Vaccines Debate

[muir]

http://www.naturalnews.com/046732_MMR_vaccines_CNN_CDC_whistleblower.html

[h=1]CNN caught in denial over MMR vaccines even as CDC whistleblower confesses to scientific fraud[/h] Thursday, September 04, 2014 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer

After more than a week of total silence by the mainstream media, CNN has finally admitted that a landmark study recently published in a top scientific journal solidifies a link between the MMR vaccine and autism. But this was only after the journal that first published the study, Translational Neurodegeneration, arbitrarily decided to pull it on spurious claims that its findings "may not be in the public interest," suddenly making the topic "newsworthy."

Failing to even get the facts straight, a CNN report by Debra Goldschmidt claims that the study by Dr. Brian Hooker from the Focus Autism Foundation (FAF) uncovered a link between the MMR vaccine and autism in African American boys given the shot before the age of two -- it was actually before the age of three, Ms. Goldschmidt. The real issue, however, is not this shoddy reporting by CNN, but the fact that a prominent journal claiming to be committed to science decided to pull a study simply because its findings threaten to topple the golden calf of vaccination.

In case you missed it, a top U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) scientist-turned-whistleblower recently came forward with some bombshells about his involvement in a decades-long coverup concerning MMR. In short, top CDC officials were instructed to manipulate and withhold data linking MMR to autism, resulting in the declaration that MMR is safe even after it was shown that some children are up to 340 percent more likely to develop autism if they receive the shot before 36 months of age.

Dr. William Thompson was one such CDC official who, apparently plagued by guilt, decided to tell all as part of a new study that completely deconstructs the myth that MMR is safe. That study was published earlier this summer in Translational Neurodegeneration, only to be later retracted for its controversial findings. And only then did the mainstream media pick up the story, implying along the way that, because the study was retracted, it must be false.

[h=1]Translational Neurodegeneration joins coverup by censoring truth about MMR vaccine[/h] But as pointed out in a scathing letter by GreenMedInfo's Sayer Ji to the editor-in-chief of Translational Neurodegeneration, Professor Shengdi Chen, studies aren't pulled from reputable journals simply due to the fact that their findings are unpopular. Unless there is evidence of fraud or malfeasance, there is never a valid reason to pull a study -- that is, unless the journal itself is fraudulent.

"You should know that your decision is being perceived as a threat to the credibility of your journal and career as an esteemed scientist," wrote Ji to Prof. Chen, noting that the legitimacy of Translational Neurodegeneration as an honest, scientific journal is now being questioned by scientists, journalists and members of the legal community.

"Given the legal implications of your decision to potentially collude with a now verified cover-up involving the falsification of scientific data related to vaccine science and autism, would you be willing to make a statement to defend your decision?"

As of this writing, Prof. Chen has not responded to the letter. But the world is watching, despite CNN's dismissal of the controversy, to see whether or not this massive fraud is handled with integrity, or if the vaccine industry is once again coddled and protected from scrutiny. If the latter proves to be true, you can be sure that a major public backlash is coming against the CDC and its vaccination racket.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.greenmedinfo.com

http://www.cnn.com

http://science.naturalnews.com

http://science.naturalnews.com

​

​

 

[muir]

http://www.naturalnews.com/033447_Institute_of_Medicine_vaccines.html

[h=1]Institute of Medicine adverse reactions report admits MMR vaccines cause measles, seizures, anaphylaxis and other health problems[/h]

Sunday, August 28, 2011 by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

The Institute of Medicine, which has long functioned as a front group for the pharmaceutical industry and receives tens of millions of dollars in annual funding from drug companies and global elitists (like Bill Gates, Ted Turner, etc.), has issued a report that declares the MMR vaccine is not linked to autism. This is now being widely reported in the conventional (controlled) media, which isn't telling you the real story behind this report.

What's the real story? That this IOM report, even though it goes out of its way to excuse vaccines and dismiss safety concerns, still openly admits that vaccines cause measles, febrile seizures, anaphylactic shock and other potentially fatal side effects. It also admits that other vaccines are linked to a whole host of bizarre side effects, including skin lesions, difficulty breathing and live virus infections (see complete list, below).

Furthermore, the conclusion that "vaccines do not cause autism" is erroneous, as the IOM did not interview even a single parent of an autistic child and did not conduct a medical review of any autistic children whatsoever. Instead, the IOM claims to have reviewed thousands of vaccine papers published in conventional medical journals -- yes, the very same medical journals that are practically run by pharmaceutical interests and have been caught publishing "scientific" articles that were really fraudulently ghostwritten by drug company hacks. (http://www.naturalnews.com/029160_medical_jo...)

In layman's terms, this is what's known as a "scientific circle jerk" where one group of bought-off scientists quotes another group of bought-off scientists as "authorities" even though they all parrot the same medical quackery of their masters -- the pharmaceutical companies.

[h=1]Predictably, the old dinosaur media spins the report into a complete lie[/h]Regardless of the fact that the IOM report found a long list of side effects to be "convincingly" linked to vaccines (which is remarkable, given the IOM's pro-vaccine slant, as revealed below), the mainstream media went out of its way to twist the story around and declare vaccines are perfectly safe!

Forbes Magazine, which has long been a zombie mouthpiece for pharmaceutical business interests, ran with the headline, "Report Finds Few Side Effects For Vaccines." (Not true. The report actually found an alarming number of side effects for vaccines.)

The Sydney Morning Herald, the pro-pharma quack rag of Australia, declared "Vaccine gets another clean bill of health, but no one is listening." (A total and deliberate lie by a newspaper that maliciously lies to its Australian readers on a regular basis.)

NPR, which no one even expects to honestly report a story anymore, declared, "Report: Vaccines Are Safe, Hazards Few And Far Between." Voice of America parroted, "US Study: Vaccines are Safe." (Again, a complete fabrication. Did they even read the IOM's report?)

The trouble, of course, is that all these headlines are really more like headLIES. They fail to report what the IoM actually published in its own conclusions, and even that is a distorted version of the truth of how dangerous vaccines really are. But it surprises no one to see conventional media -- the presstitutes -- covering up the crimes of the deadly vaccine industry. They're all in this together, of course. It's the pharma interests that buy a significant portion of the advertising which keeps these rags in business, and if they actually told the truth about the dangers of drugs and vaccines, drug companies would pull their ads and many of these media outlets would simply collapse into financial insolvency (which is actually what they deserve, given that they only serve their corporate masters and contribute nothing to the people of society).

So they keep parroting the lies of Big Pharma and the distortions of the IoM, which as you will soon see, is an entirely untrustworthy organization that has a history of being involved in illegal medical experiments and crimes against humanity, including having its members play a role in the illegal syphilis medical experiments on Guatemalan prisoners.

[h=1]A brief history of the Institute of Medicine[/h]The IoM is the same group, you may recall, that recently issued an utterly false and misleading report on vitamin D, claiming that people should take no more than 600 IUs of vitamin D a day. It then went on to warn people against "megadosing" on vitamin D, thereby contributing to the ongoing vitamin D deficiencies that are the main cause of cancer in America today. (http://www.naturalnews.com/030598_vitamin_D_...)

(In truth, most people need 10,000 IUs of vitamin D a day just to maintain healthy levels.)

This was all part of the 2010 report called, "Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D" in which the IoM utter failed to find any link whatsoever between vitamin D and cancer (huh?), and then reluctantly admitted that vitamin D may have something to do with bone health, but nothing more. This is a classic example of total pseudoscientific quackery being put out to promote nutritional deficiencies so that the pharmaceutical industry can rake in more profits. (http://www.anh-usa.org/action-alert-is-the-i...)

Remember, Big Pharma is a huge financial supporter of the IoM. Full details on the IoM's financial ties will shortly be reported here on NaturalNews, where you will learn that individuals like Margaret Hamburg, the head of the criminal FDA, personally gave the IoM more than $100,000. (So did Bill Gates, Ted Turner and others.)

The IoM is also the same group that declared Agent Orange was safe for U.S. veterans who fought in Vietnam. In nearly every report it has issued over the years, the IoM has pushed a pro-pharma agenda while denying the reality of dangerous chemicals. Yet, somehow, the IoM is widely quoted by the old media (the dinosaur media, the presstitutes) as if it were a "scientific" organization reaching "scientific" conclusions, independent of industry influence.

Didn't any of the presstitutes actually check who funds the IoM? Of course not. The age of old media journalists actually asking intelligent questions has long faded into history. Now, they simply vomit up whatever disinfo they've been spoon fed by the establishment, and they rely on the gullibility of their fluoridated, mind-numbed readers to buy whatever propaganda they're spewing.

[h=1]The IoM's role in criminal, government-run human medical experiments[/h]The IoM, by the way, was also directly involved in the criminal medical experiments conducted on Guatemalan prisoners, a "dark chapter" of conventional medical history that came to light in late 2010 (http://www.naturalnews.com/029924_medical_ex...).

When the truth about these experiments became known (oops! Somebody found out!), President Obama was forced to issue a public apology and organize an investigation. He appointed the Institute of Medicine -- a "prestigious" organization, if you can believe that -- to lead the investigation.

But the IoM had to recuse itself from the investigation, admitting that some of its own people were the same people who conducted the illegal medical experiments while working for the NIH. The Guatemalan medical experiments, you see, were a U.S. government funded operation conducted under the NIH, and the IoM has strong financial ties to the government, receiving as much as 64.9% of its funding from government sources (details on that to be published here on NaturalNews shortly).

This was all admitted in a published paper called "U.S. reviews human trial participant
protections." (The Lancet, Volume 376, Issue 9757, Pages 1975 - 1976, Dec. 11, 2010).

This paper declares, "In a sign of just how thoroughly enmeshed in medical establishment approval the Guatemala study was, the IoM had to decline the assignment, citing "overlapping appointments" in the 1940s between individuals on an IoM subcommittee and the NIH Study Section on Syphilis. The fact-finding task has now been transferred to the bioethics committee." (http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/art...)62247-7/fulltext)

This was also reported in Jerry Leonards Public Health Alert (www.PublicHealthAlert.org), in a special article covering the CDC Tuskegee experiments and ongoing biowarfare research being conducted covertly by the U.S. government and its various "medical" front groups (NIH, IoM, CDC, NCI, etc.)

Read the full report from Jerry Leonards at:
http://www.publichealthalert.org/Articles/mi...

So keep all this in mind about the history of the IoM when you read its paper on vaccines. We're talking about an organization that promotes nutritional deficiencies, that utterly ignores the solid science on disease prevention with nutrition, and that was so deeply involved in the illegal, government-run medical experiments on Guatemalan prisoners that it had to remove itself from the bioethics investigative committee appointed to investigate the matter. The word "ethics" doesn't even belong in the same paragraph as the Institute of Medicine.

The IoM is also largely funded by both military government interests (including funds from the Department of Defense, which we will explain later), pharmaceutical interests (it takes money from all the top Big Pharma companies) and top global elitists like Bill Gates who are openly calling for the use of vaccines to "reduce world population by 10 to 15 percent." (http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_B...)

Today, this same pharmaceutically prostituted organization that lied to the nation about vitamin D has issued its report called "Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality".

Let's see what this report really says:

[h=1]What the IOM report on vaccines reveals about deadly vaccines[/h]To begin, you can download and view the entire report yourself at:
http://naturalnews.com/files/Adverse-Effects...

