Seifs and Goldman Sachs also had close ties to European royalty. By 1895 Morgan controlled the flow of gold in and out of the US. The first American wave of mergers was in its infancy and was being promoted by the bankers. In 1897 there were sixty-nine industrial mergers. By 1899 there were twelve-hundred. In 1904 John Moody – founder of Moody’s Investor Services – said it was impossible to talk of Rockefeller and Morgan interests as separate. [10]
Public distrust of the combine spread. Many considered them traitors working for European old money. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil, Andrew Carnegie’s US Steel and Edward Harriman’s railroads were all financed by banker Jacob Schiff at Kuhn Loeb, who worked closely with the European Rothschilds.
Several Western states banned the bankers. Populist preacher William Jennings Bryan was thrice the Democratic nominee for President from 1896 -1908. The central theme of his anti-imperialist campaign was that America was falling into a trap of “financial servitude to British capital”. Teddy Roosevelt defeated Bryan in 1908, but was forced by this spreading populist wildfire to enact the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. He then went after the Standard Oil Trust.
In 1912 the Pujo hearings were held, addressing concentration of power on Wall Street. That same year Mrs. Edward Harriman sold her substantial shares in New York’s Guaranty Trust Bank to J.P. Morgan, creating Morgan Guaranty Trust. Judge Louis Brandeis convinced President Woodrow Wilson to call for an end to interlocking board directorates. In 1914 the Clayton Anti-Trust Act was passed.
Jack Morgan – J. Pierpont’s son and successor – responded by calling on Morgan clients Remington and Winchester to increase arms production. He argued that the US needed to enter WWI. Goaded by the Carnegie Foundation and other oligarchy fronts, Wilson accommodated. As Charles Tansill wrote in America Goes to War, “Even before the clash of arms, the French firm of Rothschild Freres cabled to Morgan & Company in New York suggesting the flotation of a loan of $100 million, a substantial part of which was to be left in the US to pay for French purchases of American goods.”
The House of Morgan financed half the US war effort, while receiving commissions for lining up contractors like GE, Du Pont, US Steel, Kennecott and ASARCO. All were Morgan clients. Morgan also financed the British Boer War in South Africa and the Franco-Prussian War. The 1919 Paris Peace Conference was presided over by Morgan, which led both German and Allied reconstruction efforts. [11]
In the 1930’s populism resurfaced in America after Goldman Sachs, Lehman Bank and others profited from the Crash of 1929. [12] House Banking Committee Chairman Louis McFadden (D-NY) said of the Great Depression, “It was no accident. It was a carefully contrived occurrence…The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so they might emerge as rulers of us all”.
Sen. Gerald Nye (D-ND) chaired a munitions investigation in 1936. Nye concluded that the House of Morgan had plunged the US into WWI to protect loans and create a booming arms industry. Nye later produced a document titled The Next War, which cynically referred to “the old goddess of democracy trick”, through which Japan could be used to lure the US into WWII.
In 1937 Interior Secretary Harold Ickes warned of the influence of “America’s 60 Families”. Historian Ferdinand Lundberg later penned a book of the exact same title. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas decried, “Morgan influence…the most pernicious one in industry and finance today.”
Jack Morgan responded by nudging the US towards WWII. Morgan had close relations with the Iwasaki and Dan families – Japan’s two wealthiest clans – who have owned Mitsubishi and Mitsui, respectively, since the companies emerged from 17th Century shogunates. When Japan invaded Manchuria, slaughtering Chinese peasants at Nanking, Morgan downplayed the incident. Morgan also had close relations with Italian fascist Benito Mussolini, while German Nazi Dr. Hjalmer Schacht was a Morgan Bank liaison during WWII. After the war Morgan representatives met with Schacht at the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland. [13]
The House of Rockefeller

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t
  • {openx:49}
BIS is the most powerful bank in the world, a global central bank for the Eight Families who control the private central banks of almost all Western and developing nations. The first President of BIS was Rockefeller banker Gates McGarrah- an official at Chase Manhattan and the Federal Reserve. McGarrah was the grandfather of former CIA director Richard Helms. The Rockefellers- like the Morgans- had close ties to London. David Icke writes in Children of the Matrix, that the Rockefellers and Morgans were just “gofers” for the European Rothschilds. [14]
BIS is owned by the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, Bank of Italy, Bank of Canada, Swiss National Bank, Nederlandsche Bank, Bundesbank and Bank of France.
Historian Carroll Quigley wrote in his epic book Tragedy and Hope that BIS was part of a plan, “to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole…to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements.”
