@
magister343
Why do you think that Fi and Fe is reversed in socionics? I think it's the same thing:
Verbs describing relationships between people
Fe describes external manifestations of relationships (meet, date, make friends, be friends, flirt, break up, make up, break off, suck up), while Fi describes the subject's experience of relationships (be grateful, admire, love, fall in love, hate, be offended, be embarrassed, value).
Verbs describing influencing feelings
Fe focuses on the external (observable) actions associated with emotional interaction (excite, praise, get going, hurt, fool, offend, cheer up, scare, make laugh, comfort, calm down), while Fi focuses on internal feelings (trouble, get tired of, make nervious, offend, let down, scare, irritate, make mad, make upsent, calm). Note that the same words can be used, but with a different emphasis.
Abstract nouns for expressing emotions
Fe focuses on visible emotional states (edginess, gloominess, breakdown, boredom, quietness, ecstasy, horror, panic, enthusiasm, sarcasm), while Fi focuses on internal feelings (guilt, unrest, delight, pride, annoyance, fright, love, hate, hurt, feeling, shame, embarrassment).
Adverbs describing how actions are performed and one's attitude toward them
Fe, again, focuses on visible emotional attitudes (gladly, dismally, wonderfully, half-heartedly, discreetly, sarcastically), while Fi focuses on internal attitudes (frankly, honestly, dishonestly, decently, in a friendly way, in a good way, in a bad way, tactfully, tactlessly).
From
here.
Yet, those Fe and Fi descriptions are quite "mechanical".
Hrr, I want to understand that system but I look into it through MBTI glasses.