this is the kind of discussion this topic warrants, not the paranoia @muir pedals.
It's not paranoia if it's true
this is the kind of discussion this topic warrants, not the paranoia @muir pedals.
mea culpa
Well, to get back to talking about the Common Core, I see some giant positives and giant negatives, and this is coming from someone who is within the system (and is completely against "the system" and "the man").
Positives:
-one could theoretically apply to any college/university/training/job and have theoretically the same chance at education as anyone else in the nation. This is highly important because just because you grew up in a poor area or a crazy-ass state like Texas wouldn't leave you far behind what is expected of you at any grade level
- schools have to be sure their curriculum isn't shit just so that their graduation rates are high (and trust me, shitty curriculum are not uncommon, but that's due to a plethora of different reasons)
- higher-order thinking is valued and important in the common core (and it's really fucking valuable to any population that can think for themselves) That question about adultery is actually really good for a fourth grader. If it weren't for marital infidelity, any fourth grader that can answer those questions is doing really well.
- there is absolutely NO common core curriculum. No rich fat-cat is deciding what your second grader is going to do on Tuesday. All of the approach is left up to the states, districts, and individual teachers. Almost all of those examples are given without context, and quite realistically, information missing. That being said, any problems in questions/approaches is left to the individual creator to defend. The CCS has no curriculum.
- when implemented with a rational approach and fedelity, it can show significant gains. My students, while their grades are lower, are showing marked improvement in high-order thinking and cognitive levels (but, this is English and not math. I cannot speak to the success of CCSS in math). Their grades are lower (and my day is filled with complaining) because they haven't ever been asked to think beyond the text.
Negatives:
- parents are stupid, like really fucking stupid, and I'm tired of wasted time listening to half-hour rants about how Obama is destroying the nation with space alien gold when what's actually pressing and important at that moment is that your kid doesn't know how to spell his name, and he's 18!
- there is almost no uniform or even rational way to truly implement CCSS into the classroom. I've spent 5 days out of the classroom this year rewriting curriculum for the district. My education in pedagogy comes from the top school in the US, so I've been asked to do a lot of the footwork. It sucks and it's exhausting. I should be with my students, not writing curiculum for classes that I won't teach
- there is no real help from the state government to implement CCSS (that I have witnessed) this means a loss of productivity at the expense of the students
- many people have no idea how to actually change and adapt curriculum to fit the CCSS
- why does the federal government have such a big say (and you can't argue it doesn't; $$$ means everything in education) in what I teach Jimmy tomorrow, and why is my job on the line if my students can't show "growth" that is measurable on a stupid fucking test given once a year? A real education is about so much more than that
Overall, I cannot speak for or against it. On one hand, I finally have the justification to ask my students to think beyond the text. I don't give a shit about whether or not you know why George killed Lennie in Of Mice and Men, but it means a whole hell of a lot if you can take a position and rationally build an argument that is sound and built off of logical thoughts and reasoning while analyzing the action of characters in the context of the social and economic background of a certain historical period all in order to persuade your reader. On the other hand, fuck standardization and standardized testing, fuck the man, and fuck being told what's important and the only "true" way to get there. Essentially, especially from the educator's standpoint, you're damned if you do and your damned if you don't.
Sidenote: the biggest threat to our nation is smartphones and the scary-fast integration of technology into our most basic functions. I'm pretty sure my kids would die if they didn't have their phones. I'm talking about immediate death.
You have my sympathies man being on the front line of this one
Common core will make kids dumber...it is about homogenising minds
The whole agenda of bill gates, the rockefellers and their other co-conspirators is to create a centrally controlled economy
Common core is about killing original thought....it is about creating the worker bees of tomorrow....creating a hive mind
They want everyone thinking the same way and that same way is going to be the way THEY want everyone to think
We're talking 'Brave New World' stuff here
They are control freaks and they want TOTAL control over every aspect of our lives ('totalitarianism') see: common core, NSA spying, codex alimentarius, agenda 21, SMART meters, the 'internet of things', RFID chips etc
You and me have been discussing this stuff here since 2009!
We were both saying the bankers were corrupt and then the banking scandals proved it, we said the politicians were corrupt then the expense scandals and other scandals proved it, we said the corporations were taking over and we have seen plenty of proof of that since, we said the state was spying on us and snowdens revelations proved it, we said there would be a backlash from the people and then we saw the occupy movement and protests all around the world etc
We've been talking about all this for years....and now it is all materialising in front of our eyes
Common core is just another aspect of this whole thing....this is a struggle over how our society is going to be shaped and run
The corporate elite...they're control freaks.....they want everything in nice neat boxes...like an electrical circuit....but we're humans damn it....we're not neat little categories...we're not robots and the more we give into these guys the more uncomfortable our daily lives are going to get because we are going to find ourselves more and more controlled, more and more stiffled, more and more hemmed in on all sides by rules, regulations and barriers both tangible and intangible...they're building us a prison...a matrix of control
what follows is an example of Muir pretending to talk about one thing but really only talking about the "hidden agenda" of the .....What ever it is
BAMF is a known and well regarded forum member who is exactly what he says he is, a well educated educator in the US.
He points out that much of what the core attempts to address needs adressing
he also points out the foibles and folly of attempting to govern education with standardized testing.
He makes clear the the Fed Gov has more influence than its dollars warrant.
But all Muir wants to do is get "behind" the issues being discussed in order to let everyone know that there is a "hidden agenda" being put forth by malicious entities bent on destroying our humanity ....much like the parents of the 18 yr old that can't spell his name.
He points out that much of what the core attempts to address needs addressing
he also points out the foibles and folly of attempting to govern education with standardized testing.
He makes clear the the Fed Gov has more influence than its dollars warrant.
I read his post, a few times. I clearly see that he is ambivalent as he clearly states. He presents himself as a person who approaches the issue without a preconceived notion as to its final merits.
Muir takes this as license to continue his demagoguery, expounding on his familiar theme of "new world order"ism
I don't accept the framing of those facts, and I don't watch any vids you post (i mean, really)
I learned my lesson watching your 9 11 vids.
There is no limit to what a fanatic will say in a webcast
none
sorry, just another win for you!I challenged you to show me a video of a plane hitting the pentagon (the most cctv'd building in the world)...i'm still waiting to see that vid stu
sorry, just another win for you!
What you are talking about is the notion that the modern world is being manipulated by a wealthy few into mass slavery
did i get that right?
did i miss something?
is there a nuance that I don't see?
I understand that in the US we need to improve education
It has to be a priority
the core is a step,is it a good one, is it bad,
how far does it go,
how do we change it?
These are worthy questions.
Is it the tool of the over lords to enslave our children?
how does that question remotely address improving our education system
it doesn't. its stupid
If a time traveller brought hitler back and put him in charge of education and he came up with a new system....would you be suspicious of it?
I have kids, they are good in school, it is a priorty
we are lucky, my wife and i are smart and educated and make good money
in my country, the chances of getting a great education where these prerequisites are not met are slim.
I would like to see that change and am open to changes, tolorant of new teaching approaches, administration approaches both nation wide and locally.
I have moved my kids out of schools that were not performing.
For me this is not an abstract fantasy nightmare that I play with in my over stimulated, super subjective mind.
Your arguments are one of a charlatan
BTW this is stupid
Actually now that I think about it more, they might be trying to have a point but it is a bit misguided.
I figured out the Jack number line problem and it's really not that hard. The idea is trying to teach how to do subtraction in chunks and find out how Jack did it wrong. Jack skipped subtracting a 10 on his number line.
The problem here is that the paradigm is trying to take the abstract and make it concrete.
I picked a random problem and did it in my head: 1000 - 983 which was quite easy to solve using chunking. The way I do it in my head is not entirely different from the number line method they tried there. The issue is that my internal visualization of it was vastly different - the visual picture of arcs bouncing over a number line is nothing like the mental picture I have. In my brain I pop the stack of numbers 'head on' so it doesn't look like a number line, it feels more like a rolling odometer. Trying to switch to this new forced visualization was quite difficult.
I can get the idea with the number line they're trying to show how to really solve the problem and not just do it by rote. It ends up confusing because understanding something itself is an abstract visualization so forcing a number line approach is not necessarily any different than any other approach.
Line arcs are obviously not numbers and cannot be numbers unless one is mentally prepared to abstractly accept them as representation of numbers. Bringing back the abacus or something would probably be more relatable, at least to transition with the understanding and not just force everybody to jump straight into it.