http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/environment/warmingplanets.html
[h=2]Global warming on other planets?[/h] compiled by Wm. Robert Johnston
last modified 15 October 2007   
Contents: 
 
   Introduction: 
  Recently reports have circulated about global warming occurring on other  planets and satellites in the solar system.  These reports have been  misunderstood by global warming believers as well as global warming  skeptics.  This article is intended to review the actual observations  regarding these planets and moons, plus place the topic in perspective.  
   Some background: 
  Believers in global warming hold to what I will call the anthropogenic  global warming hypothesis.  This involves multiple claims:  (1)  anomalous global warming is now occurring on Earth; (2) this warming is  the result of anthropogenic (man-made) greenhouse gas emissions; (3)  unnatural levels of global warming will occur during the next century;  (4) the consequences of this warming will be disastrous; and (5)  specific, immediate public policy actions are necessary to mitigate this  coming disaster.  While some claim that the scientific community agrees  with these claims, in reality scientists have come to a variety of  conclusions on all five claims, and many scientists may agree with some  but reject others.  Taken as a whole, the scientific evidence does not  support such an extreme position.  (For more on this, see 
this page). 
 Observations of several planets and moons in our solar system show  climate change is occurring on these bodies.  This is held by some  skeptics of global warming to prove that climate change is natural,  refuting claims about the nearly exclusive role of mankind in climate  change on Earth.  Believers have countered that none of these  observations have any relationship to natural influences on the Earth's  climate.  Both claims are wrong. 
 Part of the problem is a misunderstanding of natural influences on the  Earth's climate.  The total solar irradiance, or flux of solar energy  arriving at the Earth, is well measured and has varied by only about  0.1% in the last few decades.  Believers correctly point out that this  can only directly produce a temperature change of about 0.07° C on  Earth.  They err, however, in claiming or implying that this is the only  possible Sun-climate link.  Considerable evidence supports the  hypothesis that solar influences have indirect effects on the Earth's  climate, with the potential of contributing to a greater fraction of  recent observed climate change. 
 Some solar output varies by much more than 0.1%, such as UV solar  radiation and magnetic activity.  One proposed mechanism in particular  suggests that variations in solar magnetic activity affect the amount of  galactic cosmic rays reaching the Earth.  This indirectly influences  climate because these cosmic rays affect the formation of clouds which  reflect more or less sunlight back to space depending on solar activity,  consequently changing the Earth's climate.  Such indirect mechanisms  could in principle produce most of the modern observed change in global  temperature.  Studies to date show correlations supporting these claimed  mechanisms but parts of the casual link have yet to be confirmed  (unsurprisingly, research dollars are scarce when it comes to  investigating natural influences on climate). 
 The relevant point is that the Sun-climate link proposed by scientists  skeptical of global warming claims is indirect and involves mechanisms  particular to the Earth system.  The fact that we have not observed  large changes in total solar irradiance, or large climate shifts on  other planets, does nothing to refute the claim that the Sun-Earth  climate link is significant.  At the same time, some and perhaps even  all of the extraterrestrial climate shifts are from mechanisms with no  bearing on the Earth's climate.  This boils down to the fact that we  don't fully understand climate change, either here or elsewhere in the  solar system.  Those that claim we do (and particularly that we can  concentrate on a single mechanism for climate change on Earth) are  seriously wrong from a scientific perspective.  
   Climate change reports in the solar system: 
 Our ability to make long-term comparative climate observations elsewhere  in the solar system is very limited.  Only in a few cases have we had  spaceprobes observing particular planets or moons long enough to discuss  climate on timescales of decades.  Further, the outer planets have  orbital periods of decades:  this means that their seasonal cycles also  occur over decades, such that changes we observe on shorter time periods  may just be seasonal.  That said, here are reports of climate change: 
  
| Mars:  Various spacecraft have observed Mars from orbit from  1971 to the present, many able to provide a long baseline of climate  observations.  In 2001 Malin et al. (2001)  found that images of Mars' south polar cap taken one Martian year apart  showed small retreats (of about 1-3 meters) in the cover of frozen  carbon dioxide.  This frozen CO[SUB]2[/SUB] sublimes directly from ice  to gas in Mars' thin atmosphere.  Observations over the next few Martian  years' (one Martian year = 1.88 Earth years) showed continuing retreat,  resulting in expanding pits in the residual polar cap (Benson and James, 2005; Thomas et al., 2005; James et al., 2007).  This retreat has now been observed over four Martian years.  Several global warming believers have been quick to state that this is a regional climate change.  However, Fenton et al. (2006) and Fenton et al. (2007)  have identified trends in changes in the reflectivity of the surface  dust on Mars from 1976 to 2000.  From observed albedo changes they have  used models to estimate a global annual air temperature increase of  0.65° C.  The direct cause of this predicted temperature change is a  change in the distribution of darker dust on Mars' surface, and the  resulting warming could be a factor in the retreat of Mars' south polar  ice.  One proposed root cause of this climate change could be slight  shifts in Mars' axial tilt or orbital eccentricity:  such changes have  also been proposed as key drivers in changing Earth's climate between  glacial and interglacial conditions (i.e. starting and ending ice ages).   These shifts involve very long timescales on Mars as well as Earth,  making this an inadequate explanation for the changes observed  currently.  Internal variations in Mars' climate, as opposed to  influences from solar output changes, are likely at work, but this issue  is unresolved. 
 
 | [h=6]Mars in the 1970s. (Credit:  Viking Project, USGS, NASA).[/h] [h=6]Changes in Mars' south polar cap from 1999 to 2005.  (Credit:  MSSS, NASA).[/h]
 | 
[TD="width: 10"]   
[/TD]
 
|  |  | 
| Jupiter:  Jupiter is a gas giant with a thick atmosphere of  hydrogen and helium; the observable surface is actually the cloudtops.   Jupiter has been observed by several spacecraft:  flybys include  Pioneers 10 and 11 in 1972, Voyagers 1 and 2 in 1979, and New Horizons  in 2007; the Galileo orbiter provided long-term observations of Jupiter  from 1995 to 2003.  Further, the Hubble Space Telescope has been able to  observe Jupiter for years.  The atmosphere of Jupiter is very dynamic,  with cloud belts and circular storms, the largest being the Great Red  Spot, known for 300 years.  Several noteworthy changes in Jupiter's atmosphere have been observed in  recent years.  Three storms merged in 1998-2000, producing what became a  new Red Spot in 2005 (Marcus et al., 2006).  Baines et al. (2007)  describe additional recent changes in Jupiter's clouds.  While these  changes are not yet understood, the internal energy and dynamics of  Jupiter are sufficient to provide mechanisms for changes of these  magnitudes.  Periodic changes and upheavals have been observed in  Jupiter's atmosphere for many decades. 
 
 | [h=6]Jupiter  in 2000 and 2006.  The Great Red Spot is at upper right in both images.   Left image shows several white spots (left center) which merged to  form the new Red Spot, seen in the right image (left of center).   (Credit:  NASA, JPL, SSI; NASA, ESA, A. Simon-Miller).[/h]
 | 
[TD="width: 10"]  
[/TD]
 
|  |  | 
| Titan:  Titan is the largest moon of Saturn and has a thick  atmosphere of nitrogen and methane.  It was observed closeup during  Voyager 1 and 2 flybys in 1980 and 1981, and by Cassini from 2004 to the  present.  Lorenz et al. (1999)  using Hubble Space Telescope observations found that the relative  brightness of the northern and southern hemispheres had changed from  1994 to 1997.  The amount and timing of changes were different at  different wavelengths.  As they discussed, these changes are understood  to be seasonal:  Titan's seasons have a 29-year cycle, corresponding to  Saturn's orbital period about the Sun.  Cassini has since shown that  Titan's atmosphere is quite dynamic and has provided evidence of  methane-driven weather, analogous to the water-driven weather on Earth.   The changes in Titan's brightness are believed to represent changes in  haze particles, possibly from transport between hemispheres as the  seasons change. 
 | [h=6]Titan  in 1981 and 2005.  Color differences in the two images mostly result  from the different cameras used and differences in processing.  (Credit:   NASA, JPL; NASA, JPL, SSI).[/h]
 | 
[TD="width: 10"]  
[/TD]
 
|  |  | 
| Uranus:  Uranus is a gas giant with a thick atmosphere.  The  only closeup visit to Uranus was a flyby by Voyager 2 in 1986.   Earth-bound telescopes, however have revealed slight changes in the  brightness of Uranus over the last 50 years (Lockwood and Thompson, 1999; Lockwood and Jerzykiewicz, 2006; Hammel and Lockwood, 2007).   These changes are easily explanable as seasonal changes.  The seasonal  cycle of Uranus is 84 years, matching its orbital period; further,  Uranus has a high axial tilt, such that by the 1980s the south pole of  Uranus is presented almost face on towards the Sun--and at the same  time, to the Earth.  The extreme changes likely contribute to changes in  the cloud cover on Uranus. 
 | [h=6]Uranus  in 1986 and 2005.  Color differences in the two images mostly result  from the different cameras used; differences in bright cloud cover are  real.  (Credit:  NASA, JPL; NASA, ESA, M. Showalter).[/h]
 | 
[TD="width: 10"]  
[/TD]
 
