I watched it. It stars two very obvious hacks, neither of which are actual meteorologists.
Graham Hancock: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Hancock
Randall Carlson: http://sacredgeometryinternational.com/randall-carlson
When your source of argument is an 8 minute video starring two pseudoscientists, and that's what you're using to 'debunk' hundreds of years of meteorological data corroborated in over 100 countries...it might be time to rethink which side of the argument you're on
I wouldn’t bother wasting energy presenting any factual information or links to EH.
He will not read them or watch them.
No matter how logical and correct your sources and data are, it’s like banging your head on a brick wall over and over again.
“Open-minded” indeed.
Seriously...you would get further arguing with a box of rocks.
(Also, Graham Hancock is a theoretical idea man...some are very interesting, some are a bit of a stretch and some are waaaay out there. He has some interesting TED talks, but he mainly studies altered states of consciousness, the history of enthogens and the uses in religious practices - not global warming....idk what he has to do with proof.)
Last edited:
