Who exactly are "their own people"? Is this like a nationalistic or racialistic thing?
The people of the US police are the US public
I'd presume the police's people are the lawabidding and they arent arresting or coming upside their heads with billy clubs.
The laws are made by the rich to protect the interests of the rich
So 'law abiding' is not necessarily the best criteria to go by when evaluating someones moral standpoint. For example to be law abiding under the rule of Pol Pot is not the same as to be law abiding in iceland.....different laws, different pressures form above
When you going to break the news that it's all been engineered by some illuminati types Muir? I'm dying to hear how it was a nine foot owl worshipping lizard who pulled the trigger on that black kid, the little hoodlum had probably figured out their cloaking devices!
I have been saying on this forum for years that the police have been militarised
The 'illuminati' (or illuminated ones) is just a name people use for the east coast establishment which is to say the banking cartel behind the federal reserve bank
That cartel have a vision of a global government which they will control. The UN is the de facto world government, the land for the offices of which in New York were donated by the Rockefeller banking and oil family
In order to create their new world order they must first destroy the US constitution, disarm the US public and pacify them
The militarisation of the police is part of the preparations towards achieving that leap to world government. This will be enabled by a major crisis of some sort that will destroy the dollar and the US as a viable state. This crisis is likely to be an economic one which will lead to civil unrest at which point martial law is declared and the military and militarised police are used to quell the uprising from the public
Below is a letter from the first president of the US General Washington in which he talks about the infiltration of freemasonry by the illuminati which has lead to illuminated freemasonry...and that was back then, hundreds of years ago....it's gained a lot of ground since then:
http://skywriter2012.wordpress.com/...tters-warning-about-the-dangerous-illuminati/
The Writings of George Washington from the Original Manuscript Sources, 1745-1799.
John C. Fitzpatrick, Editor.

Mount Vernon, September 25, 1798.
Sir: Many apologies are due to you, for my not acknowledging the receipt of your obliging favour of the 22d. Ulto, and for not thanking you, at an earlier period, for the Book you had the goodness to send me
I have heard much of the nefarious, and dangerous plan, and doctrines of the Illuminati, but never saw
the Book until you were pleased to send it to me.
[SUP]9[/SUP] The same causes which have prevented my acknowledging the receipt of your letter have prevented my reading the Book, hitherto; namely, the multiplicity of matters which pressed upon me before, and the debilitated state in which I was left after, a severe fever had been removed. And which allows me to add little more now, than thanks for your kind wishes and favourable sentiments, except to correct an error you have run into, of my Presiding over the English lodges in this Country.
The fact is, I preside over none, nor have I been in one more than once or twice, within the last thirty years. I believe notwithstanding, that none of the Lodges in this Country are contaminated with the principles ascribed to the Society of the Illuminati. With respect I am &c.
[Note 9: In a letter from Snyder (Aug. 22, 1798, which is in the
Washington Papers), it is stated that this book "gives a full
Account of a Society of Free-Masons, that distinguishes itself by the Name of 'Illuminati,' whose Plan is to overturn all Government and all Religion, even natural."]
George Washington to George Washington Snyder

Mount Vernon, October 24, 1798.
Revd Sir: I have your favor of the 17th. instant before me; and my only motive to trouble you with the receipt of this letter, is to explain, and correct a mistake which I perceive the hurry in which I am obliged, often, to write letters, have led you into.
It was not my intention to doubt that, the
Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am.
The idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the
Lodges of Free Masons in
this Country had, as
Societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of seperation). That Individuals of them may have done it, or that the
founder, or
instrument employed to found, the Democratic Societies in the United States, may have had these objects; and actually had a seperation of the
People from their
Government in view, is too evident to be questioned.
My occupations are such, that but little leisure is allowed me to read News Papers, or Books of any kind; the reading of letters, and preparing answers, absorb much of my time.