- MBTI
- IEI
- Enneagram
- 6w5 sp/sx
I recently took a close look at Enneagrams and took some tests...
I came out with 4, followed closely by 5, so 4w5. As an INTP, 5w4 would appear to 'fit' better, but really 4 explains me way better than 5 does.
This isn't exactly an example of serious conflict between 'types', but it's pretty clear that such conflict could arise quite easily between other types in a similar, and much more severe, manner. So my question is whether anyone here has, or knows someone who has, unusual combinations from the two methods and has had inner conflict because of it (or would just like to comment about the issue).
For me, the conflict manifests with a kind of strange relation with my feelings. I resist my feelings a little bit because I can't really function well unless I'm calm, but I have a strong tendency to push into my emotions when they well up. Also, I have gone through several moods of being overly expressive (I actually was like this for almost an entire semester last year, and now it seems very odd to people when I'm not expressive.) despite the fact that I get the most stimulation/flow from heavy analysis and problem solving. Probably related, I have a very strange fear of being incompetent in my artistic expression while being rather indifferent to my scientific competence (my current field; mostly for pragmatic reasons).
Not too surprisingly, I am very self-absorbed (still trying to get over this), so I have had difficulty taking an interest in anything unless it was about me and my interests. Conversely, I seem to identify with neither science/computer-nerd-types nor artistic/creative-types. This has led to a very detached lifestyle. It doesn't help that I am easily offended and brood over one-time offenses. On the plus side, when I degenerate to a needy, helpful individual (type 2), I tire myself out very fast and reassert my boundaries by default.
In other news, I'm curious as to whether there's been any work in substantiating the Enneagram in science. Some work has been done on the MBTI (clear correlations can be seen with the work here: http://www.cgjungpage.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=835&Itemid=40), so I thought perhaps there'd be similar research under the Enneagram. Even if there isn't I've so far found it pretty useful.
I came out with 4, followed closely by 5, so 4w5. As an INTP, 5w4 would appear to 'fit' better, but really 4 explains me way better than 5 does.
This isn't exactly an example of serious conflict between 'types', but it's pretty clear that such conflict could arise quite easily between other types in a similar, and much more severe, manner. So my question is whether anyone here has, or knows someone who has, unusual combinations from the two methods and has had inner conflict because of it (or would just like to comment about the issue).
For me, the conflict manifests with a kind of strange relation with my feelings. I resist my feelings a little bit because I can't really function well unless I'm calm, but I have a strong tendency to push into my emotions when they well up. Also, I have gone through several moods of being overly expressive (I actually was like this for almost an entire semester last year, and now it seems very odd to people when I'm not expressive.) despite the fact that I get the most stimulation/flow from heavy analysis and problem solving. Probably related, I have a very strange fear of being incompetent in my artistic expression while being rather indifferent to my scientific competence (my current field; mostly for pragmatic reasons).
Not too surprisingly, I am very self-absorbed (still trying to get over this), so I have had difficulty taking an interest in anything unless it was about me and my interests. Conversely, I seem to identify with neither science/computer-nerd-types nor artistic/creative-types. This has led to a very detached lifestyle. It doesn't help that I am easily offended and brood over one-time offenses. On the plus side, when I degenerate to a needy, helpful individual (type 2), I tire myself out very fast and reassert my boundaries by default.
In other news, I'm curious as to whether there's been any work in substantiating the Enneagram in science. Some work has been done on the MBTI (clear correlations can be seen with the work here: http://www.cgjungpage.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=835&Itemid=40), so I thought perhaps there'd be similar research under the Enneagram. Even if there isn't I've so far found it pretty useful.
Last edited: