Recent content by 1104

i think that's a good idea, just in case.

alright. these were the assumptions i made: 1) you will make the connection between 3 occurrences of "natural" 2) you know that very rarely are people overtly misogynistic these days, so you will consider alternative meanings before sounding the alarm neither person gave me the benefit of the...

it was clear in the first place. other than three new words (independent, considered, almost), my final post was almost identical to what i had been saying over and over again: "woman are historically inferior. it's natural, but natural has nothing to do with moral/right." why am i making an...

oh shut up. do you leap on everything called "black" and shout "that's racist"? animals respond to signals, rather than consider the context. i say sit, a dog sits, even if a car's about to hit him. don't be stupid. again: in every culture, women were historically inferior. think about it...

because i assumed you were capable of thought beyond that of an animal. in nearly every culture, females were historically inferior. it occurred naturally. that doesn't make it right. you would have seen my point if you hadn't entertained your instinctive reaction. i know, Black Friday is so...

Indifferent. that was a perfectly vanilla quiz. you think the creator is involved in politics?

perhaps you should explore different interpretations before pressing the panic button. read it again, and be less naive.

to me it's much like the education system. it has done its job if "you will succeed if you try" is still true. its purpose is to give the opportunity to be competent, not to make sure you're competent. likewise, everyone deserves opportunity. happiness is up to the individual. my real answer is...

whether or not monogamy "makes sense" isn't relevant. it seems to me that if you legally commit to something, that's your fault. otherwise, it seems historically natural for a human to be committed to one person at a time. in modernity, the principle is almost identical to that in choosing a...

eh? eh?

rather than establish an updated meaning for each individual word, i'd bring attention to the elasticity of language and the nature of semantics. "fag" without context is just a noise or ink on paper. it's a vehicle of intent, not the intent itself.

i live in a liberal college town where "individuality" is highly valued. naturally, people appropriate this by dying their hair weird colors, adopting Eastern religion, and scratching anarchy symbols onto their notebooks. they are nonetheless devoid of character, and i've become deeply wary...

Ta-dah, your personality type is ENFP! Extraverted (E) 50% Introverted (I) 50% Intuitive (N) 59% Sensing (S) 41% Feeling (F) 55% Thinking (T) 45% Perceiving (P) 73% Judging (J) 27%

David Bowie- ISTP or INFJ. Dennis DeYoung- his ego is enormous. no, you're right. based on his music, a sensor as well. Gerard Way based on mannerisms and an interview. he has good control of his body, and was compelled to change his lifestyle after 9/11. ENFJ? YouTube- NME Video: My Chemical...

waiting