The US government had a historical distrust of BIS, lobbying unsuccessfully for its demise at the 1944 post-WWII Bretton Woods Conference. Instead the Eight Families’ power was exacerbated, with the Bretton Woods creation of the IMF and the World Bank. The US Federal Reserve only took shares in BIS in September 1994. [15]
BIS holds at least 10% of monetary reserves for at least 80 of the world’s central banks, the IMF and other multilateral institutions. It serves as financial agent for international agreements, collects information on the global economy and serves as lender of last resort to prevent global financial collapse.
BIS promotes an agenda of monopoly capitalist fascism. It gave a bridge loan to Hungary in the 1990’s to ensure privatization of that country’s economy. It served as conduit for Eight Families funding of Adolf Hitler- led by the Warburg’s J. Henry Schroeder and Mendelsohn Bank of Amsterdam. Many researchers assert that BIS is at the nadir of global drug money laundering. [16]
It is no coincidence that BIS is headquartered in Switzerland, favorite hiding place for the wealth of the global aristocracy and headquarters for the P-2 Italian Freemason’s Alpina Lodge and Nazi International. Other institutions which the Eight Families control include the World Economic Forum, the International Monetary Conference and the World Trade Organization.
Bretton Woods was a boon to the Eight Families. The IMF and World Bank were central to this “new world order”. In 1944 the first World Bank bonds were floated by Morgan Stanley and First Boston. The French Lazard family became more involved in House of Morgan interests. Lazard Freres- France’s biggest investment bank- is owned by the Lazard and David-Weill families- old Genoese banking scions represented by Michelle Davive. A recent Chairman and CEO of Citigroup was Sanford Weill.
In 1968 Morgan Guaranty launched Euro-Clear, a Brussels-based bank clearing system for Eurodollar securities. It was the first such automated endeavor. Some took to calling Euro-Clear “The Beast”. Brussels serves as headquarters for the new European Central Bank and for NATO. In 1973 Morgan officials met secretly in Bermuda to illegally resurrect the old House of Morgan, twenty years before Glass Steagal Act was repealed. Morgan and the Rockefellers provided the financial backing for Merrill Lynch, boosting it into the Big 5 of US investment banking. Merrill is now part of Bank of America.
John D. Rockefeller used his oil wealth to acquire Equitable Trust, which had gobbled up several large banks and corporations by the 1920’s. The Great Depression helped consolidate Rockefeller’s power. His Chase Bank merged with Kuhn Loeb’s Manhattan Bank to form Chase Manhattan, cementing a long-time family relationship. The Kuhn-Loeb’s had financed – along with Rothschilds – Rockefeller’s quest to become king of the oil patch. National City Bank of Cleveland provided John D. with the money needed to embark upon his monopolization of the US oil industry. The bank was identified in Congressional hearings as being one of three Rothschild-owned banks in the US during the 1870’s, when Rockefeller first incorporated as Standard Oil of Ohio. [17]
One Rockefeller Standard Oil partner was Edward Harkness, whose family came to control Chemical Bank. Another was James Stillman, whose family controlled Manufacturers Hanover Trust. Both banks have merged under the JP Morgan Chase umbrella. Two of James Stillman’s daughters married two of William Rockefeller’s sons. The two families control a big chunk of Citigroup as well. [18]
In the insurance business, the Rockefellers control Metropolitan Life, Equitable Life, Prudential and New York Life. Rockefeller banks control 25% of all assets of the 50 largest US commercial banks and 30% of all assets of the 50 largest insurance companies. [19] Insurance companies- the first in the US was launched by Freemasons through their Woodman’s of America- play a key role in the Bermuda drug money shuffle.
Companies under Rockefeller control include Exxon Mobil, Chevron Texaco, BP Amoco, Marathon Oil, Freeport McMoran, Quaker Oats, ASARCO, United, Delta, Northwest, ITT, International Harvester, Xerox, Boeing, Westinghouse, Hewlett-Packard, Honeywell, International Paper, Pfizer, Motorola, Monsanto, Union Carbide and General Foods.
The Rockefeller Foundation has close financial ties to both Ford and Carnegie Foundations. Other family philanthropic endeavors include Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, General Education Board, Rockefeller University and the University of Chicago- which churns out a steady stream of far right economists as apologists for international capital, including Milton Friedman.