Here are several important things you need to know about this report -- things that none of the mainstream presstitutes will dare tell you:

#1 - The IOM vaccine report was reviewed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as well as a military weapons manufacturer

On page 8 of the report, you will see that it was reviewed by Chris Wilson from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, a vaccine front group that openly pushes for global population reduction through vaccines and infertility technologies (http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_B...).

Secondly, this IOM report was reviewed by Sam Shekar from the military defense contractor Northrop Grumman, a weapons manufacturer and military technology engineering company that received a $5 billion grant from the CDC to run a vaccine information technology program (which will likely be used to track vaccine recipients in much the same way that IBM sold its technology to the Nazi regime in World War II to track Jewish prisoners as they were hauled off to concentration camps). (http://www.ibmandtheholocaust.com/home.php)

#2 - The IOM conducted NO NEW STUDIES for this report

Instead, it was merely a compilation of 12,000 existing vaccines studies published in all the corrupt mainstream medical journals which are pro-vaccine propaganda rags that routinely engage in bribery, corruption, fraudulent science and the ghost writing of fraudulent "scientific papers" that were really written by Big Pharma propagandists (http://www.naturalnews.com/029160_medical_jo...).

The British Medical Journal in particular has been widely discredited over its fictitious and provably false allegations against Dr. Andrew Wakefield (http://www.naturalnews.com/031116_Dr_Andrew_...).

The IoM, however, took all the medical journals are honest, trustworthy sources! ...even though we know conventional medical journals are the epitome of modern pharmaceutical quackery parading around as science. For the IoM to use medical journals as "sources" for any study is sort of like police departments hiring convicted felons to be detectives.

All of us know very well that relying on the conventional medical industry's own studies as a source of information about the dangers of the conventional medical industry's own products is just flat-out stupid. If you're going to have an honest assessment of the dangers of vaccines, you don't use the for-profit vaccine industry as your source of information! The medical journals, as we all know, are utterly corrupted and controlled by the drug companies that manufacture and sell all these vaccines in the first place. Nearly all conventional medical journals are packed with drug company ads that provide the bulk of the funding for their operations.

So it makes no difference that the IoM claims to have reviewed "12,000 studies." Most of those 12,000 studies are still slanted propaganda pieces because they were funded by the vaccine companies and published by what are essentially "vaccine journals" that promote the interests of vaccine companies. The IoM might as well claim it looked at a "gajillion studies!"

If you really want to find out what vaccines cause in children, you need to go talk to the parents of autistic children -- something that Dr. Andrew Wakefield did, much to the horror of the medical establishment which then went out of its way to utterly defame and denigrate Dr. Wakefield for daring to suggest that vaccines might produce harmful gastrointestinal effects. (Dr. Wakefield, for the record, has never suggested that vaccines cause autism. That allegation is a total piece of fiction invented by the medical establishment and the old media presstitutes.)

The IoM, for the record, did not talk to a single child or a single parent as part of this entire review (see below). And there is absolutely no indication that the IoM has any intention whatsoever to ever talk to any parent of an autistic child and gather reliable information from the people directly impacted by this neurological disorder which seems to happen to many children right after being vaccinated.

#3 - The IOM study openly admits it did not consider the "benefits" of vaccines at all

The old media is widely reporting that this IOM report proves vaccines are "safe" and "effective," and yet the IOM openly states that its report didn't assess vaccine benefits at all.

"We were not charged with assessing the benefits of vaccines, with weighing benefits and costs, or with deciding how, when, and to whom vaccines should be administered. The committee was not charged with making vaccine policy," says Ellen Wright Clayton of the Chair Committee to Review Adverse Effects of Vaccines.

The report itself says, "The 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine is covered by the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, and evidence about its safety is not covered in this report." (Yeah, no kidding, because its safety record is so atrocious that opening that can of worms would destroy their whole argument that vaccines have few side effects...)

Influenza vaccines are the most dangerous vaccines of all, having been proven to actually promote influenza and weaken immune defenses against future infections (http://www.naturalnews.com/029641_vaccines_j...). That's why every winter, the vast majority of people who catch the flu are the very same people who were vaccinated against the flu!

(Most flu deaths occur in people who received flu vaccinations. There's another little factoid the old dinosaur media will never -- never! -- put into print.)

#4 - The IoM admits it did not have accurate data

In the introduction to the report, the IoM openly admits it simply doesn't have enough data to accurately assess the totality of vaccine adverse reactions.

"...we learned some lessons that may be of value for future efforts to evaluate vaccine safety. One is that some issues simply cannot be resolved with currently available epidemiologic data..." says the report.

In another bit of twisted logic, the IoM effectively admits that many vaccine side effects are simply blamed on the "natural infection." Read the following statement from the IoM and note how it makes absolutely no sense and yet is somehow trying to shift blame away from vaccines:

"Some adverse events caused by vaccines are also caused by the natural infection. These effects often cannot be detected by epidemiologic methods, which typically cannot distinguish between the adverse events that are caused by the vaccine itself and the decrease in adverse events due to the decreased rate of natural infection."

#5 - The IoM openly admits it threw out all data covering long-term adverse events

All the conclusions of the IoM are based entirely on short-term adverse reactions from single vaccines. The IoM's report in no way considered long-term adverse reactions or the cumulative effects of multiple vaccines compromising the immune system or nervous system.

In fact, the IoM admits in its report that "Case descriptions that did not have the three basic elements described above were not considered in the mechanistic weight-of-evidence assessments." One of those three elements was a "specified and reasonable time interval (i.e., temporality or latency) between vaccination and symptoms." But the IoM failed to define this "temporality," stating that "What constitutes reasonable latency will vary across vaccines and across adverse events."

This means the IoM could simply throw out any evidence it wanted by claiming the latency was too long between the vaccine injection and the appearance of side effects. If autism kicks in 15 days after a vaccine injection, for example, the IoM could simply disregard it. If a child suffered neurological damage following a vaccine but the doctor reporting the adverse effects did not note how many hours transpired between the vaccine shot and the onset of neurological symptoms, that data was also thrown out.

This is how modern medical "science" -- which is really just for-profit quackery -- always seems to engineer the study results it wants. It simply throws out all the data that doesn't fit its pre-determined conclusions! Or, in the case of pharma researchers who work for Merck and Pfizer, they just fabricate whatever data they want and then get that published in the mainstream medical journals (http://www.naturalnews.com/028194_Scott_Reub...).

#6 - The IoM study still admits that vaccines cause infectious disease!

This is the truly amazing part about all this. The old dinosaur media (presstitutes run by globalists) is widely reporting this IoM story as if it declares vaccines to be safe. And yet they haven't even read the report! Because on page 574, this IoM report directly declares that MMR vaccines cause measles! It describes the evidence as "convincingly supports" and says the mechanistic assessment is "strong."

[h=1]The real conclusions of the Institute of Medicine report on vaccine adverse reactions[/h]Here are some of the other conclusions of the IOM's report, which the old dinosaur media outright refuses to tell you because they are all controlled by pharmaceutical interests:

• MMR vaccine is "convincingly" linked to causing measles. (Just as we told you here on NaturalNews, the vaccine is what's causing the disease.)

• MMR vaccine is "convincingly" linked to causing febrile seizure, just as we also reported here on NaturalNews.

• MMR vaccine is "convincingly" linked to causing anaphylaxis, a life-threatening allergic reaction that can result in death within minutes. This is what kills many young children who are injected with MMR vaccines.

• MMR vaccine is likely linked to causing transient arthralgia in women and children.

• Varicella vaccine is "convincingly" linked to causing Disseminated Oka VZV, a viral disease (Varicella Zoster Virus) which causes skin lesions and can also infect the lungs and brain. The fact that this vaccine is causing VZV infections is proof that the vaccines contain live viruses!

• Varicella vaccine is "convincingly" linked to causing Vaccine Strain Viral Reactivation, meaning the vaccine contains live viruses that are reactivated in the human host, multiplying and causing widespread infections.

• Varicella vaccine is "convincingly" linked to causing anaphylaxis, the life-threatening allergic reaction mentioned above.

• The influenza vaccine is "convincingly" linked to causing anaphylaxis, which is why influenza vaccines have killed so many children (http://www.naturalnews.com/029586_Australia_...).

• The influenza vaccine likely causes Oculorespiratory Syndrome, a vaccine reaction described as causing "bilateral conjunctivitis, facial edema, and upper respiratory symptoms." Once again, this is proof that the vaccine itself is dangerous to humans.

• The Hepatitis B vaccine is "convincingly" linked to causing anaphylaxis.

• The HPV vaccine (for cervical cancer) is also likely linked to causing anaphylaxis.

• The TT (Tetanus Toxoid) vaccine is also likely linked to causing anaphylaxis.

• The Meningo-Coccal vaccine is "convincingly" linked to causing anaphylaxis.

• Vaccine injections (of all kinds) are "convincingly" linked to causing Deltoid Bursitis (severe pain and swelling at the injection sight) and Syncope (loss of consciousness). These are no doubt caused by the toxic chemical adjuvants which are added to vaccines to invoke an immune reaction. These adjuvants are known neurotoxins (http://www.naturalnews.com/026717_vaccine_fl...).

Not surprisingly, this IoM report completely threw out any links between vaccines and:

• Guillain-Barre Syndrome
• Multiple Sclerosis
• Chronic Inflammatory Disseminated Polyneuropathy
• Asthma Exacerbation
• Autism
• Lupus
• Type-1 diabetes
• Rheumatoid arthritis
• Autoimmune hepatitis
• Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
• Fibromyalgia
• Meningitis
• Myocardial Infarction
• Infantile spasms
• Optic neuritis
• Bell's Palsy
• Arthropathy
• Encephalopathy
• Transverse myelitis
• Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

These were thrown out based on a "lack of sufficient evidence," says the IoM. But remember: It's only sources of evidence were the corrupt, quacked-out medical journals! Relying on medical journals to accurately report vaccine side effects is sort of like relying on the Federal Reserve to accurately report what it's doing with all the bailout money it keeps printing. It's all one grand orgy of secrecy and corruption constructed for the sole purpose of pushing a globalist control agenda.

Anyone with even a hint of human intelligence knows that the conventional medical industry is not a good source of information for determining the dangers of the products manufactured and sold by the conventional medical industry! Only a fool -- or a mainstream media journalist -- would even believe such a thing.

[h=1]When will we have a truly independent review of vaccines?[/h]If you want to seriously investigate the safety of vaccines, you need an independent review of the evidence; meaning you need reviewers from outside the system to look into all the evidence, including interviewing the parents of autistic children and, of course, comparing the outcomes of vaccinated children versus non-vaccinated children.

That's something the vaccine industry has absolutely refused to do, not surprisingly. Any honest comparison would immediately reveal vaccines to be harmful and even deadly. Plus, they simply don't work. Most outbreaks of infectious disease happen among those children already vaccinated.

And that's no coincidence, either. As it turns out, vaccines almost always contain live viruses that spread disease. Vaccines, ultimately, are a public health hoax through which infectious disease is introduced to the population so that more people can be made sick, thereby killing some (Bill Gates' population control agenda) while sending the rest to the hospital for treatment (satisfying the corporate profit agenda).

The IoM, in releasing its conclusions on vaccine adverse events, only cements its position in the history of medicine as an obvious pharmaceutical co-conspirator with absolutely zero scientific credibility.

[h=1]Why vaccine-pushing scientists are criminals who threaten human life[/h]If you believe the IoM, you should stop taking vitamin D and start getting injected with more vaccines. Interestingly, a great many "scientists" and conventional medical pushers quite literally believe that, and they are dying in droves. Dead doctors don't lie, they say, and the more these doctors take the very medicine they promote, the more quickly they expire.

That's a good thing, in a way, as is explained in the book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. It explains that science only advances as quickly as the dogmatic defenders of the status quo bite the big one and croak (or some similar phrase stated a bit more eloquently). It is a fact of reality that the faster today's vaccine-pushing doctors die, the sooner we can get to honest science and truly advanced medicine that respects the human immune system rather than attacking it with toxic chemicals and foreign DNA / RNA invasions -- not to mention the neurotoxic aluminum, thimerosal and polysorbate that's also added to vaccines.

Vaccine-pimping doctors are killing themselves by taking Big Pharma medications and vaccines while avoiding superfoods and nutritional therapies. Thus, they deserve the very fate they are creating for themselves -- one of pain, suffering and a timely death by which the removal of their dishonest intellectual obfuscations from the pool of medical mythology actually benefits human civilization.

Sometimes, truly stated, the most beneficial thing a disinformation "scientist" can do for the future of life on planet earth is to take a very short leap off a very tall building. Gravity and nature will do the rest, which is all the more fitting since it proves that these mad reductionist mind-benders can't escape the laws of nature after all.

As far as the IoM goes, here at NaturalNews, we are about to expose the entire history of this Big Pharma front group, including the funding sources of the IoM and its globalist agenda of destroying human life by promoting sickness and disease. Watch for that in upcoming articles here on NaturalNews.

​

​

 

[muir]

http://www.naturalnews.com/033455_Institute_of_Medicine_vaccines.html

[h=1]NaturalNews exposes secret vaccine industry ties and military involvement with Institute of Medicine, reveals fatal conflicts of interest at IoM[/h]

Monday, August 29, 2011 by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

The Institute of Medicine is suddenly in the news following the release of its vaccine "adverse events" research which found that MMR vaccines actually cause measles, seizures and anaphylactic shock. The old media predictably distorted the story and used it to deceptively announce that "vaccines are not linked to autism!"

In falsely reporting this study from the IoM, however, the old media reporters never bothered to even read the adverse reactions report. Nor did they ask a few simple questions such as "Who is funding the Institute of Medicine? And what is the agenda of the IoM?"

Today, NaturalNews publishes a stunning story about the IoM which reveals this government-created non-profit to be a key player in the military medical complex involving a shady network of weapons manufacturers, the Department of Homeland Security, top pharmaceutical companies and population control globalists such as Bill Gates. Here, we expose who's giving the IoM money and why the actual sources of funding behind the IoM destroy any credibility it once claimed to have on the subject of public health.

We've already published the first honest assessment of the IoM's report in a news item posted yesterday:
http://www.naturalnews.com/033447_Institute_...

That story takes an honest investigative look at the IoM and what its report really says. The old "dinosaur" media, as usual, has predictably twisted this story around and falsely claimed that it gives vaccines a clean bill of health. Only NaturalNews (and other alternative media organizations) dares tell the truth while questioning the IoM's financial ties and funding sources. The entire mainstream media blindly accepts the IoM's "authority" as beyond reproach, neglecting to conduct basic journalism and follow the money as NaturalNews is doing.

By the way, you can view the IoM's full report for yourself at:
http://naturalnews.com/files/Adverse-Effects...

[h=1]Why does the truth about the Institute of Medicine really matter?[/h]Because the IoM is positioned by the federal government as an independent, "prestigious" organization whose decisions are based on scientific facts. When the U.S. government rolls out its upcoming mandatory vaccination requirements, it will cite the Institute of Medicine as the source that said vaccines were safe (even though that's a lie).

The FDA, for example, cites the Institute of Medicine is setting its own vaccine policies (http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Sa...). The USDA also turns to the IoM for its recommendations on things like school lunch programs (http://www.fns.usda.gov/cga/pressreleases/20...).

Even more to the point, President Obama's recent demand that health insurance companies pay for birth control medication was based on the Institute of Medicine's recommendation (http://www.lifenews.com/2011/08/01/obama-adm...). It was the IoM that put forth the guidelines to "require new health insurance plans to cover women’s preventive services" including "FDA-approved contraception methods and contraceptive counseling."

Even the CDC commissioned the IoM to study the control of viral hepatitis infections, after which the CDC quickly advised that all infants should be injected with multiple hepatitis vaccines "...as soon as they are stable and washed." In this same set of recommendations, the IoM advised that students who are not vaccinated against hepatitis B should not be allowed to attend school. (http://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/IOMnews.htm)

The IoM, in other words, is the go-to organization for the setting of government health policy. Never mind the fact that the IoM is two-thirds funded by government itself and also takes money from the world's top vaccine manufacturers. The conflicts of interest within the IoM are not merely notable, but severe conflicts of interest. They are so prominent, in fact, that no person in their right mind should believe a word the IoM says about vaccines, yet both the government and the mainstream media is positioning the IoM as (somehow) being a trustworthy independent non-profit that tells the truth about vaccines.

Even the Washington Legal Foundation (http://www.wlf.org), a group that advocates free choice in health care (and personal freedom in general), charged that the FDA could not legally accept recommendations from the Institute of Medicine because the committee members put forth by the IoM did not meet the lawful requirement of being "fairly balanced."

"Using advice from a committee that lacks fair balance encroaches upon Congress' mandate that each Advisory Committee should be representative of a broad range of viewpoints and should include affected individuals," said WLF Chief Counsel Richard Samp after filing WLF's Citizen Petition. (http://www.policymed.com/2011/07/institute-o...)

This is where the danger really lies. Everybody else in government listens to the IoM and usually adopts its recommendations as public health policy. And yet the IoM is actually run and financed by a complex network of globalists and vaccine promoters, as you'll see below.

Because of the IoM's unchallenged influence in setting public health policy, we are all being set up for a military-run mass vaccination campaign funded in part by the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, and relying on vaccine-tracking information technology from companies like Northrup Grumman, a weapons manufacturer with a history of illegal international arms trafficking. (More details below.)

This is what vaccines have become in America today: A military agenda against the People. And the IoM sits at the hub of influence for this diabolical command center. This is all explained in more detail in the rest of this story, as well as in upcoming stories about the IoM slated for publication here on NaturalNews.

Please share this story far and wide so that your friends and colleagues can learn the truth about the IoM and where its money really comes from.

I wish to thank the NaturalNews Facebook fans who conducted much of this research to help us find the truth behind the Institute of Medicine (www.Facebook.com/HealthRanger)

[h=1]The IoM's secret ties to the military and weapons manufacturers[/h]The Institute of Medicine was created by Congress in 1970. On its website, the IoM claims "we do not receive direct federal funding for our work," which as you will soon see is a highly misleading statement, given that 64.9% of the IoM's funds actually come from the federal government.

NaturalNews learned that the IoM is funded by the Who's Who of the most evil corporations, non-profits and government organizations involved in things like secret medical experiments on humans, global population control agendas, the spread of degenerative disease, international arms trafficking and crimes against humanity (see list below).

The IoM is also blatantly deceptive about where its funding comes from. While its website claims it does not receive federal funding for its work, an investigation by Senator Coburn's office reveals that 55% of the IOM's funding comes from the government (http://coburn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/ri...). This number varies year to year, of course, and we've found documentation showing this number to be as high as 64.9%.

It all begs the question: Why would the IoM try to hide the fact that it receives so much money from the federal government? We'll get more into that later, but first, check out some of the government organizations from which the IoM receives its money:

[h=1]Government departments that fund the IoM[/h]• Department of Homeland Security
• Department of Defense
• Department of Health and Human Services
• EPA (in charge of allowing corporate pollution of our nation)
• USDA (the pro-Monsanto, pro-GMO sellout)
• Social Security Administration

In all, two-thirds of the IoMs money comes from government sources, several of which are military and "homeland security" related. What this reveals is that various government agencies function as "shell companies" to funnel money into the IoM. More than five percent of the IoM's funding comes from the Department of Defense, and a further 3.6% comes from the Department of Homeland Security.

It makes you wonder: What does WAR have to do with medicine? Well, everything, as you'll soon see. In 2008, the Department of Homeland Security requested that the IoM conduct a workshop entitled, "Medical Preparedness for a Nuclear Detonation in a Major U.S. City". (http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2009/NucEventPrep...) The workshop "assessed the ability of emergency services, healthcare, and federal, state, and local authorities to respond to a nuclear weapon equivalent to 10 kilotons of TNT detonated during a workday in a central business district of a large U.S. metropolitan area."

The IoM even managed to twist the terror attacks of 9/11 into its own pro-vaccine agenda, issuing a strongly worded press release on November 5, 2011 which declared, "[America's] capacity to develop, produce, and store vaccines to deal with these agents is inadequate to meet the nation's needs." The IoM then recommended the creation of a "National Vaccine Authority" which would be used to spearhead the U.S. government getting into the vaccine manufacturing business in what the IoM calls a "the creation of a government-owned, contractor-operated national vaccine facility." (i.e. the federal government actually manufacturing vaccines, mandating their use, outlawing lawsuits against vaccines and imprisoning those who refuse to take them). (http://www.iom.edu/Global/News%20Announcemen...)

The IoM describes this "vaccine authority" as a group that "...could become a source of appropriate reliable information to the media health care personnel, policy-makers, and the public." (i.e. a vaccine propaganda Ministry of Truth.)

[h=1]Vaccinating all the children of the world[/h]Immediately following this recommendation, the IoM published a document called "The Children's Vaccine Initiative: Achieving the Vision" which it describes as "...an international endeavor to ensure that children throughout the world are immunized. One of the best opportunities to address the growing problem of immunization in the United States ...lies in marshaling the vaccine development and production efforts in the United States and abroad." (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=222...)

In addition to receiving funds from the DOD and DHS, the IoM also allows its key reports to be reviewed by weapons manufacturers before they are published. Its recent report on vaccine adverse reactions, for example, was reviewed by Sam Shekar from the military defense contractor Northrop Grumman, a weapons manufacturer and military technology engineering company that has been caught engaging in illegal international arms trafficking by the U.S. State Department. A subsidiary of Northrup Grumman "provided portions of the computer source code of Air Force One to a Russian company in 1998," reports Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Grumma...).

Northrup Grumman also illegally sold computer guidance systems to Angola, Indonesia, Israel, China, Ukraine and Yemen.

On the health front, Northrup Grumman was awarded a key role in a $5 billion grant from the CDC to run a "public health" information technology program. (http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/new...)

What's a public health information technology program? It is a cybersecurity technology system used to track people who have been vaccinated while monitoring the spread of infectious disease (which the IoM admits is caused by the vaccines themselves). Remember: Most people who are diagnosed with infectious disease are the very same people who were vaccinated against those diseases! (http://www.naturalnews.com/033399_vaccines_m...)

We suspect this technology will likely be used to track and enforce an upcoming militarized mandatory vaccine agenda in much the same way that IBM sold its technology to the Nazi regime in World War II to track Jewish prisoners as they were hauled off to concentration camps. (http://www.ibmandtheholocaust.com/home.php)

In this, we have a blurring of the lines between military and medicine. The theme that emerges from all this is that conventional medicine is being militarized, and the signs of that are all around us (see more, below). For example, the FDA has stepped up its armed raids on innocent dairy farmers, using "shock troop" tactics while borrowing techniques from the KGB to build a network of spies and infiltrators (http://www.naturalnews.com/033428_FDA_secret...).

That an international arms trafficker is now being given grant money by the CDC to engineer and run a "CDC global health mission" is a direct admission of the globalist agenda behind these criminal organizations. The Northrup Grumman press release on this admits that the contract work with the CDC will be conducted in "50 countries around the world" involving "20 business and university partners."

[h=1]Private sources of money for the Institute of Medicine[/h]While 64.9% of its funding comes from the federal government, 32.7% comes from private sources. See page 55 of the following report to see for yourself:
http://www.naturalnews.com/files/PresSupplem...

That funding chart does not break down private sources of money for the IoM, so once again, NaturalNews turned to its researchers on Facebook (www.Facebook.com/HealthRanger) to find out where all this money is actually coming from. The answers may surprise you.

For starters, the IoM receives funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation which is, of course, a total front for vaccines and Big Pharma. This alone completely biases the IoM, as having financial ties with this foundation is really like being caught with your hand in the vaccine cookie jar.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, for those who don't know, recently declared this to be the "decade of vaccines" (http://www.naturalnews.com/031703_Bill_Gates...) and pledged ten billion dollars to make sure that every man, woman and child on the planet is injected with at least one vaccine shot, and preferably several.

And what's the real agenda behind this? Bill Gates has publicly stated that vaccines will be used to reduce the global population. Specifically, he says, "The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent." (http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_B...)

Watch the video of Bill Gates saying this at:
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A155D11345...

By accepting money from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Institute of Medicine is taking part in a campaign of human genocide while exposing its own pro-vaccine interests.

Bill Gates is also listed as a "lifetime contributor" to the IoM, giving "$100,000 or more" to the IOM. Other contributors who gave big money to the IoM include Margaret Hamburg, the current head of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the same agency currently masterminding KGB-style infiltration schemes and running an illegal network of government spies to destroy the raw dairy industry (http://www.naturalnews.com/033428_FDA_secret...).

In addition, globalist Ted Turner is listed as a major contributor. See the rest of the names of those who give money to the IoM at the end of this article -- it's a who's who of globalists, financial elitists, pharma executives and vaccine pushers, including people with links to the Federal Reserve, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, the Rockefellers and more.

[h=1]Junk food promoters found funding the Institute of Medicine[/h]Beyond taking money from the genocidal Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the IoM is also funded at times from junk food and soda companies such as PepsiCo (http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2009/Mitigating-N...)

Even more interestingly, a prominent board member of PepsiCo is also a member of the Institute of Medicine: Victor J. Dzau, a conventional medical doctor, has made the rounds through Harvard Medical School and Duke University. Now he's a top PepsiCo board member while simultaneously serving as a director of these three pharmaceutical and medical device companies: Genzyme Corporation, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc. (http://www.pepsico.com/Company/Board-of-Dire...) and (http://people.forbes.com/profile/victor-j-dz...)

Ring any bells? Medtronic is the company that was recently caught bribing a doctor to fabricate study results (http://www.naturalnews.com/027745_Medtronic_...). The company was also caught up in allegations of Medicare fraud (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/23/business/2...) and was sued by 22 states, which said Medtronic "unlawfully and unabashedly developed, marketed and promoted its biliary stent medical devices for uses unapproved by the Food and Drug Administration." (http://www.kare11.com/news/news_article.aspx...)

Genzyme Corporation, on which Victor Dzau also sits as a board member, is a fully owned subsidiary of Sanofi-Aventis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genzyme), one of the world's largest vaccine manufacturers and the company that recently received hundreds of millions of dollars in government vaccine contracts for the hyped up H5N1 swine flu scare. Sanofi-Aventis admittedly received $192.5 million from the U.S. government just in the second quarter of 2008 to produce vaccines for a "pandemic stockpile" against H5N1 (http://en.sanofi.com/press/press_releases/20...).

Genzyme produces medicines to treat kidney disease, one of the most common side effects of flu vaccines. (http://www.naturalnews.com/030299_vaccinatio...) In this way, the more vaccines that are injected into people, the more kidney disease drugs can be sold by companies such as Genzyme.

And yet Genzyme has questionable health practices itself! In June, 2009, Genzyme's U.S. manufacturing plant was shut down due to the discovery that it suffered from a "viral contamination." In November of 2009, "fragments of stainless steel, rubber, and fiber-like material were discovered in some of Genzyme's drugs," after which the FDA said all those drugs should stay on the market because there was no evidence of any side effects from those materials. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genzyme#Contami...)

Not surprisingly, Victor Dzau was named a "Distinguished Scientist" by the American Heart Association and was the recipient of the 2004 Max Delbruck Medal, Berlin, Germany. Max Delbruck, by the way, was a German biophysicist who promoted the idea that living systems (including humans) are nothing more than biochemical robots, and his work on molecular genetics was, in many ways, ground-laying work for modern-day genetic engineering (GMOs).

Other board members of PepsiCo, in case you were curious, read like a who's who of the most powerful (and some say "evil") corporate giants in the world: JP Morgan, Colgate-Palmolive, Google, Novartis AG and more.

Beyond PepsiCo, the IoM also receives money from these producers of processed dead foods, fast foods and foods made with (collectively) hundreds of different synthetic chemicals and preservatives:

• Kraft Foods, Inc.
• Mars Incorporated
• McDonald's Corporation
• Mead Johnson Nutritionals

[h=1]The IoM's ties to Big Pharma[/h]In addition to its ties with junk food companies, the IoM receives millions of dollars in grant money from pharmaceutical companies, using that money to create new staff positions which claim to be "providing the nation with sound advice grounded in scientific evidence, to improve people’s health and well-being." For example, the IoM received this $2 million grant from a pharmaceutical company (Schaeffer): http://www.iom.edu/About-IOM/Support-IOM/Rec...

Schaeffer is a total pharma insider, according to Forbes Magazine, which lists him as the director of pharma giant Allergan, Inc: http://people.forbes.com/profile/leonard-d-s...

Allergan is most famous for producing BOTOX, a cosmetic treatment made from a deadly viral strain best known for killing people through food poisoning.

In addition, the IoM has financial ties to Merck, Pfizer, Astrazeneca and nearly all the top pharmaceutical companies, most of which also profit from producing and selling vaccines:

• AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P.
• Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
• Eli Lilly and Company
• GlaxoSmithKline
• Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC
• Merck & Company, Inc.
• Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
• Pfizer, Inc.
• Sanofi Pasteur
• Sanofi-aventis
• Wyeth

In addition to promoting pharmaceutical interests, the IoM has also pushed its agenda of regulating dietary supplements as if they were drugs, thereby hoping to outlaw virtually all supplements sold on the market today (http://www.anh-usa.org/u-s-institute-of-medi...).

[h=1]IoM's huge conflicts of interest with vaccine producers[/h]Notably, the pharmaceutical companies listed above represent the top vaccine producers on the planet, once again showing that the IoM has severe conflicts of interest in producing a report on vaccine adverse reactions.

This is like the fox guarding the hen house! If the IoM told the truth about the dangers of vaccines, it would risk losing a significant portion of its funding and discrediting many of its most prominent financial supporters. (It makes you wonder: Why didn't Forbes raise this question? Or the NY Times? Or Washington Post? Or any mainstream media organization? Why is real journalism dead in America today everywhere except in the alternative media like NaturalNews, which is fast becoming the most popular choice for discerning readers?)

In addition, vaccines cause the very health conditions which are profitably treated by the pharmaceutical products of these companies. Thus, today's entire medical racket of treating sickness and "managing disease" requires that disease to be propagated in the first place. Vaccines play a key role in causing immunological disorders, compromising the nervous system, damaging kidneys, promoting cancer and causing the very diseases that keep Big Pharma in business.

If you're skeptical of that, watch this stunning, jaw-dropping video admission of much of this from a top Merck scientist, the "father" of many modern vaccines, who openly admits that vaccines contain hidden cancer viruses:
http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=13EAAF22CDA367...

[h=1]The IoM's ties to foundations and globalist groups[/h]The IoM also receives funding from other institutions (such as NIH) which are funded by government -- and they largely operate as pharma front groups to push more vaccines, more pharmaceuticals and more medications for Americas; often while downplaying any role of nutrients such as vitamin D.

Here's a list of some of the non-profit groups that donate money to the IoM. Note the presence of all the corporatists and globalists:

• W. K. Kellogg Foundation (tied to the Kellogg's cereal company)
• The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
• The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
• Merck Company Foundation
• The Rowe Family Foundation
• Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Global Impact Funding Trust, Inc.
• The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
• The Whitehead Foundation (ties to Goldman Sachs, and John C. Whitehead was a former board member of the Federal Reserve. He also oversaw the Whitehead family's fortune of investments in the Rockefeller Group.)

[h=1]IoM's ties to globalist food and agriculture companies[/h]The food and agriculture companies that give money to the IoM represent some of the most evil corporations in the world, including Monsanto which seeks to dominate the world food supply through its GMO seed technologies.

Here are some of the food and agriculture companies that financially support the IoM:

• Cargill, Inc.- sold ground turkey widely contaminated with salmonella, which resulted in fatalities (http://www.naturalnews.com/033283_ground_tur...)

• ConAgra, Inc.- sued for falsely labeling GMO oils as "natural" (http://www.naturalnews.com/news_000223_ConAg...)

• General Mills, Inc. - engaged in deceptive food labeling (http://www.naturalnews.com/031053_General_Mi...)

• McDonald’s Corporation - sells Chicken McNuggets that contain an industrial chemical (http://www.naturalnews.com/032820_Chicken_Mc...)

• Monsanto Company - voted "most evil corporation" by NaturalNews readers (http://www.naturalnews.com/030967_Monsanto_e...)

• PepsiCo, Inc. - produces aspartame-laden diet soft drinks also made with high-fructose corn syrup. Uses MSG throughout many of its snacks.

As you can see, these companies aggregately support factory farmed animal meat production, dishonest and deceptive food labeling, "terminator" seed technology that destroys seeds and is contributing to the global spread of suicides by farmers, the promotion of obesity and diabetes through the use of high-fructose corn syrup, the neurotoxic poisoning of consumers through aspartame-sweetened beverages, monopolistic trade practices, abuses of the court system and much more.

If Hell had a board of directors, many of these corporations would have members sitting on it. And these are the members who financially support the Institute of Medicine.

Interestingly, the IoM also has financial ties to several health insurance companies who profit from sickness, disease and vaccines, including Aetna Inc. and Kaiser Permanente.

[h=1]The IoM's financial ties to the sickness and disease industry[/h]Not surprisingly, the IoM is funded by a large number of influential (and wealthy) organizations in the cancer industry, the diabetes industry, and the sickness industry in general.

Here are some of the national groups -- all of which profit from disease -- that funnel money to the Institute of Medicine:

• American Association for Cancer Research
• American Cancer Society, Inc.
• American Chemistry Council
• American Diabetes Association
• American Hospital Association
• American Medical Association
• American Nurses Association
• American Society of Clinical Oncology
• Association of American Medical Colleges
• College of American Pathologists
• Critical Path Institute
• Infectious Diseases Society of America
• National Association of Chain Drug Stores Foundation
• National Society of Genetic Counselors
• Oncology Nursing Society
• Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA)
• Task Force for Child Survival and Development

As you can probably tell, nearly all of these organizations are pro-chemical, pro-chemotherapy, pro-vaccine, anti-nutrition, anti-health freedom organizations that function as disease parasites on society, profiting from sickness rather than showing people how to be healthy. None of these organizations, for example, has yet to firmly promote vitamin D as a simple, low-cost, nearly-miraculous nutrient that can prevent cancer, diabetes, osteoporosis, depression, gum disease, kidney disorders and many other health conditions.

They are all steeped in the false mythology of western medicine and its drugs-pushing, profit-seeking agenda which includes the mass vaccination of the population.

[h=1]IoM is headed by pro-vaccine globalists with ties to WHO, CDC[/h]After learning who funds the IoM, you might still be wondering: Who runs the Institute of Medicine?

The IoM is currently headed by Dr. Harvey Fineberg, a globalist with ties to the World Health Organization, which of course heavily pushed its H5N1 swine flu vaccination charade through a "panel of experts" who were taking money from the pharmaceutical companies to declare a global pandemic when there wasn't one. The whole purpose of this conspiracy involving the WHO and the CDC was to sell more vaccines. (http://www.naturalnews.com/029481_vaccines_W...)

Dr. Fineberg also has ties to the CDC, the other group pushing vaccines and killing children through its incessant infectious disease mongering. The CDC's own vaccine research scientist, Poul Thorsen, has been indicted under federal law for alleged money laundering (http://www.naturalnews.com/032216_Thorsen_fr...). See the Web of Alleged Fraud involving the CDC, Merck, Thorsen and medical journals at: http://www.naturalnews.com/files/Web-of-Alle...

In 1988, Dr. Fineberg received the Joseph W. Mountin Prize from the CDC. Fineberg is, predictably, a Harvard graduate where he earned a conventional medical degree from Harvard Medical School plus a Ph.D. in government from a Harvard graduate school. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_V._Fineb...) Harvard is a source for many of the most despicable medical globalists who promote things like GMOs, vaccines and even chemotherapy for children.

Fineberg also served as the president of the Society for Medical Decision Making, a Big Pharma front group that promotes the use of vaccines and pharmaceuticals while claiming to follow a "scientific" decision process. This group receives money from the PhRMA Foundation, a total Big Pharma money funneling outfit that uses its grant money to influence the work of other organizations. It is funded by Merck, Eli Lilly, Bayer, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline and all the big pharmaceutical players.

Dr. Fineberg is a pro-vaccine globalist who even describes the 1976 swine flu vaccination fiasco which killed hundreds of Americans and damaged thousands from vaccine side effects a "qualified success" because it resulted in 40 million Americans being vaccinated. The way these vaccine pushers think, the more people get vaccinated, the better... no matter how many people die in the process. They literally do not seem to mind sacrificing the lives of innocent people as long as more vaccines can be injected into the masses.

To this day, the IoM still will not openly admit that the 1976 swine flu vaccines killed anyone at all. In fact, the IoM was instrumental in laying out the false fairy tale that swine flu vaccines were never responsible for Guillain-Barre syndrome. As the totally discredited government website Flu.Gov explains:

"The Institute of Medicine (IOM) conducted a thorough scientific review in 2003 and concluded that people who received the 1976 swine influenza vaccine had a slight increased risk for developing GBS. Scientists have multiple theories on why this increased risk may have occurred, but the exact reason for this association remains unknown." (http://answers.flu.gov/questions/4204)

In other words, they swept it under the rug and now pretend such a link doesn't exist.

[h=1]A total Big Pharma cesspool of money, influence and quackery[/h]Essentially, what we're looking at here with Institute of Medicine, its director, its funding sources and its laughably unscientific conclusions is an orgy of Big Pharma money and influence peddling masquerading as scientifically-grounded public health.

When the IoM recently issued its report on vaccine adverse effects, what it was essentially doing was running interference for all its financial supporters which are, of course dominated by vaccine manufacturers and dubious government organizations such as the Dept. of Health and Human Services which oversees the criminal U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

The point of all this is to spread the fabricated story that "vaccines are essentially safe" and thus there is no harm in mandating that the entire population be injected with them.

That's what's coming soon, you see: A mandatory vaccination policy which will no doubt cite this IoM report as being a "credible" and "scientific" review of all the evidence concerning vaccines. Such a claim would be, of course, completely laughable if it weren't dealing with life and death issues.

Countless children are killed every year by vaccines, and many more become autistic after their nervous systems collapse in the hours or days following vaccine injections. And yet what's clear from all the attacks, the lies, the cover-ups and the total criminal corruption from the medical industry that we've seen over the past couple of years is that the medical military establishment is desperately trying to destroy or dismiss all the evidence linking vaccines to autism.

This IoM report is essentially the work of vaccine industry cover-up con artists and quacks who are protecting their financial sponsors: the vaccine manufacturers.

Is anyone really surprised?

[h=1]List of other big-money contributors to the IOM[/h]Who else supports the Institute of Medicine? Here are some of the biggest individual contributors. NaturalNews has not yet had the time to research the backgrounds and globalist ties of these individuals. If you recognize any of these names as being involved in the vaccine industry, the banking industry or the military industrial complex, please let us know so we can update this article:

John Abelson
Bruce and Betty Alberts
Rose-Marie and Jack R. Anderson
John and Lise Armstrong
Richard C. and Rita Atkinson
Norman R. Augustine
Francisco J. and Hana Ayala
William F. Ballhaus, Sr.
Craig and Barbara Barrett
Jordan and Rhoda Baruch
Warren L. Batts
Stephen D. Bechtel, Jr.
Kenneth E. Behring
C. Gordon Bell
Elwyn and Jennifer Berlekamp
Diane and Norman Bernstein
Mrs. Elkan R. Blout
Harry E. Bovay, Jr.
David G. Bradley
Donald L. Bren
Sydney Brenner
Fletcher and Peg Byrom
Russell L. Carson
Ralph J. and Carol M. Cicerone
A. James Clark
James McConnell Clark
Dale and Jeanne Compton
Roman W. DeSanctisa
Robert and Florence Deutsch
George and Maggie Eads
Robert and Cornelia Eaton
Richard Evans
Harvey V. Fineberga and Mary E. Wilson
Tobie and Dan Fink
George and Ann Fisher
Harold K. and Betty A. Forsen
William L. and Mary Kay Friend
Eugene Garfield
William H. Gates, III
T. H. Geballe
Penny and Bill George
Nan and Chuck Geschke
Bernard M. Gordon
Barbara N. Grossman
Corbin Gwaltney
Margaret A. Hamburg and Peter F. Brown
William M. Haney, III
Michael and Sheila Held
Jane Hirsh
M. Blakeman Ingle
Joan and Irwin Mark Jacobs
Robert L. and Anne K. James
Anita K. Jones
Thomas V. Jones
Trevor O. Jones
Kenneth A. Jonsson
Yuet Wai and Alvera Kan
Fred Kavli
Cindy and Jeong Kim
Olga Kirchmayer
Frederick A. Klingenstein
William I. Koch
Jill H. Kramer
John W. Landis
William W. Lang
Geralda and Doris Laubach
Whitney and Betty MacMillan
William W. McGuirea
Burton and DeeDee McMurtry
Richard and Ronay Menschel
Dane and Mary Louise Miller
Mrs. G. William Miller
George and Cynthia Mitchell
Gordon and Betty Moore
Joe and Glenna Moore
David and Lindsay Morgenthaler
Richard M. Morrow
Philipa and Sima Needleman
Gerda K. Nelson
Ralph S. O’Connor
Peter O’Donnell, Jr.
Kenneth H. Olsen
Doris Pankow
Lawrence and Carol Papay
Jack S. Parker
Shela and Kumar Patel
Percy Pollard
Robert A. Pritzker
Dr. and Mrs. Allen E. Puckett
Ann and Michael Ramage
Simon Ramo
Carol and David Richards
Anne and Walt Robb
Henry M. Rowan
George Rowe, Jr.
Jack W.a and Valerie Rowe
Mrs. Joseph E. Rowe
William J. Rutter
Stephena and Anne Ryan
Jillian Sackler
Raymond and Beverly Sackler
Henry and Susan Samueli
Bernard G. and Rhoda Sarnat
Leonard D. Schaeffera
Wendy and Eric Schmidt
Sara Lee and Axel Schupf
Shep and Carol Ruth Shepherd
Melvin I. Simon
Georges C. St. Laurent, Jr.
Charlotte and Morry Tanenbaum
Ted Turner
Leslie L. Vadasz
Roya and Diana Vagelos
Charles M. and Rebecca M. Vest
John C. Whitehead
Wm. A. Wulf
Alejandro Zaffaronia
Janet Zucker and Jerry Zucker

[h=1]Share this story[/h]We need your help to spread the word about vaccines, drug makers and the outrageous conflicts of interest at the Institute of Medicine.

Please share this story on social networks and websites. Forward it to your friends or even post it on your website (with proper credit and a link back to NaturalNews, please).

NaturalNews is, to my knowledge, the only news organization in the world that has taken the time to really dig into the financial ties of the Institute of Medicine. All the other mainstream media presstitutes have long ago surrendered to a globalist agenda and no longer practice anything resembling journalism. They merely regurgitate corporate lies, then call it "medical news."

But here at NaturalNews, we believe that the role of journalism in a free society is to ask the tough questions... to be a little pushy and look for the real story behind the P.R. announcements. It is sad that only the alternative media (which is quickly becoming the dominant media now) dares cover the truth about this story, but that's exactly why we need your help in getting this story more widely read by others.

This story can't be completely told, by the way, without mentioning the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, an elaborate scheme set up by the U.S. government to insulate pharmaceutical companies from lawsuits that should have been filed by all the parents of children damaged by vaccines. Think about this: Vaccines are so dangerous that the U.S. government had to set up an extra-constitutional court system just to make sure the American people can't seek justice against Big Pharma!

The vaccine industry is run by such a powerful cabal of medical criminals that even the U.S. Supreme Court says it has no jurisdiction whatsoever when it comes to the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. In other words, this kangaroo court is more powerful than the U.S. Supreme Court! And its sole purpose, of course, is to make sure vaccine companies can never be sued, even as their products cause widespread fatalities and neurological harm in children, including autism. (http://www.naturalnews.com/031484_Supreme_Co...)

[h=1]Check NaturalNews and InfoWars.com for more details[/h]There's more to come in all this, too: NaturalNews is currently researching the military ties behind HHS and the medical industry, and we plan to publish a truly eye-opening article very soon that shows why the FDA (among other government agencies) is becoming militarized and conducting so many armed raids against innocents.

Watch for that news here on NaturalNews.com. In addition, you may see me appearing on the Alex Jones Show (www.PrisonPlanet.tv) this coming week as InfoWars covers this issue as well. (www.InfoWars.com)

Also check out coverage of this topic at www.NaturalNewsRadio.com where Robert Scott Bell is covering this issue with his fantastic daily radio show.

Thank you for your support and your interest in this topic.

[h=1]Research documents cited in this article include[/h]The President's Report Supplement - an overview of the IoM's finances (2010)
http://www.naturalnews.com/files/PresSupplem...

The Institute of Medicine's report on Vaccine Adverse Reactions (2011)
http://naturalnews.com/files/Adverse-Effects...

You may notice that this document is 666 pages in length. It actually downloads as 667 pages, but the last page is blank, making it 666. Page 666, by the way, features the minutes from a presentation made by the Keck Center of the National Academies which offers talks with such titles as "The Immune Response to Vaccines and Natural Infection" and "Antibodies, Vaccines, Neuroinflammation, and the Blood-Brain Barrier".

​

​

 

[muir]

http://www.naturalnews.com/049961_vaccine_injury_media_coverage_real_journalism.html

[h=1]UK media suddenly covering all the vaccine injury stories the U.S. pharma-corrupted media pretends never happened[/h]

Thursday, June 04, 2015
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

The censorship Berlin Wall on vaccine injuries is starting to crumble... in the UK, at least, where mainstream media outlets there are suddenly covering the thousands of young girls and boys who are routinely damaged by toxic vaccines.

The pharma-controlled, vaccine-worshipping U.S. mainstream media, of course, hilariously pretends vaccines cause no damage to anyone. That's part of the reason why no one believes the mainstream media anymore, which explains why mainstream media readership is plummeting while New Media readership is exploding. (Our new GoodGopher.com search engine for the New Media has already received over 4,500 new site submits from webmasters.)

Junk science media outlets like the Washington Post -- now entirely controlled by Monsanto -- attack vaccine skeptics as anti-science people for pointing out that children are being maimed and sometimes killed by vaccines. See Hundreds of children brain damaged by the swine flu vaccine to receive $90 million in financial compensation from UK government.

It makes me wonder: Will the junk science mainstream media in the United States now ridiculously condemn the UK mainstream media as "anti-science" for reporting on the thousands of children being neurologically damaged by vaccines? Does the lamestream media in the USA even remember what journalism is in the first place?

[h=1]Major media outlets across the UK now practicing actual journalism on the vaccine issue[/h]Check out what's happening in the UK press now all of a sudden. No doubt the vaccine industry is pushing hard to censor all these stories, so you might want to check them quickly while they still exist online: (h/t to Health Impact News for pointing these out)

EXPRESS.CO.UK: Tens of thousands of teen girls suffer serious illnesses after HPV cervical cancer jab

• "TENS of thousands of teenage girls have fallen seriously ill and even been left wheelchair-bound after taking the routine cervical cancer vaccination."

• "...the number is estimated to be only ten per cent of the true number of teens struck down with severe side effects after taking the vaccine."

• "In more than a quarter of the cases, the effects have apparently been so severe that they were considered 'life-threatening' and required immediate medical treatment."

The Independent: Thousands of teenage girls enduring debilitating illnesses after routine school cancer vaccination

• "Emily is one of the thousands of teenage girls who have endured debilitating illnesses following the routine immunisation. She is yet to recover and has no idea when her health will return to normal."

• "In the 10 years to April this year the agency received almost 22,000 'spontaneous suspected' adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports in 13 routine immunisation categories including flu, MMR, tetanus, diphtheria and polio, according to a Freedom of Information response released earlier this month."

• "PoTS and fibromyalgia are among the diseases he believes have developed after HPV vaccination, and that clinicians should be aware of the possible association between HPV vaccination and the development of these 'difficult to diagnose' painful syndromes."

The Daily Mail (UK): Tens of thousands of teenage girls believed to have fallen ill with debilitating illnesses after routine HPV cervical cancer jab

• "Side effects including chest and abdominal pains, exhaustion, breathing difficulties, fibromyalgia and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome."

• "Some have been left wheelchair-bound by apparent effects of vaccine."

• "Worried mothers have told how their previously healthy daughters have suffered fits, extreme tiredness and even been left wheelchair-bound after being vaccinated in their early teens. In some cases, the girls started to feel ill on the day they were vaccinated. Others became sick several weeks later."

[h=1]Even France is now covering the vaccine debate with a sense of logic[/h]Check out this story: Mainstream media vigorously debates vaccine safety -- in France. It explains:

In the US, Canada and the rest of the English-speaking world, questioning vaccine safety is a taboo subject, one the mainstream press fears to touch, let alone to debate. Not so in France...

"Should we have doubts about vaccines?" asked a popular radio program last month, marking European Immunization Week. The program, which ran on France Inter, a major public channel that is part of Radio France, introduced the subject by acknowledging the "doubts and concerns about the usefulness of vaccines" that have led the French to have "less and less confidence in vaccines." France Inter then held a no-holds-barred debate between a controversial proponent of increased vaccine use...

[Another] example comes from Le Figaro, France’s second largest daily. After the French press last month reported that two infants died and hundreds had been injured after receiving rotavirus vaccines, Figaro examined the various issues at play, including conflict of interest — government regulators have had pharmaceutical industry ties -- and the wisdom of having these vaccines recommended by public health authorities.

[h=1]Vaccine violence against children totally ignored by the pharma-controlled U.S. media[/h]All this vaccine violence being committed against children worldwide is purely imaginary, according to the U.S. mainstream media.

Anyone even citing such statistics is automatically labeled "anti-science" by pathetic vaccine pushers who profit from the continued medical mutilation of innocent children.

I've even heard the idea of vaccine damage being labeled a "conspiracy theory" by the pro-pharma media -- the same media that conducted a total nationwide news blackout on the public admission of a CDC whistleblower scientist who admitted that he took part in a CDC cover-up to hide links between vaccines and autism.

That's how loony the corporate-controlled media has become: They label you a "conspiracy theorist" if you practice good science and good medicine by observing biological reactions to a routine medical intervention. Meanwhile, what they report as "facts" are actually fairytale delusions... such as the idea that vaccines harm no one and can be safely given to children in essentially unlimited quantities.

The real anti-science kooks, it turns out, are the blindly obedient vaccine pushers! (They also happen to be extremely angry egomaniacs who reek of vile hatred for humanity... and of children specifically.)

[h=1]UK media has realized journalistic integrity requires the practicing of actual journalism[/h]While tens of thousands of injured young children is no laughing matter, it is rather hilarious that the U.S. mainstream media's obedience to the total quackery of "vaccine safety" is causing its own rapid loss of credibility, readership and revenues. That's why the value of old media publishers is rapidly collapsing while, at the same time, alternative media websites are exploding in popularity.

THANK YOU, lamestream media, for creating the journalism vacuum now being filled by independent media outlets like Natural News -- websites that never would have grown at all if you the media had been doing its job in the first place.

And what do we want to see with vaccines here in the New Media? We're not opposed to the theory of immunization, and we most certainly aren't opposed to good science (I'm the science lab director of the Natural News Forensic Food Lab, conducting PhD-level atomic spectrometry analysis and original research on heavy metals in foods). We merely want to see all toxic chemicals and heavy metals removed from vaccines and for government to respect parental rights in deciding what medical interventions are best for their own children. It doesn't sound like much of a demand, really. It's just a demand for protecting children and respecting fundamental civil rights.

I never thought I'd see the day that demanding we stop poisoning children with mercury in flu shots is called "anti-science." But here we are, and that just tells you how insane the monopoly-run, criminal-minded vaccine industry has become these days. No wonder the public craves truthful reporting on this subject!

BOTTOM LINE: Any media outlet that tells you vaccines are safe is knowingly committing journalistic malpractice and lying to your face. They are paid by Big Pharma to tell such lies, and they knowingly put children in harm's way for their own selfish profits. Even the ethically challenged vaccine pushers they roll out to push vaccines -- people like Paul Offit -- totally abandon ethics by failing to disclose their own financial ties to the vaccine industry when they're interviewed on TV.

[h=1]Don't get your news on the USA from mainstream media within the USA[/h]Here's an important takeaway point on all this: Never read the U.S. mainstream media for any purpose other than tabloid entertainment. Most mainstream outlets are totally clueless, compromised and corrupted. Although there are intelligent reporters who work inside the U.S. media, they are handcuffed by censorship and editorial directives that prevent them from reporting the truth on GMOs, vaccines and other important topics. (I know this because many of them have come to me asking for work and explaining the kind of Orwellian censorship under which they operate. You would not believe the number of formerly mainstream media reporters who now work for Natural News... and the number is growing by the week right now as we keep expanding...)

If you want news about the USA from a mainstream source, start reading the Daily Mail (UK). Or check out Der Spiegel, Al Jazeera, RT, Sputnik News or The Intercept. You'll never get accurate news about the U.S. vaccine industry from the U.S. sellout media. They are just propaganda tools of the drug makers, and they're more than willing to see children harmed and even killed as long as they get their precious ad revenue from Big Pharma.

Yeah, it's sick.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/049961_vaccine_injury_media_coverage_real_journalism.html#ixzz3c5AAvig3
​

​

 

[muir]

http://www.naturalnews.com/049939_MMR_immunization_controversial_ingredients_vaccine_dangers.html#

[h=1]A look at the MMR vaccine ingredients[/h] Wednesday, June 03, 2015 by: Joel Edwards

The MMR vaccine contains three different live attenuated viruses- rubivirus (measles), parotitis (mumps), and rubeola (rubella or German measles).

There are many steps to manufacturing the MMR vaccine and a multitude of ingredients used in the manufacturing of the final product.

The MMR vaccine contains the following ingredients along with remnants of prior processing. Note the vaccine contains MSG, animal products, and the antibiotic neomycin. The MMR vaccine also contains human protein that has been genetically modified.

Ingredients: Sucrose, hydrolized gelatin, urea, sodium chloride, sorbitol, monosodium L-glutamate, sodium phosphate, human albumin sodium bicarbonate, potassium phosphate, potassium chloride, residual components of MRC-5 cells (including DNA and protein), neomycin, bovine serum albumin, other buffer and media ingredients, sodium phosphate dibasic, potassium phosphate monobasic, potassium phosphate dibasic.

[h=2]Some of the More Controversial Ingredients[/h][h=3]WI-38 human diploid cells[/h]WI-38 fibroblasts are derived from tissues of a fetus aborted in 1964.
[h=3]MRC-5 cells[/h]MRC-5 cells are cell lines that are commonly used in vaccines, but they are also used in other medical research. The cells are grown in culture, and then distributed widely. J.P. Jacobs originated this cell line in September of 1966. The cells were taken from the tissue of an aborted fetus.

[h=3]Recombinant Human Albumin[/h]The MMR vaccine contains genetically engineered human albumin, the most common protein found in blood. The FDA warns that all drugs containing human albumin could have the possibility of prion or viral disease contamination.

[h=3]Animal Ingredients[/h]The MMR vaccine includes ingredients derived from poultry and cows. The measles and mumps viruses are cultivated in cultures of chick embryonic cells while the growth medium for all three viruses contains fetal bovine serum.

[h=2]Moral Objections[/h]Many churches are outspoken critics regarding the use of tissue used from abortions for vaccines or for any other product. There are many different religious objections to vaccines; the following are statements from three well-known Christian denominations.

[h=3]Catholic Church View[/h]The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has issued the following statement about vaccines derived from aborted fetal tissue culture lines.

"Should a government agency or private company use tissue from induced abortions for vaccine development or other research? The Catholic bishops have answered in the negative. Such use tends to legitimize abortion as a source of "life-affirming" treatments, and requires collaboration with the abortion industry, which should be avoided. This judgment is reflected in policies governing Catholic health care."
​

[h=3]Orthodox Church View[/h]The Eastern Orthodox position is one opposed to abortion and any products that involve abortion. This includes using aborted fetal cell lines in vaccines.

[h=3]A Baptist Pastor's View - Utilizing Tissue from Aborted Fetuses[/h]To get a broader Christian perspective, Pastor Scott Miller of the Summit Baptist Church was asked about Baptist views on fetal cell lines in vaccines. He gave the following statement:

"The statement I have written below does not represent the view of an entire denomination. Baptist churches are autonomous. I share this as a follower of Christ. God's Word prioritizes life from the very beginning – in the mother's womb. In Psalm 139:13-16, David celebrates life before birth, and we should join our God in respecting and protecting every human being from conception to the grave. Tissue from an aborted, pre-born child should not be utilized in any vaccine. Such medical steps could rationalize or even promote and mobilize the abortion industry. Think of the paradox – should a preborn baby be destroyed in order to enhance the life of a living person? Let's pursue both and a solution. Let's protect preborn children and continue to search for God-honoring, appropriate life-enhancing vaccines."
​

For more research on vaccines, be sure to check out the first two sources below and see this overview of the MMR vaccine, and check out how to detox from vaccines.

Sources:

http://www.organiclifestylemagazine.com

http://www.organiclifestylemagazine.com

http://vaccines.procon.org

http://www.cdc.gov

http://cellculturedish.com

http://www.usccb.org

http://truthwiki.org/Vaccine_Fanaticism

About the author:
Joel learned long ago that pharmaceuticals were not the answer to health and vitality. He gave up on Pharmaceuticals many years ago, and he also gave up wheat and refined sugars. His hobbies include gluten free baking, gardening, and fitness. Joel is passionate about agriculture and environmental issues. Joel believes that progressive, cutting-edge, organic agriculture can feed the world.

​

​

 

[Lerxst]

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N0YQ0W820150604?irpc=932


[h=2]Merck accused of stonewalling in mumps vaccine antitrust lawsuit[/h][h=3]Thu Jun 4, 2015 10:06am EDT[/h]
By Brendan Pierson
(Reuters) - Two former Merck & Co Inc scientists accusing the drugmaker of falsifying tests of its exclusive mumps vaccine said in a court filing on Monday that Merck is refusing to respond to questions about the efficacy of the vaccine.
Attorneys at Constantine Cannon, who represent the scientists, asked U.S. Magistrate Judge Lynne Sitarski of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to compel Merck to respond to their discovery request, which asks the company to give the efficacy of the vaccine as a percentage.
Instead of answering the question, the letter said, Merck has been consistently evasive, using "cut-and-paste" answers saying it cannot run a new clinical trial to determine the current efficacy, and providing only data from 50 years ago.
"Merck should not be permitted to raise as one of its principal defenses that its vaccine has a high efficacy, which is accurately represented on the product's label, but then refuse to answer what it claims that efficacy actually is," the letter said.
A representative of Merck could not immediately be reached for comment.
The two scientists, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, filed their whistleblower lawsuit in 2010 claiming Merck, the only company licensed by the Food and Drug Administration to sell a mumps vaccine in the United States, skewed tests of the vaccine by adding animal antibodies to blood samples.
As a result, they said, Merck was able to produce test results showing that the vaccine was 95 percent effective, even though more accurate tests would have shown a lower success rate. The plaintiffs said these false results kept competitors from trying to produce their own mumps vaccines, since they were unable to match the effectiveness Merck claimed.
In 2012, Alabama-based Chatom Primary Care and two individual doctors, all purchasers of the vaccine, filed a proposed antitrust class action based on the allegations in the whistleblower suit. The two suits are now being coordinated before U.S. District Judge C. Darnell Jones and Magistrate Judge Sitarski.
The case is United States ex rel Krahling et al v. Merck & Co Inc, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 10-4374.
For whistleblowers: Gordon Schnell of Constantine Cannon
For Merck: Lisa Dykstra of Morgan Lewis & Bockius

 

[muir]

http://vaccinefactcheck.org/2015/06/05/europe-turning-against-vaccines/

[h=1]Europe turning against vaccines[/h] June 5, 2015 by Lawrence Solomon 1 Comment
“Europeans are turning away from vaccines, amid rising distrust of immunization for infectious diseases,” begins an article earlier this year in EurActiv, the journal of record for the European Community, published in over a dozen languages and widely read by journalists as a go-to-source for emerging policy debates in Europe.
As evidence for its claim, the article cites the French National Institute for Prevention and Health Education, which found that “distrust of vaccination has risen from 10% in 2005 to 40% in 2010,” as well as pointing to a major conference held in Italy last year, The State of Health of Vaccination in the EU. The conference, designed to counter the growing opposition among Europeans to vaccinations, featured numerous speakers concerned about the low levels of vaccination throughout the continent. As a Swedish presenter at the conference remarked about the failure of the public to embrace the MMR vaccine to protect against measles, “Among children aged 1-4 years, the age group targeted by routine childhood vaccination programs, 77% of cases were unvaccinated.”
In contrast to the English-speaking world, where increasing numbers of vaccines are being made mandatory and public debate is effectively banned, the trend is the opposite in Continental Europe. Last September, the French High Council for Public Health itself called for a public debate on whether vaccination against certain diseases should remain compulsory.
“In Europe, France is the only country to maintain the policy of compulsory vaccination against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis,” EurActiv reports.
“Portugal has kept compulsory vaccination for diphtheria and polio, and Belgium just for polio. Elsewhere in Europe, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Spain and others have all abolished compulsory vaccination.”
The article, entitled “Distrust of vaccinations on the rise across EU,” also represents the perspective of public health authorities, quoting them as extensively as their critics, including laments such as “Some whistle-blowers are very dangerous […] because they cause people to lose their trust [in vaccines].”
Our rating
Kudos to EurActiv, for balanced coverage of the vaccine issue. From an English-language journalist’s perspective, the kudos are especially well deserved because EurActiv caters to the European political establishment, and because it numbers pharmaceutical giants such as Sanofi among its prominent sponsors. This fair and balanced article is available here.

• 
  
• Email
• Print
• More

 

[Free Mind]

I'm gonna be honest and say I haven't read most of what has been posted here, but my main question is; What is the message you're trying to put across, the core meaning of this thread?

 

[muir]

I'm gonna be honest and say I haven't read most of what has been posted here, but my main question is; What is the message you're trying to put across, the core meaning of this thread?

is that directed at me or the OP?

 

[Free Mind]

is that directed at me or the OP?

You, sorry. ^^

 

[muir]

You, sorry. ^^

Here is the OP:

How do you guys feel about vaccines?

I'm on the fence. The health professional side of me knows the importance, especially about the spread of disease and working with vulnerable populations. I remember when I worked at a hospital a few years ago, I was required to get all my vaccines updated, and always receive the flu shot. I didn't mind, as I didn't want to harm any patients who were already vulnerable...but they're now talking about making vaccines mandatory for everyone.

I was listening to a radio program this morning (http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/ ) and they were saying how they want to make schools and programs only open to children who have update vaccines. Should everyone have to be vaccinated? Isn't legislating it mandatory creating a slippery slope?

I'm curious to know what you guys think!

Ok so i've highlighted the key parts there

I'm providing articles containing INFORMATION about vaccines that reflect how i think and feel about vaccines and about mandatory vaccination

And what a sucessful thread its been...nearly 26,000 hits to date!

You should be very happy to see your beloved forum getting so much traffic

 

[Free Mind]

I'm providing articles containing INFORMATION about vaccines that reflect how i think and feel about vaccines and about mandatory vaccination

And what a successful thread its been...nearly 26,000 hits to date!

You should be very happy to see your beloved forum getting so much traffic

Can you sum up your personal opinion on this based on all of the articles you've posted? Especially the mandatory vaccinations. Too much information for me to be reading all this, I'll be here for hours and hours. o.o

 

[muir]

Can you sum up your personal opinion on this based on all of the articles you've posted? Especially the mandatory vaccinations. Too much information for me to be reading all this, I'll be here for hours and hours. o.o

Sure...

if you go onto wikipedia and have a look at something called the 'council on foreign relations'

This is a think tank

have a look at the membership and note certain key names like bill gates, david rockefeller and so on

Then have a look at its sister organisation in the UK called 'chatham house' which like the CFR is part of a 'round table group' which was publically discussed by the US historian Carroll Quigley in his book 'tragedy and hope' (he lectured bill clinton at university)

if you go to the wiki page for cecil rhodes you can read how he left his fortune in his will to be used for the creation of the round table group or what quigley calls the 'milner group' after one of its key members

Rhodes made his fortune as an agent of the rothschilds who bankrolled his de beers diamond company

You can fact check all this very easily

Then look into a group called the 'club of rome' who are an offshoot of the CFR. This group published a paper called 'the limits to growth' calling for the curbing of the global population

The people in these various groups are also tied to big pharmaceutical companies and planned parenthood

They manufacture the vaccines. Bill Gates then pushes those vaccines onto the global population

The aim of the CFR is as revealed by various people through history including senator larry mcdonald (before his plane was shot down) is to create a one world government run by globalist bankers

Ex CFR chairman and banker David Rockefeller has publically admitted this in his memoirs

Their vision of a new world order involves drastically reducing the worlds population

The harm being caused by the vaccines is now well documented and some say that this is a deliberate market strategy of big pharma (the big corporations who make synthetic drugs including vaccines) to cause chronic health problems within the population to ensure that the public will then become lifelong customers of big pharma who then provide more drugs to treat the problems that their vaccines have caused

I would however go one further and say that it is not just about profits for big pharma (although they do make billions form all this) but it is actually about compromising the immune system of humans all over the planet as a way to drive down population numbers through stealth

In other words it is a giant eugenics programme being waged against humanity

This is however part of a war being fought on many fronts which some people are calling a 'full spectrum attack on humanity'

This involves also a destruction of the economic wealth of the people, of their envrionment, of their health, of their democratic rights and freedoms and of their privacy etc

 

[Free Mind]

Sure...

if you go onto wikipedia and have a look at something called the 'council on foreign relations'

This is a think tank

have a look at the membership and note certain key names like bill gates, david rockefeller and so on

Then have a look at its sister organisation in the UK called 'chatham house' which like the CFR is part of a 'round table group' which was publically discussed by the US historian Carroll Quigley in his book 'tragedy and hope' (he lectured bill clinton at university)

if you go to the wiki page for cecil rhodes you can read how he left his fortune in his will to be used for the creation of the round table group or what quigley calls the 'milner group' after one of its key members

Rhodes made his fortune as an agent of the rothschilds who bankrolled his de beers diamond company

You can fact check all this very easily

Then look into a group called the 'club of rome' who are an offshoot of the CFR. This group published a paper called 'the limits to growth' calling for the curbing of the global population

The people in these various groups are also tied to big pharmaceutical companies and planned parenthood

They manufacture the vaccines. Bill Gates then pushes those vaccines onto the global population

The aim of the CFR is as revealed by various people through history including senator larry mcdonald (before his plane was shot down) is to create a one world government run by globalist bankers

Ex CFR chairman and banker David Rockefeller has publically admitted this in his memoirs

Their vision of a new world order involves drastically reducing the worlds population

The harm being caused by the vaccines is now well documented and some say that this is a deliberate market strategy of big pharma (the big corporations who make synthetic drugs including vaccines) to cause chronic health problems within the population to ensure that the public will then become lifelong customers of big pharma who then provide more drugs to treat the problems that their vaccines have caused

I would however go one further and say that it is not just about profits for big pharma (although they do make billions form all this) but it is actually about compromising the immune system of humans all over the planet as a way to drive down population numbers through stealth

In other words it is a giant eugenics programme being waged against humanity

This is however part of a war being fought on many fronts which some people are calling a 'full spectrum attack on humanity'

This involves also a destruction of the economic wealth of the people, of their envrionment, of their health, of their democratic rights and freedoms and of their privacy etc

So their goal is to create a one world Government run by Globalist bankers. And one of their ways of achieving this is through vaccinations to affect our health and also a great profiteering business. (I'm sure there are many many other things the 'elite' are doing to bring about this demented goal.)

But...Lets say they succeeded in achieving this goal, what would they do after that? What was the point of it all?

 

[muir]

So their goal is to create a one world Government run by Globalist bankers. And one of their ways of achieving this is through vaccinations to affect our health and also a great profiteering business. (I'm sure there are many many other things the 'elite' are doing to bring about this demented goal.)

But...Lets say they succeeded in achieving this goal, what would they do after that? What was the point of it all?

Well the way i see it is that there are certain opposing forces

I mean...look no further than MBTI! for example look at the thinking and feeling functions and how they often clash on this forum

So the main duality shaping our world as i see it is a battle between centralised power and de-centralised power

All the various ideologies eg capitalism (state and free market), socialism, communism, fascism etc etc all tie into this basic struggle

Fundamentally it comes down to the fact that some people believe that they should rule over the rest of us with total power whilst many of the rest of us believe we should have a say in the decision making process and/or that everyone should have a say

We have what is being called 'democracy' at the moment but really we don't have much say do we? We elect a party each 5 years (which are invariably funded and controlled by the corporations) and then that party does whatever the hell it likes with our taxpayer money

So....it's not really democracy is it?

the swiss have regular referendums on many issues and therefore they have more say over what happens in their country...they have more democratic say

So it appears that at the moment we are living in a time where the most common system is one where the majority of people don't have much say and instead hand over all power to corrupt politicians every 5 years who then carry out the wishes of their corporate paymasters

Debating on an MBTI forum for a number of years has allowed me to test a pet theory that MBTI types might have a tendency towards either central control or decentralised power

I had a theory that some personality types might prefer a dictatorial system whereas some types might like a more inclusive system where everyone had power and a say in matters

And....i have observed patterns!!!!

ENTJ's tend to prefer systems of central control (because they want to be at the top of them controlling everyone) whereas INFJ's tend to believe that everyone should have a right to be heard

INTJ's also seem to tend to either outright support central control systems or passively accept them (by adopting a defeatist, pessimistic, cynical attitude)

INFJ's on the other hand tend to have a vision of the world that they would like to live in and to believe that if enough people share that vision that world can be achieved

of course this requires people to let go of cynicism and to realise that the only thing holding them back from a better world is their unwillingness to let go of their cynicism/pessimism

So.....the groupm of globalists who are often referred to by many names one of which is the 'illuminati' are basically believers in centrally controlled systems

They believe that they are best qualified to rule with total power over the rest of us

many of us however have observed history and realised that wherever we see central control we see exploitation and oppression

I'll talk a bit more about the illuminati in my next post but i don't want to swamp this post

 

[muir]

Sorry...got distracted there replying on another thread!

The illuminati....

I'm sure everyone is aware of how the bavarian illuminati under adam weishaupt (trained by the jesuits) was outlawed by the bavarian authorities when some of their plans fell into the hands of the government when a dispatch rider was...so the story goes...struck by lightening!

The paperwork outlined a plot to overthrow the monarchies of europe including france which then became the french revolution

The outlawed group then went underground into book reading clubs and into continental freemasonry from where it spread

letters exist (you can view them online) of the first president of the US george washington (a freemason) speaking to a friend about the illuminati

So...hopefully for anyone reading we have established that the illuminati are a historical fact

It is believed by some that the skull and bones society of yale is illuminati lodge no322

The symbol most associated with them is the pyramid with the all seeing eye

This symbolically represents a penis

In esoteric terms they believe that the sun is the tip of the macrocosmic mans penis

The illuminati are then the male, solar, phallic current

They represent the left hemisphere of the brain which is the intellect. It is focussed on measuring things and categorising things

When intellect is unbalanced by not being balanced out with the right hemisphere of the brain (responsible for feelings of oneness and connectivity) it is called 'lucifer' (false intellect).

Those that promote and elevate unbalanced intellect then are 'luciferians'

They use a torch or light as their symbol for this eg the freemason made statue of liberty (semiramis) or the statue of prometheus outside the rockefeller building in new york (prometheus is stealing the fire of intellect from the gods)

The symbol of the female, lunar, yoni current is an upside down pyramid

if you overlay the pyramids you get a 6 pointed star known as the seal of solomon (the name solomon is a composite of 3 names for the power behind the sun or aspects of it: Sol-Om-On)

The two pyramids also represent other dualities such as spirit v's matter and central control v's decentralised control

So the pyramid representing matter and central control is then used by the cabal on the back of their dollar bill because money is what roots people in the material world and through controlling the money supply the cabal control everyone centrally

So...they are pushing everyone into the left hemisphere of the brain through a left brain education system and they are encouraging everyone to immerse themselves in materiality for example through their ideology of 'consumer-ism'

This throws people off balance and keeps them feeling divided, alienated and seperate which leaves them in a more vulnerable state and more easy to control

The goal of the illuminati is to create a centrally controlled, planned economy, world government run by their supreme coven/council of 13 (there are 13 steps on the pyramid of the great seal)

The two illuminati and luminari, solar and lunar currents are represented in tibet by the red cap and the yellow cap monks

6 pointed star in metatrons cube:

 

[Free Mind]

Any idea how long this has been going on, [MENTION=1871]muir[/MENTION]? And I guess the most important question here...How do we collectively tackle this?

Sorry if I'm de-railing this thread, but it's kinda all connected. Can talk via PM if you prefer.

 

[muir]

Any idea how long this has been going on, @muir ? And I guess the most important question here...How do we collectively tackle this?

Sorry if I'm de-railing this thread, but it's kinda all connected. Can talk via PM if you prefer.

well the problem with discussing here is that this stuff is going down the rabbit hole a bit deeper than some peoples consciousness is ready to go so then there is a risk that things said about vaccines become associated with things that might seem less credible for some at this time

I don't mind saying what i've said above here because people can look into a lot of that stuff easily enough and check it out for themselves for example the club of rome, david rockefeller speaking about population control, the CFR etc etc

But to have a frank discussion about the illuminati perhaps needs a thread more suited to the task...maybe the 'is society prevented from discussing the big issues' thread in the news and politics section?

Also that's my thread so i can go as a deep down the rabbit hole as i like

 

[cvp12gh5]

Angry Scientist Finds UNEDUCATED Internet Comment and Delivers Badass Response

http://themetapicture.com/angry-sci...nternet-comment-and-delivers-badass-response/

 

[muir]

http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/do...he-other-side-of-the-story-is-not-being-told/

Doctors Against Vaccines: The Other Side of the Story is Not Being Told

The pro-Pharma mainstream media would like everyone to believe that doctors and “scientists” all agree that vaccines are safe and effective, and that dissenters are uneducated or uninformed parents.

Not true. Doctors and scientists who dare to speak out against the status quo, putting their own careers in jeopardy for telling the other side of the story, are of course few, and clearly in the minority. But that does not mean they do not exist. It just means they are fewer in number, because they value truth and the health and well-being of the public more than financial connections to the pharmaceutical industry.
Leslie Manookian, producer of “The Greater Good” movie, lists over 150 scientists and physicians who have questioned vaccines publicly. Read the list here.
Below, we bring you short videos from three different doctors who all do an excellent job of summarizing the “other side” of the story when it comes to vaccines. You will not hear this anywhere in the mainstream media.

1. Dr. Suzanne Humphries

[video=youtube;efto1LpWkKw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efto1LpWkKw[/video]

Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a practicing nephrologist (kidney physician), says the vaccine industry isn’t giving people both sides of the story, and parents need to get informed before subjecting their children to vaccines that can potentially cause serious harm or even death. She points out the reasoning of the government and pharmaceutical industry in claiming that “people are too stupid” to notice that vaccines are “miraculous,” and so they are going to give out vaccines anyway.
Quotes:
“Why must such a ‘wonderful product’ be forced on people?”
“Inventors of vaccines have chosen a belief system whereby infants are all born with inadequate immune systems (and therefore need to be “saved” from diseases by vaccines).”
Dr. Humphries states that most doctors think Mother Nature is flawed. The doctor doesn’t know how to take care of an immune system, because the doctor was never taught in medical school how to take care of an immune system. What you end up with is a whole society, from start to finish, that does not know how an immune system works, does not know how to take care of it, does not know how to replenish the nutrients and minerals that are needed, does not know how to ingest a diet that will support it, and then when it fails, “It’s God’s fault. We need a vaccine.”
Articles by Dr. Suzanne Humphries

2. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny

<a href="http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/doctors-against-vaccines-the-other-side-of-the-story-is-not-being-told/#sthash.YoR60dw1.dpuf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">[video=youtube;CAJb01ZiJNk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAJb01ZiJNk[/video]

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is a doctor of osteopathy and the director and founder of OsteoMed II, a clinic established in 1996 in Ohio. Dr. Tenpenny talks about the lack of safety studies conducted on vaccines, pointing out that studies are only conducted on healthy individuals which are not representative of a large part of society that vaccines are given to. People who are chronically sick and are taking many different kinds of medications are never studied.

Dr. Tenpenny also discusses whether or not vaccines are effective, pointing out the difference between “vaccine antibodies” and natural immunity. She helps people understand that when a claim is made saying “vaccines are effective”, it simply means it effectively created an “antibody” for a specific disease, but not that it has proven to prevent the person from contracting that disease. She discusses the growing number of cases in the U.S. where disease outbreaks are occurring among the vaccinated populations, who have been fully vaccinated for the disease from which they are suffering.
Articles by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny

3. Dr. Meryl Nass


<a href="http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/doctors-against-vaccines-the-other-side-of-the-story-is-not-being-told/#sthash.YoR60dw1.dpuf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">[video=youtube;oimq1YrDi3w]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oimq1YrDi3w[/video]

Dr. Meryl Nass is an M.D. in internal medicine. In this interview she exposes the revolving door that exists between pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines and the U.S. government. She covers the Gardasil controversy and says “Healthy girls don’t just die suddenly.” Dr. Nass is also an expert on the anthrax vaccine and Gulf War Syndrome.

Saying NO To Vaccines
By Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
You have legal options!​

​

More Info
FREE Shipping Available!​

Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History
by Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk​

​

Free Shipping Available!
Learn More​

309


49.3K


425


105




[h=2]Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Harm[/h]

eBook – Available for immediate download.

Canadian physician Dr. Andrew Moulden provided clear scientific evidence to prove that every dose of vaccine given to a child or an adult produces harm. The truth that he uncovered was rejected by the conventional medical system and the pharmaceutical industry. Nevertheless, his warning and his message to America remains as a solid legacy of the man who stood up against big pharma and their program to vaccinate every person on the Earth.
Dr. Moulden died unexpectedly in November of 2013 at age 49.
Because of the strong opposition from big pharma concerning Dr. Moulden’s research, we became concerned that the name of this brilliant researcher and his life’s work had nearly been deleted from the internet. His reputation was being disparaged, and his message of warning and hope was being distorted and buried without a tombstone. This book summarizes his teaching and is a must-read for everyone who wants to learn the “other-side” of the vaccine debate that the mainstream media routinely censors.
- See more at: http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/do...story-is-not-being-told/#sthash.YoR60dw1.dpuf