Recent content by Matt3737

As it should be!

I think being unintelligible would be a much quicker suicide than being difficult to understand. I can't say whether it should or should not be easy to understand, but I believe all philosophy is capable of being easily understood (depending on how "ease" and "understand" are being employed).

What's there to know?

*Posits a purely subjective standard for psychology, then proceeds to go on an objective styled monologue to prop up their own views.* Uh huh....whatever you say must be true, I guess.

I'm sorry, but no. That isn't true. https://www.simplypsychology.org/psyche.html

@biwaly It sounds like you are conflating Freud's concept of the 'ego' with the 'id'. Also suggesting what is or is not necessary is contradictory to perceiving reality as it is.

Yeah, something like that can be extremely enlightening and can really expand one's mind to what it's capable of, but it's still a temporary experience. It may just be me quibbling over the term and its definition though. I like the term "ego loss" though. I think that might be a better term as...

I don't believe in ego death. Just death. The belief in it strikes me as being a paradoxical ego fulfillment similar to false humility. You can be aware of your ego and accept its existence (this may be considered the closest state to ego death or even equivalent with it in a more metaphorical...

I'm not your son, asshole.

muir? Is that you?

Shave your pubes into a Hitler 'stache.