nil

nil

Community Member
Joined
Last seen
Messages
203
Reaction score
10
Points
0

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • A
    I'm good.

    Oh yes, very much. But I've been caught up in other things. The last time I was researching it, I was reading about functions and debating my type between IEE, IEI and EII. (To be honest EII seems unlikely, but I don't know.)
    EyeSeeCold
    I'd doubt its accuracy(even more) after being learned in Socionics. Depending on how I want to understand the descriptions, I can get INTJ/P.
    Tulip
    No worries. It would probably be better not to read it at night time.
    Good night.
    EyeSeeCold
    Progress should be easy now.

    Good luck with your calculus :D. I'll finish extra PMs that still have potential.
    EyeSeeCold
    I began to prepare an analytical response, however, I say with confidence(I think I've lost my credibility by now :P) that I think you are ILE. It would really explain a lot. You might think EII sounds weird if you are ILE, but lately I realized accentuated PoLRs/Vulnerable functions cause people to appear like their Supervisors.

    Ignoring Ni - it's why we couldn't get clear cut self-analysis. Us being Contraries - mutual fascination but inability to reach mutual understanding. I knew I was looking to close to see the big picture.
    EyeSeeCold
    When I first took it, I got back LII. Turned out I was ILI. The problem was MBTI bias, not the test - at least in that one instance.
    EyeSeeCold
    Yes, I can see how it was possible to construct a mathematical system. You don't have to rationalize. :P

    It's hard to tell because there is not much friction. Systems are the epitome of Ti, but not everything there is to it.
    EyeSeeCold
    That's it! lol

    That analytical style where you block out everything else and concern yourself only with what you're looking at..Ti
    But you use it so infrequently..
    EyeSeeCold
    Well I was just pointing out that I'm already focused on getting something out of arguments and discussions, so I'm already inclined to work around fallacies; I don't get bogged down in structure and analysis. Though knowing them couldn't hurt.

    Don't you mean an INTJ or "True Friend"? :P
    Yes, I suppose that would help. I had an idea to map out INTPs for INTPforum.
    EyeSeeCold
    About the article, didn't interest me much. I'm aware that fallacies happen, and I don't mind the occasional slip up, as long as the persons involved are willing to work towards agreement. "I'm right, you're wrong" arguments disgust me.

    The types are the same theoretical types. The descriptions will not be similar because types are approached from different perspectives.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top