|  |  | 
| Neptune:  Like Uranus, Neptune is a gas giant with a thick  atmosphere of hydrogen, helium, and methane.  Voyager 2 is the only  spacecraft to observe Neptune close up, during a flyby in 1989, but  Neptune has been long observed by Earth-bound telescopes.  Using such  observations over decades, several studies have reported on changes in  Neptune's brightness over the last 50 years (Lockwood and Thompson, 2002; Lockwood and Jerzykiewicz, 2006; Hammel and Lockwood, 2007).   Given that Neptune's seasons vary with a 164-year period, matching its  orbital period about the Sun, seasonal changes likely contribute to the  brightness changes, either through changes in the clouds in Neptune's  atmosphere, changes in the portion of Neptune visible from Earth, or  both.  However, Hammel and Lockwood (2007)  suggest that the details in the variations can't be explained as  seasonal changes alone.  They found some correlation between the  variations and changes in solar activity--along with correlations  between Neptune's brightness and the average global temperature on  Earth.  If there is a link between the Sun and the climate of Neptune,  it would be indirect:  their data indicate about a 12% brightening of  Neptune from 1950 to 2005, which would necessarily involve changes in  Neptune's clouds. 
 
 | [h=6]Neptune  in 1989 and 2005.  Differences in the two images mostly represent the  different cameras used.  (Credit:  NASA, JPL; NASA, ESA, E. Karkoschka,  H. B. Hammel).[/h]
 | 
[TD="width: 10"]  
[/TD]
 
|  |  | 
| Triton:  Triton is the largest moon of Neptune and has a  very thin atmosphere of nitrogen and methane.  Triton has only been  observed closeup during Voyager 2's brief flyby in 1989, but astronomers  have observed Triton using ground-based telescopes and the Hubble Space  Telescope orbiting Earth.  Importantly, observations of stellar  occultations by Triton (where Triton passes in front of a star) have  allowed astronomers to deduce properties of its atmosphere.  In this  way, Elliot et al. (1998)  were able to report that Triton's atmosphere had thickened between 1989  and 1997.  They found that at an altitude of 48 km above Triton's  surface, the atmospheric pressure increased about 65% from 1995 to 1997,  with the temperature increasing 2° C in that period.  This implied  roughly a doubling of the pressure at Triton's surface from 1989 to  1997, with a corresponding surface temperature increase of about 2° C.  These changes are likely seasonal changes.  Triton, like Neptune, has  seasons with a 164-year cycle.  Currently, the south pole of Triton is  in summer.  This has warmed the surface enough to vaporize nitrogen  frosts on the surface, revealing darker ices below that absorb more  sunlight and warm further.  The nitrogen contributes to a thicker  atmosphere and eventually freezes as frost in the northern hemisphere  where it is winter (in 82 years the situation with be reversed). 
 
 | [h=6]Triton in 1989.  Bright bluish areas towards the top are frost deposits.  (Credit:  NASA, JPL).[/h]
 | 
[TD="width: 10"]  
[/TD]
 
|  |  | 
| Pluto:  Pluto has a thin atmosphere of nitrogen and methane,  and its surface is covered with various ices including methane,  nitrogen, and carbon monoxide.  The orbital period of Pluto (and thus  its seasonal cycle) is 248 years, and its eccentric orbit results in  Pluto receiving much more solar radiation near perihelion (which last  occurred in 1989) then during the rest of its orbit.  Like with Triton,  astronomers have used stellar occultations to observe Pluto's  atmosphere.  From 1988 to 2002, such observations showed that the  pressure in Pluto's atmosphere at a fixed height had doubled (Elliot et al., 2003; Sicardy et al., 2003).   (This fixed height is about 10-90 km above Pluto's surface, depending  on where it's surface is.)  This was somewhat surprising, given that  Pluto was moving further from the Sun.  However, seasonal changes may be  important here, given that the peak of southern hemisphere summer on  Pluto is yet approaching.  Changes on Pluto involve the evaporation of surface ices from warming  regions to add to atmospheric gases, which can migrate and refreeze in  cooler locations.  This results in changes in the bright or dark regions  on Pluto's surface and changes in its overall reflectivity (Hansen and Paige, 1996; Brown, 2002; Pasachoff et al., 2005).   Pluto's atmosphere was observed during another stellar occultation in  2006, showing that the atmosphere has become more transparent since 1988  (Elliot et al., 2007)  but apparently no additional warming.  The warming well beyond Pluto's  perihelion could be explained by high thermal inertia or darkening of  surface materials (Pasachoff et al., 2005). 
 
 | [h=6]Estimated seasonal changes in surface temperature on Pluto at different locations.[/h]
 | 
[TD="width: 10"]  
[/TD]
  