The family owns 30 Rockefeller Plaza, where the national Christmas tree is lighted every year, and Rockefeller Center. David Rockefeller was instrumental in the construction of the World Trade Center towers. The main Rockefeller family home is a hulking complex in upstate New York known as Pocantico Hills. They also own a 32-room 5th Avenue duplex in Manhattan, a mansion in Washington, DC, Monte Sacro Ranch in Venezuela, coffee plantations in Ecuador, several farms in Brazil, an estate at Seal Harbor, Maine and resorts in the Caribbean, Hawaii and Puerto Rico. [20]
The Dulles and Rockefeller families are cousins. Allen Dulles created the CIA, assisted the Nazis, covered up the Kennedy hit from his Warren Commission perch and struck a deal with the Muslim Brotherhood to create mind-controlled assassins. [21]
Brother John Foster Dulles presided over the phony Goldman Sachs trusts before the 1929 stock market crash and helped his brother overthrow governments in Iran and Guatemala. Both were Skull & Bones, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) insiders and 33rd Degree Masons. [22]
Stock up with Fresh Food that lasts with eFoodsDirect (Ad)
The Rockefellers were instrumental in forming the depopulation-oriented Club of Rome at their family estate in Bellagio, Italy. Their Pocantico Hills estate gave birth to the Trilateral Commission. The family is a major funder of the eugenics movement which spawned Hitler, human cloning and the current DNA obsession in US scientific circles.
John Rockefeller Jr. headed the Population Council until his death. [23] His namesake son is a Senator from West Virginia. Brother Winthrop Rockefeller was Lieutenant Governor of Arkansas and remains the most powerful man in that state. In an October 1975 interview with Playboy magazine, Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller- who was also Governor of New York- articulated his family’s patronizing worldview, “I am a great believer in planning- economic, social, political, military, total world planning.”
But of all the Rockefeller brothers, it is Trilateral Commission (TC) founder and Chase Manhattan Chairman David who has spearheaded the family’s fascist agenda on a global scale. He defended the Shah of Iran, the South African apartheid regime and the Chilean Pinochet junta. He was the biggest financier of the CFR, the TC and (during the Vietnam War) the Committee for an Effective and Durable Peace in Asia- a contract bonanza for those who made their living off the conflict.
Nixon asked him to be Secretary of Treasury, but Rockefeller declined the job, knowing his power was much greater at the helm of the Chase. Author Gary Allen writes in The Rockefeller File that in 1973, “David Rockefeller met with twenty-seven heads of state, including the rulers of Russia and Red China.”
Following the 1975 Nugan Hand Bank/CIA coup against Australian Prime Minister Gough Whitlam, his British Crown-appointed successor Malcolm Fraser sped to the US, where he met with President Gerald Ford after conferring with David Rockefeller. [24]
Next Week: Part II: Freemasons & The Bank of the United States


[1] 10K Filings of Fortune 500 Corporations to SEC. 3-91
[2] 10K Filing of US Trust Corporation to SEC. 6-28-95
[3] “The Federal Reserve ‘Fed Up’. Thomas Schauf. www.davidicke.com 1-02
[4] The Secrets of the Federal Reserve. Eustace Mullins. Bankers Research Institute. Staunton, VA. 1983. p.179
[5] Ibid. p.53
[6] The Triumph of Conservatism. Gabriel Kolko. MacMillan and Company New York. 1963. p.142
[7] Rule by Secrecy: The Hidden History that Connects the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons and the Great Pyramids. Jim Marrs. HarperCollins Publishers. New York. 2000. p.57
[8] The House of Morgan. Ron Chernow. Atlantic Monthly Press NewYork 1990
[9] Marrs. p.57
[10] Democracy for the Few. Michael Parenti. St. Martin’s Press. New York. 1977. p.178
[11] Chernow
[12] The Great Crash of 1929. John Kenneth Galbraith. Houghton, Mifflin Company. Boston. 1979. p.148
[13] Chernow
[14] Children of the Matrix. David Icke. Bridge of Love. Scottsdale, AZ. 2000
[15] The Confidence Game: How Un-Elected Central Bankers are Governing the Changed World Economy. Steven Solomon. Simon & Schuster. New York. 1995. p.112
[16] Marrs. p.180
[17] Ibid. p.45
[18] The Money Lenders: The People and Politics of the World Banking Crisis. Anthony Sampson. Penguin Books. New York. 1981
[19] The Rockefeller File. Gary Allen. ’76 Press. Seal Beach, CA. 1977
[20] Ibid
[21] Dope Inc.: The Book That Drove Kissinger Crazy. Editors of Executive Intelligence Review. Washington, DC. 1992
[22] Marrs.
[23] The Rockefeller Syndrome. Ferdinand Lundberg. Lyle Stuart Inc. Secaucus, NJ. 1975. p.296
[24] Marrs. p.53
Dean Henderson is the author of Big Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families & Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics & Terror Network and The Grateful Unrich: Revolution in 50 Countries. His Left Hook blog is at [url]www.deanhenderson.wordpress.com[/URL]