This is a really interesting article on the 8 cognitive processes which explains methods for their visual identification. It is a new team/project aiming to reshape the current MBTI system with a more empirically-grounded psychology.
Thoughts? :3
Yes. The functions emit somewhat different variations of themselves depending on their ordering. Most notably, the first and fourth function emit the greatest percent of cues.1. Do functional cues change between types with the same functions? (An ENFJ's compared to an INFJ's or INTP's Fe, for example.)
a) if so, used for different purposes?
b) if not, how do you verify a particular type?
It's actually quite interesting that you mentioned this.2. Could abnormal functional growth/repression simulate mental disorders?
a) if so, would direct neural stimulation of associated brain regions help?
(like the brain's area 25 being zapped to relieve depression)
Even being blind, we could still narrow a person's type to two or four easily. But yes, it would take a psychoanalysis to fully confirm such a person. All of our reads are done in two parts: physiognomical analysis and psychoanalysis.3. How would one read someone who is sensory deprived? (i.e blindness)
a) Could these limitations actually limit functional development,
or would one such simply develop functions in a different manner (probably more abstractly) than usual?
b) if not, how do you verify a particular type?
Error - 404
Sorry, this page has been removed or does not exist any longer.
The link is dead.
-Jah