Offensive language is almost unavoidable when discussing issues we feel strongly about. I do my best to accept this and move on. Some will say that my ignorance is "abhorrently disgusting" and that's that.
Last edited:
Are you trying to justify the notion that people should not be permitted to express their opinions in their own words, using the full breadth of the English language?
Are you advocating that having a list of forbidden words/phrases would be reasonable?
Are you advocating, in the absence of the existence of a lexicon of forbidden expressions, that restricting a forum member's language, after the fact, is not in itself censorious?
I'm saying that inflammatory remarks or hate speech is likely to be censored by administrators/moderators. I'm not accusing anyone of using such words, just that there is, in reality, a limit to free speech on this forum, most forums, places of employment, when you're in other people's home, etc. The main purpose of free speech (there are others) is to protect against persecution for dissent against government .
I don't think anyone is being censored here and it is a complete farce to think that someone being called out for their choice of words on an internet forum is equivalent to living in an Orwellian dictatorship.
The person's right to speak MUST be heard, no matter how deeply his or her opinions offend you. I cannot stress this enough. You people think me mentioning Social Justice Warriors is such a wicked thing to say?
I'm saying that inflammatory remarks or hate speech is likely to be censored by administrators/moderators. I'm not accusing anyone of using such words, just that there is, in reality, a limit to free speech on this forum, most forums, places of employment, when you're in other people's home, etc. The main purpose of free speech (there are others) is to protect against persecution for dissent against government .
I don't think anyone is being censored here and it is a complete farce to think that someone being called out for their choice of words on an internet forum is equivalent to living in an Orwellian dictatorship.
I don't think that. I wasn't offended by this comment(I wasn't sure if you were being facetious or not), but the comment did categorize the content of the video and myself with the SJWs without first watching the video. This view was incorrect, but it wasn't a big deal to me personally. I figured maybe you would comment more later and you did, and it was a well articulated argument for capitalism. But when I read that you felt people were trying to censor you, I thought it was a bit ironic. Ironic because you accused another poster of trying to stifle your language with theirs, when your SJW statement could be seen as doing the exact same thing to me. It borders on hypocrisy really. That's why I don't understand the rant about censorship. I am only playing devils advocate here, but your "language" could be seen as equally stifling.
I really do not have anything more to say. I certainly don't want you or anyone else censored. I expect people will mostly use their good judgement and be considerate to one another, agree to disagree, etc. I think everyone, including you, probably want to just move forward anyways because how much fun can anyone really be having by beating a long-dead horse with a stick
Good day
You know what helps when you're trying to have a good day, [MENTION=13855]JJJA[/MENTION]?
Corgis.
We're not going to let someone try to bring us down.Meanwhile, to everyone:
We're not going to let someone try to bring us down.
We're not going to let someone try to bring us down.That's exactly what that says, so we agree, don't let people bring you down. Did you interpret it a different way?
We're not going to let someone try to bring us down.
Only for the top-dog.Members love defending the underdog. That can be a problem.
Members love defending the [strike]under[/strike]dog.