People are way too over-hyped about both candidates. There is a reason we have checks and balances in our political system.
I agree though I would add a few points.
We
had checks and balances...Citizen’s United and the McCutcheon decision firmly destroyed what small bit of real democracy we had left.
The people didn’t vote on the candidates...there were people from both sides of the voter scale that were discounted at the polls in the primary to decide who the nominees are (i.e. anyone registered anything other than the party they are voting for - don’t count.)...we’ve had non-stop media interference with them practically naming who the nominees were and discounting everyone else...they are still doing it...the news, used to be a little more non-biased, they do not call out either candidate for the blatant lies that both of them have told...instead, they help spread the lies - both FOX and MSNBC.
The guy with the most money shouldn’t have a vote that counts any more than anyone else’s, but now we have gobs of money with people like the Koch Bros. donating -
The Washington Post, "Koch-backed network aims to spend nearly $1 billion in run-up to 2016," Jan. 26, 2015. Politico, "The Kochs put a price on 2016: $889 million," Jan. 26, 2015. USA Today, "Koch brothers set $889 million budget for 2016,"
Donald does not have the temperament, experience, or empathy to be President (his recent remarks about the Purple Heart, and the disgusting remarks about a honorable fallen soldier...kicking out a crying baby? Really? Moronic.), Hilary (gag) at least has been vetted and knows how the system works...though I doubt she's very empathetic either.
Yea! Two sociopaths!
I agree with you
@Sandie33 she isn’t a saint...it’s now a vote for a giant douche or a shit sandwich...we always seem to end up having to pick the lesser of two evils...that’s not democracy...democracy doesn’t have delegates or super-delegates...they don’t have an army of lobbyists in Congress giving them campaign contributions, vacations, and promises of jobs in their firms upon leaving Congress.
We wouldn’t have a Congress that purposefully obstructs anything other than military and mining contracts (they certainly shouldn’t read “Green Eggs and Ham” and shut down part of the government costing us millions of wasted tax dollars) - excuse me, but could Congress at least side with the people they represent 50% of the time? Is that asking too much?
If we were truly the “land of the free”, we wouldn’t have more people in prison in the US than any other country in the world (let that sink in), more than China, more than Russia.
Most of those prisons are privately run as well - with lobbyists of their own pushing for more and more laws that can be broken and longer sentences for those convicted...in fact many of them have contracts with the states they are in that if they don’t have a census above a certain level the state still has to pay a fee for the empty beds - incentivizing them to imprison people.
We are practically back to being serfs.
We should let the people vote, and then count said votes...the one with the most wins.
That’s Democracy.
(the sandwich kinda has Trump hair ahahaha)