Hyacinth
Community Member
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 2w1s
Exactly. Gotta throw ppl off every now and thenCould throw in a 10th if you're feeling extra zesty![]()
Exactly. Gotta throw ppl off every now and thenCould throw in a 10th if you're feeling extra zesty![]()
Sometime in my late 20's I got tired of sorting socks by color, black and brown belts to match alike shoes and pants. My solution: Black and grey tones are my preference. So, all dress socks are black, same brand (no sorting), black shoes, belts, wallet, suits, jackets. Grey sport socks all the same brand. Most shirts, ties, jeans, etc. work with black and grey tones. Oila! Totally simplified wardrobe while still being fashionable. Probably works for guys better than gals though.
My partner sticks with black, dark grey, and dark blue.Probably works for guys better than gals though.
In the general sense, yes, true enough. In the legal sense, as in details of the case, no, Johnny is the victim, and Amber the aggressor cardinale.And how silly it is to take one side or the other, when they were clearly both hurting each other. As is often the case in relationships. Both guilty, both the victim
In the general sense, yes, true enough. In the legal sense, as in details of the case, no, Johnny is the victim, and Amber the aggressor cardinale.
But it would be hard to know that given the spin (polite) it was/is given.
It’s as spun as, e.g., Kyle Rittenhouse.
Cheers,
Ian
Understood, and I am a skeptic extraordinaire. That said, the court transcripts are publicly available, and you can freely read and see for yourself.My skepticism goes back to money - how many times has Trump gotten away with things when he is almost certainly guilty, because of his money? Between Johnny and Amber, one of those two has far more resources at their disposal. Compare their net worth. I think if someone liked Johnny less, maybe they would be more inclined to question his innocence
I might guess he’s chosen behaviors which would be well outside the rule of law, but I never question his innocence, as there is little to question—very little went to trial, and even less resulted in a conviction or verdict of guilt.Just as someone who hates Trump is highly inclined to question his innocence. And would maybe give a loved one the benefit of the doubt, because they are fond of them
Understood, and I am a skeptic extraordinaire. That said, the court transcripts are publicly available, and you can freely read and see for yourself.
I might guess he’s chosen behaviors which would be well outside the rule of law, but I never question his innocence, as there is little to question—very little went to trial, and even less resulted in a conviction or verdict of guilt.
Cheers,
Ian
Indeed, but one thing money can’t do is make what Amber voluntarily shared go away, nor would those in control of money want it to.That's one of the things you can do with money, hide evidence, get rid of it. Anytime money like that is involved, I think it's good to have some degree of skepticism
Money is a very powerful thing and can sway even those who normally hold firm to their ideals
Indeed, but one thing money can’t do is make what Amber voluntarily shared go away, nor would those in control of money want it to.
Cheers,
Ian