   Conclusion: 
 To recap:  the changes observed in recent years on Jupiter, Titan,  Uranus, and Triton are understood as normal and/or seasonal changes.   Changes on Mars, Neptune, and Pluto are not fully understood: 
-  Changes in Mars' south polar cap may represent climate change, but this is likely due to phenomena particular to Mars.
-  Changes in Neptune's brightness do seem to correlate with changes in the Sun, but the linking mechanism (if any) is unknown.
-  Changes in Pluto's atmosphere seem to be seasonal; work is ongoing on this topic.
 In the cases of Mars, Neptune, and Pluto, our understanding is  incomplete.  They may prove to have no connection to mechanisms for  natural climate change on Earth.  At the same time, some global warming  believers have been too hasty in dismissing these observations.  Still,  they do demonstrate that we don't fully understand climate change.   
   References: 
-    Baines, K. H., et al., 2007, "Polar lightning and decadal-scale cloud variability on Jupiter," Science, 318:226-229.
-    Benson, J. L., and P. B. James, 2005,  "Yearly comparisons of the martian polar caps:  1999-2003 Mars Orbiter  Camera observations," Icarus, 174:513-523.
-   Brown, M. E., 2002, "Pluto and Charon: formation, seasons, composition," Annual Rev. Earth and Planetary Science, 30:307-345.
-    Elliot, J. L., et al., 1998, "Global warming on Triton," Nature, 393:765-767.
-    Elliot, J. L., et al., 2000, "The  prediction and observation of the 1997 July 18 stellar occulation by  Triton:  More evidence for increasing pressure in Triton's atmosphere," Icarus, 148:347-369.
-    Elliot, J. L., et al., 2003, "The recent expansion of Pluto's atmosphere," Nature, 424:165-168.
-    Elliot, J. L., et al., 2007, "Changes in Pluto's atmosphere:  1988-2006," Astronomical Journal, 134:1-13.
-    Fenton, L. K., P. E. Geissler, and R. M. Haberle, 2006, "Global warming on Mars," AGU Fall Meeting 2006, abstract #P23A-0047.
-    Fenton, L. K., P. E. Geissler, and R. M.  Haberle, 2007, "Global warming and climate forcing by recent albedo  changes on Mars," Nature, 446:646-649.
-    Herbert, B. D., B. Buratti, B. Schmidt,  and J. Bauer, "Photometric evidence for volatile transport on Triton,"  AGU Fall Meeting 2003, abstract #P51B-0443.
-   Hammel, H. B., and G. W. Lockwood, 2007, "Long-term atmospheric variability on Uranus and Neptune," Icarus, 186:291-301.
-    Hammel, H. B., and G. W. Lockwood, 2007,  "Suggestive correlations between the brightness of Neptune, solar  variability, and Earth's temperature," Geophysical Research Letters, 34:L08203.
-    Hansen, C. J., and D. A. Paige, 1996, "Seasonal nitrogen cycles on Pluto," Icarus, 120:247-265.
-    James, P. B., P. C. Thomas, M. J. Wolff,  and B. P. Bonev, 2007, "MOC observations of four Mars year variations  in the south polar residual cap of Mars," Icarus, forthcoming.
-   Lockwood, G. W., and D. T. Thompson, 1999, "Photometric variability of Uranus, 1972-1996," Icarus, 137:2-12.
-    Lorenz, R. D., M. T. Lemmon, P. H.  Smith, and G. W. Lockwood, 1999, "Seasonal change on Titan observed with  the Hubble Space Telescope WFPC-2," Icarus, 142:391-401.
-    Lockwood, G. W., and D. T. Thompson, 2002, "Photometric variability of Neptune, 1972-2000," Icarus, 156:37-51.
-    Lockwood, G. W., and M. Jerzykiewicz, 2006, "Photometric variability of Uranus and Neptune, 1950-2004," Icarus, 180:442-452.
-    Malin, M. C., M. A. Caplinger, and S. D.  Davis, 2001, "Observational evidence for an active surface reservoir of  solid carbon dioxide on Mars," Science, 294:2146-2149.
-    Marcus, P., et al., 2006, "Velocities  and temperatures of Jupiter's Great Red Spot and the New Red Oval and  their implications for global climate change," Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 38:554.
-    Olkin, C. B., et al., 1997, "The thermal structure of Triton's atmosphere:  results from the 1993 and 1995 occultations," Icarus, 129:178-201.
-    Pasachoff, J. M., et al., 2005, "The structure of Pluto's atmosphere from the 2002 August 21 stellar occultation," Astrophysical Journal, 129:1718-1723.
-    Sicardy, B., et al., 2003, "Large changes in Pluto's atmosphere as revealed by recent stellar occultations," Nature, 424:168-170.
-    Thomas, P. C., et al., 2005, "South polar residual cap of Mars:  Features, stratigraphy, and changes," Icarus, 174:535-559.
  © 2007 by Wm. Robert Johnston.
Last modified 15 October 2007.
Return to 
Home.  Return to 
Environmental Topics.