Personality Prism

[QuickTwist]

To find your previous results, I can look to see if I can get the links for you. Is there anything that you responded in particular to either of the passage groups that you read, or any of your demographic data?

The first time I took it, I think I commented on analyzing the behaviors of the people in the stories and how it did/didn't make sense. In the second, I talked more about the same thing, only for the system itself rather than for the people in the stories.

I recall for the first one, there was a story about a clock maker who "hired" all the people, whether they made a "mistake" or not. There was also a story about a person waiting at a crosswalk and finally went to retrieve a box from a building, which I entertained the possibility of it being at a bank and was a lockbox.

The second had a story about a photographer photographing no one. There was also a story about a food-eating contest.

 

[Wyote]

I also read your story @PersonalityPrism
You are very overqualified rofl
We need more tests like this though, that are input based
So thanks!

 

[QuickTwist]

Oh! I have figured out how to find my previous results! Just go to the main page link.

 

[Elder]

 

[PersonalityPrism]

The first time I took it, I think I commented on analyzing the behaviors of the people in the stories and how it did/didn't make sense. In the second, I talked more about the same thing, only for the system itself rather than for the people in the stories.

I recall for the first one, there was a story about a clock maker who "hired" all the people, whether they made a "mistake" or not. There was also a story about a person waiting at a crosswalk and finally went to retrieve a box from a building, which I entertained the possibility of it being at a bank and was a lockbox.

The second had a story about a photographer photographing no one. There was also a story about a food-eating contest.

Omg. Sorry, I kept checking this thread but didn't realize it had gone over to a page two. I see on your next comment that you found your results though!

 

[PersonalityPrism]

I also read your story @PersonalityPrism
You are very overqualified rofl
We need more tests like this though, that are input based
So thanks!

Lol, I'm just old Just have had more time to accumulate experience ,)

Thank you for the feedback and thank you very much for taking the time to check PRISM out!

 

[PersonalityPrism]

Oh! I have figured out how to find my previous results! Just go to the main page link.

Yeah. I'm sorry, the first time you asked, I had thought you meant that there was an issue with the landing page not showing previous results either. I'm glad you found them!

I'm working on adding user accounts. I really didn't think people wanted them and preferred anonymized data, but I figure I can just leave that up to them to decide and offer the option ,)

 

[PersonalityPrism]

I also read your story @PersonalityPrism
You are very overqualified rofl
We need more tests like this though, that are input based
So thanks!

You know, I did kind of gloss over the fact that you took the time to read that. Thank you for that. While I'm engaged with someone who has read it (I don't get to do that much. I don't really have a lot of first person engagement with users yet), what did you think about how it read? Like, I know there's a touch of CV on there lol but otherwise, is it tough to grind through the wall of text? Have you explored much of the rest of the site? Any other comments if you have the time? I'd really appreciate it, but for sure don't feel obligated

 

[Wyote]

You know, I did kind of gloss over the fact that you took the time to read that. Thank you for that. While I'm engaged with someone who has read it (I don't get to do that much. I don't really have a lot of first person engagement with users yet), what did you think about how it read? Like, I know there's a touch of CV on there lol but otherwise, is it tough to grind through the wall of text? Have you explored much of the rest of the site? Any other comments if you have the time? I'd really appreciate it, but for sure don't feel obligated

I didn't feel as though it was tough or too much, personally.
Your writing style seems welcoming and caters to a wide audience while maintaining a professional tone.
I dug around and the writing consistently feels personable but not overly so, which is good imo.

My main thought about the types feels sort of Enneagram adjacent.
So I think you could lean in to their individualized uniqueness as a way of garnering interest.
I might also highlight some compare and contrasts between sub-types or elaborate on type relations themselves.

 

[PersonalityPrism]

I didn't feel as though it was tough or too much, personally.
Your writing style seems welcoming and caters to a wide audience while maintaining a professional tone.
I dug around and the writing consistently feels personable but not overly so, which is good imo.

My main thought about the types feels sort of Enneagram adjacent.
So I think you could lean in to their individualized uniqueness as a way of garnering interest.
I might also highlight some compare and contrasts between sub-types or elaborate on type relations themselves.

Type relations between Enneagram and PRISM? or within PRISM?

There are some within PRISM comparisons on the results and type pages but I am going to create pages that elaborate further than the tiny blurbs that are there now. There's actually a ton more that I plan to create but it takes a whole lot of time Add that with constant analysis and revision and I get mired in a lot of work that just builds and bulids the bigger PRISM gets. Not to mention my other work, school, and family

But hopefully I'll continue to trudge along and get there. Step by step. It really helps a lot to hear from people who are able to interact with PRISM and find enjoyment and utility. Plus I really like talking to people about how their minds work ,)

Here are within types relations for a Weaver type:

 

[Wyote]

or within PRISM?

This, yes, sorry for the confusion

I am going to create pages that elaborate further than the tiny blurbs that are there now

That is exactly what I was requesting so you are already on it

 

[PersonalityPrism]

Yeah, I tried to give tastes of what I had planned so that there would be various levels of substance (no matter how small to start) and then planned to expand their scope as I pushed through fleshing out the entire instrument and site

 

[knight20]

oh . how intresting was that. im inhabitant .

 

[Krypton]

 

[PersonalityPrism]

oh . how intresting was that. im inhabitant .

Nice! Did you get a chance to read your results and possibly visit the Inhabitant type page at personalityprism.app/types/inhabitant ? What did you think of what it said there?

 

[PersonalityPrism]

View attachment 102351

View attachment 102352

Interesting type for an INFJ. Did you get a chance to read your results and possibly visit the Polymath type page at personalityprism.app/types/polymath ? What did you think of what it said there?

 

[QuickTwist]

Interesting type for an INFJ. Did you get a chance to read your results and possibly visit the Polymath type page at personalityprism.app/types/polymath ? What did you think of what it said there?

What would you say are the "common types" for INFJ???

 

[PersonalityPrism]

What would you say are the "common types" for INFJ???

Here's what INFJs across the full PRISM dataset have been getting:

Inhabitant: 30%
Weaver: 23%
Guardian: 23%
Polymath: 10%
Cartographer: 10%
Mirror: 3%
Architect: 0%
Sentinel: 0%
Explorer: 0%

(n=30 of takers who self-reported MBTI as INFJ)

Considering that over 1,700 people have taken PRISM, the reporting for MBTI doesn't happen very often.

There's a lot of confounds with this. PRISM has been recalibrated multiple times over the project's life, so the numbers blend pre and
post versions and shouldn't be read as a single instrument's data. Sample size is small. But the top three (Inhabitant, Weaver,
Guardian) accounting for ~76% is a real pattern worth watching as more INFJ data comes in.

 

[PersonalityPrism]

The other consideration I forgot to mention that might be relevant is the young age of PRISM on the internet and available for people to use. PRISM has only been live for less than two months.

 

[QuickTwist]

Here's what INFJs across the full PRISM dataset have been getting:

Inhabitant: 30%
Weaver: 23%
Guardian: 23%
Polymath: 10%
Cartographer: 10%
Mirror: 3%
Architect: 0%
Sentinel: 0%
Explorer: 0%

(n=30 of takers who self-reported MBTI as INFJ)

Considering that over 1,700 people have taken PRISM, the reporting for MBTI doesn't happen very often.

There's a lot of confounds with this. PRISM has been recalibrated multiple times over the project's life, so the numbers blend pre and
post versions and shouldn't be read as a single instrument's data. Sample size is small. But the top three (Inhabitant, Weaver,
Guardian) accounting for ~76% is a real pattern worth watching as more INFJ data comes in.

Awesome. Thank you.