Relationships with parents and Enneagram | INFJ Forum

Relationships with parents and Enneagram

arbygil

Passing through
Nov 29, 2008
11,684
1,400
881
MBTI
INFJ
Enneagram
9w1
Very telling article. Shows how your E-type may have come about, based on your relationship with your parents. If you still have problems figuring out your Enneagram, this article may help you determine it (I was the Neutral child with the Active parents).

Original link from Ptypes here.

Does this match your relationship with your parents...? Only you can know for sure. ;)

Three Basic Orientations

The three orientations are an expression of the Law of Three, on which the entire Enneagram concept is based. This law states that there are three kinds of forces that act in the human nature - the Active force, the Responsive force and the Neutral force and that each person is born with a natural preference for one of them.

These three forces are similar to the Hornevian Groups (Assertive, Compliant and Withdrawn respectively), but they are used here in a different context, to describe inborn traits and parental styles rather than established personality.

Here are the associated traits for each basic orientation:

Active: demanding, assertive, bossy, outspoken, intimidating, egocentric, expressive, willful.

Responsive: supportive, responsive, engaging, affectionate, friendly, sympathetic, cooperative.

Neutral: avoidant, withdrawn, indifferent, apathetic, absent, reserved, ignoring, neglectful.

Apparently, each child comes into the world with one of these predefined attitudes toward their environment and each parent will address their children with a certain parenting style, which can be, but isn't necessarily determined by their Enneagram type.

Any Enneagram type can use any of the three orientations to attend to their children. For example - an Enneatype 5 can be a Responsive parent, an Enneatype 8 might use a Neutral approach with their offspring, while an Enneatype 1 may lean towards an Active style. What determines the environmental component of a child's future type is not necessarily the main caretaker's type, but rather their particular approach to relating to the child.


Nine Interaction Scenarios: Child vs. Parent

Here are the 9 childhood scenarios that correspond to each of the 9 Enneagram types.

Active child vs. Active parent
This scenario is thought to produce Enneagram type 8.

The child and parent experience open conflicts on a regular basis. They both have different agendas and oppose each other, thus giving rise to power struggles and explosive arguments. The Active parent is impatient and intolerant of the child's rebellious nature and tries to impose his will in an authoritarian fashion. The Active child, on the other hand, becomes aggressive, argumentative and persistent in getting his own way. The relationship becomes a sort of battlefield, which is how the child will later perceive the world around him (type 8).

Such a childhood scenario encourages the child to develop a keen eye for spotting other people's weaknesses and a thirst for imposing their will in an overly aggressive fashion. They learn to be assertive, strong and deny their fears and feelings of intimidation. These are the traits they needed to have in order to stand up to their domineering parents and still keep their own Active inborn approach.

Active child vs. Responsive parent
This scenario is thought to produce Enneagram type 7

The demands and concerns of the Active child are usually received with benevolence and a supportive, encouraging attitude. This creates a tolerant environment in which the child can express himself openly and receive attention without much effort from his part. The Active child becomes self-confident, carefree and expects his interactions to be positive and favorable to his needs. The Responsive parent is sympathetic and loving, thus stimulating the child's playful, self-expressive side and giving him a good deal of personal freedom.

This childhood scenario promotes a cheerful, optimistic type who knows how to charm and manipulate others into easily getting his way. Entertaining and expressive, such a child may later expect instant gratification for all his needs and desires and avoid investing time and effort into long-term goals.

Active child vs. Neutral parent
This scenario is thought to produce Enneagram type 4

In this relationship, the child usually tries to grab the attention of an indifferent or absent parent, by expressing himself with increasing intensity, until a response is achieved. The Active child may act in a dramatic, exaggerated manner, attempting to get his message across to the unconcerned caretaker. The Neutral caretaker will typically ignore the child's emotional needs, making the youngster feel frustrated, misunderstood and possibly abandoned. Sometimes the child turns these negative feelings inwardly, believing that they are unlovable and not special enough to deserve attention.

This scenario teaches the Active children that they are different than other children that seem to be getting the support they lack. They want to make themselves heard so they amplify their feelings, resorting to dramatic expressions of their emotions. These children may later become overly sensitive, artistic and theatrical, but also melancholic, self-loathing and depressive.

Responsive child vs. Active parent
This scenario is thought to produce Enneagram type 1

This interaction is generally centered around the parent's agenda, to which the child will subscribe in order to receive the desired approval. The Active parent will be demanding, dominating and will criticize any perceived "bad" behavior. The Responsive child, on the other hand, is unusually sensitive to criticism so he will try to adjust and adhere to the parent's values and perspectives, by being obedient, well-behaved and an altogether "good kid". This attitude will help him build the desired rapport with the fastidious main caretaker.

With time, the child will learn to put aside his real needs and wishes in order to do the right thing, to be correct and morally ethical. These types will prefer to have a clear set of standards and rules to adhere to and will only feel worthy and lovable when they live a righteous life, in accordance with their upstanding principles. Their parents taught them that acceptance comes only through obedience and discipline.

Responsive child vs. Responsive parent
This scenario is thought to produce Enneagram type 6

This child will usually establish a very close relationship with his caretaker and will tend to become dependent on the nurturing, affectionate figure that offers him support and understanding. A strong desire for harmonious relationships is created and the Responsive child will reject and feel threatened by conflicts and lack of stability. Such types will seek playmates and groups that share their values and interests and will take an 'us against the world' stance, typically towards unfamiliar people and circumstances.

These Responsive children will prefer to play by the rules in order to keep themselves safe from any disharmony that will endanger their comforting, supportive relationships. They will be playful, endearing and loyal to their chosen groups and intimates, while at the same time remaining alert and vigilant to avoid any conflicts and hidden threats. Suspicion of other people's motives can arise as a protection from abandonment and rejection - they are in fact very afraid of losing their safe, nurturing grounds.

Responsive child vs. Neutral parent
This scenario is thought to produce Enneagram type 2

In this case, the Responsive child will act in a pleasing, appealing matter but will most likely encounter an indifferent attitude on the part of the Neutral parent. Confronted with this apathy and lack of interest, the child can only resort to becoming even more pleasing and irresistible to the parent, until he manages to break through the shell of indifference and obtain the desired rapport. Such types will be helpful, empathetic, lovable and attractive and will have a knack for getting on the same wavelength with their parents - they know when and how to approach them in order to obtain their attention.

Growing up, the Responsive children will learn to intuitively sense and assess other people's moods and will know exactly how to fulfill their needs in order to be appreciated and loved by them. They have a wide repertoire of seductive behaviors and know exactly which approach to use in order to successfully engage others into a close relationship.

Neutral child vs. Active parent
This scenario is thought to produce Enneagram type 9

The Neutral child is often overwhelmed and frightened by the controlling, domineering Active parent. Lacking self-assertion skills, he prefers to withdraw and stay out of the way, minimizing his own needs and avoiding the parent as much as possible. On the few occasions the child reaches out to the caretaker, he ends up feeling rejected and bullied around for no apparent reason, which causes him to withdraw again. The loneliness, however, also feels like rejection and soon enough the youngster will be ambivalent towards both being alone and being with others.

Most of the time, a compromise will be made. This type will seek out company but will not invest themselves in it, preferring to keep in the background and go with the flow, partly removed from their actual situation. When alone, they will avoid introspection, which will bring about old feelings of depression and rejection, instead they'd rather numb themselves out with food, TV or other unimportant routines to avoid emotional pain.

Neutral child vs. Responsive parent
This scenario is thought to produce Enneagram type 5

In this relationship, the Responsive parent is inclined to give a lot of unrequested attention to the Neutral child, who perceives his parent's supportive and affectionate attitude as a form of smothering. The youngster will tend to withdraw from his environment, preferring solitary activities and contemplation, but as opposed to the previous scenario (of type 9), loneliness will not be accompanied by a feeling of rejection. At the contrary, being alone is a matter of choice and it gives a feeling of security and well-being, knowing that there is always someone to communicate with when they decide to seek out company.

Such children are genuine loners, who prefer and enjoy their solitude. They are introspective, insightful and love learning and discovering things on their own, usually rejecting any help or intervention from the outside. They are afraid of being intruded upon because their parents used to make a fuss over them and suffocate them with attention and demands for closeness.

Neutral child vs. Neutral parent
This scenario is thought to produce Enneagram type 3

This Neutral child's solitude is encouraged by his parent's own withdrawal and indifference, which doesn’t necessarily make the Neutral child feel openly rejected, but rather intrigues and challenges him. Serious, focused and rather unemotional, this youngster will most likely try to fulfill his occasional need for attention by impressing his parents with outstanding accomplishments and high aspirations, which make him feel worthy and valuable in their eyes.

Later in life, these children become motivated achievers who put great emphasis on results, performance, efficiency and a successful image that will make others appreciate and admire them. Deep inside they dislike being ignored because it makes them doubt their own value, therefore they tend to hide their weaknesses and flaws and project a desirable, attractive, "I-have-it-all" persona.
 
Does this match your relationship with your parents...? Only you can know for sure. ;)

Responsive child with responsive parents - type 6 enneagram. Yep.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandeep Atre
My main question in regard to this, is what if your parents are different types?
 
Neutral child vs. Responsive parent - Type 5.

Huh. Spot on.
 
According to this, it seems 9 or 5 makes the most sense for me. Neutral child vs Responsive parent or Neutral child vs Active parent. My father I believe was an active parent, mother would have been responsive.

neutral child vs responsive parent - "Such children are genuine loners, who prefer and enjoy their solitude. They are introspective, insightful and love learning and discovering things on their own, usually rejecting any help or intervention from the outside. They are afraid of being intruded upon because their parents used to make a fuss over them and suffocate them with attention and demands for closeness."
Absolutely yes.

neutral child vs active parent
- All of that applies to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandeep Atre
My main question in regard to this, is what if your parents are different types?

In this case the types of the parents don't apply to your type; it's how they raised you that can determine what your type is. In other words, if you had a parent who was type 9, they'd be a "neutral" type. If this is your main caregiver, then you'd have to determine if you are either a neutral, active, or responsive person to determine what your Enneagram might be.

This is not set in stone, however; but your parents may have had an effect on your Enneagram type, because they raised you and provided your security (or insecurity),
 
According to this, it seems 9 or 5 makes the most sense for me. Neutral child vs Responsive parent or Neutral child vs Active parent. My father I believe was an active parent, mother would have been responsive.

neutral child vs responsive parent - "Such children are genuine loners, who prefer and enjoy their solitude. They are introspective, insightful and love learning and discovering things on their own, usually rejecting any help or intervention from the outside. They are afraid of being intruded upon because their parents used to make a fuss over them and suffocate them with attention and demands for closeness."
Absolutely yes.

neutral child vs active parent
- All of that applies to me.

I'd say, then, whichever parent has or had the biggest influence on you would be the one that influenced your enneagram type. If your father had the bigger influence, then active + you would be your enneagram type. If your mother did, then responsive + you would be your enneagram type.

Assuming it works for you, that is.
 
Depends on the parent. I also think there is possible progression -one style may be dominant at an earlier age, and as a result, another type of relational style develops as a young adult or teen.
 
Last edited:
In this case the types of the parents don't apply to your type; it's how they raised you that can determine what your type is. In other words, if you had a parent who was type 9, they'd be a "neutral" type. If this is your main caregiver, then you'd have to determine if you are either a neutral, active, or responsive person to determine what your Enneagram might be.

This is not set in stone, however; but your parents may have had an effect on your Enneagram type, because they raised you and provided your security (or insecurity),
By type I meant active/responsive/neutral. Mostly for myself - My parents were seperated when I was very young, and had quite different parenting styles, but I spent equal time with both. So I'm not sure?
 
Well I just took the test and it turns out I'm an enneagram 3, makes sense I suppose.
 
I think it fits.

I wonder how wings played within this? Does wings implies another (second, related?) type of affection received?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gaze
My parents had both the Active and Responsive approach. I was Active.
Which resulted in an 8w7 enneargram child. :3
 
I had a VERY active parent, and a responsive parent. I was a responsive child. I came out as 1w2.
 
By type I meant active/responsive/neutral. Mostly for myself - My parents were seperated when I was very young, and had quite different parenting styles, but I spent equal time with both. So I'm not sure?

*Nod.* I'd say the parent who influenced you the most is probably the most telling. You can be equally shuttled between two parents, but you probably have a parent who has influenced you the most, for good or for ill. You can have a horrible parent and a good parent, and you could live with your good parent for all your life...but if the horrible parent is the one who impacted you most, then your Enneagram would reflect their influence instead of the good parent's influence.

We usually are products of our environment. I lived with my mother growing up and saw my father during the summers, but I'd say my mother was probably more Responsive and my father more Active...but he unconsciously influenced me more.
 
I am Type 9, and this was utterly brilliant. :thumb:


cheers,
Ian
 
Holy shit this works for both of my parents - i have traits of both 1 and 6 (for each parent), i was the Responsible child (with a bit of neutral later on)
 
It makes a lot of sense for me as well. My enneagram tritype is 1-2-6 all three of which come from a responsive child, which is definitely me. My dad was a very very active parent (for refrence he is ESTJ). My parents divorced shortly before I turned 4 years old, so I would see my dad on the weekends and be with my mother during the week. My mother (an INFJ 9w8), was absolutely a responsive parent to me, and was extremely supportive of me. There were also times where my father would act like a neutral parent when he wasn't being active, and this was largely out of him being cold to me if he was punishing me or something.

Yup, for me this all makes complete 100% sense. That being said, I don't want this to sound like I had terrible parents. Both of my parents in their own ways were fantastic to me.
 
Type 6, 7 and 8 all fit but none of them is really spot on.
 
7w8
My parents were evidently a lot harder on my older brother (kicked the shit out of him). Perhaps its a cultural thing. Not that they were total softies with me, but I would say my parents doted on me. My brother on the other had was determined I grow a spine though.