Yes, but that ship sailed long ago. In the United States of America, the individual championing has been relentless. This is an essential element of the American myth, and furthermore, absolute atomization serves the interests of those in power. It is said no person stands alone, but if they believe they do, they accept their lack of agency with a quiet despair.Would a simple "we" did this, or "together, we", crack his mentality?
Sometimes I realize this is the soup we all live in. I've found it insightful to read on Ainslie McLeod's young soul society and similar from Michael Teachings...whether or not you'd see these as pseudo or actually good metaphysical sources...they illustrate this mass "I" or I/You mindset.From over here in the UK it looks to me that Trump is only the shell of the problem. The heart of it is the world view of the folks who vote for him, and the utter poverty of quality of a realistic Democrat rival to challenge him for the hearts of your people.
But this isn’t coming from a land of superior political governance - we have our very own brand of self-deluded idiots running the UK who are busy wrecking our society day by day.
The guys at the current summit in China must think their boat’s come in.
There's loads on line about mass psychosis and existential inauthenticity, isn't there? But there's a trap in the way folks react to demagogues like Trump, which is that, in jumping outside the boundaries of the collective thinking that he represents, many folks simply jump into a different collective that opposes him, but which is just as collective and just as inauthentic.Sometimes I realize this is the soup we all live in. I've found it insightful to read on Ainslie McLeod's young soul society and similar from Michael Teachings...whether or not you'd see these as pseudo or actually good metaphysical sources...they illustrate this mass "I" or I/You mindset.
I think I might have done the same if I were a USA voter - I suspect that many folks in your country were voting against what looked like more and more chaos rather than for tooth and claw Trump as such. He was the better choice of two less than perfect options, which says such a lot.I voted for him, but it was a vote against what we had.