[INFJ] Fully Vaccinated are rapidly developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

From the 'theexpose' article:

This is not true. The ‘theexpose’ article pretends that these UK government ‘Vaccine Surveillance’ reports show a loss of ‘immune system capability’ after taking the vaccine. What they actually discuss is decreased protections of the vaccine itself over time:

‘Several studies of vaccine effectiveness have been conducted in the UK which indicate that 2 doses of vaccine are between 65 and 95% effective at preventing symptomatic disease with COVID-19 with the Delta variant, with higher levels of protection against severe disease including hospitalisation and death. There is some evidence of waning of protection against infection and symptomatic disease over time, though protection against severe disease remains high in most groups at least 5 months after the second dose.’[2]

This just means that the vaccine’s increased protection decreases over time, not that it somehow damages people’s intrinsic ‘immune system capability’. In fact, the Vaccine Surveillance reports provide estimates of prevented cases and deaths:

‘The latest estimates indicate that the vaccination programme has directly averted over 230,800 hospitalisations. Analysis on the direct and indirect impact of the vaccination programme on infections and mortality, suggests the vaccination programme has prevented between 23.7 and 24.1 million infections and between 119,500 and 126,800 deaths.’[3]

And:

‘High levels of protection (over 90%) are also seen against mortality with all 3 vaccines and against both the Alpha and Delta variants (7, 11, 3). Relatively limited waning of protection against mortality is seen over a period of at least 5 months.’[4]

This means that if you’re vaccinated, you are ten times less likely to die from Covid, or in other words, your hitpoints go from 100 to 1,000.

The article also alleges:

Again, the Vaccine Suirveillance reports do not show this; they simply report the decline in efficacy of the vaccines over time, which is why booster shots have been mooted. On all measures they show that the vaccinated are much less likely to catch Covid, and if they do they are much less likely to be hospitalised, and if they are they are much less likely to die.

The conceit at the core of the article is a simple misrepresentation or misunderstanding of what the Vaccine Surveillance reports relate about declining efficacy. The article pretends that they show how people’s immune systems are being destroyed by vaccines; the reality is that they show that the vaccines slowly lose their efficacy over time, and need to be topped up.

Again, and as is always the case, this is misinformation easily disproven by simply following the actual sources.



[1] https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/30/gov-reports-show-fully-vaccinated-and-children-developing-ade/
[2]https://assets.publishing.service.g...992/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_38.pdf, p. 3.
[3] Ibid., p. 4.
[4] Ibid., p. 6.

 

A bit of what used to be common sense though usually applied to tech was always to wait till after a reasonable time for what issues early adopters would have and the same applies to this so no surprise there are real issues with all this. I can see elites just laughing their asses off being the social Darwinists they are plus they've made billions from vax.

 

Again, the original sources so not show this.

The article has fabricated its findings hoping that people like yourself will take on faith what is being claimed.

The UK government's 'Vaccine Surveillance' reports are available online from the '.gov' website. I urge you to look them up and see for yourself (you can follow my link above if you like).

 

Let's ask Q..they will tell us

 

LOL, maybe not Q.