http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14743589
If you are interested in The Economist's take on population and fertility, this is very long and dry as a bone article, but it raises some interesting points.
I
The Economist!
(One note: it claims a woman's reproductive years are "15-49". Goodgawadallmighty, thank heaven for birth control.)
If you are interested in The Economist's take on population and fertility, this is very long and dry as a bone article, but it raises some interesting points.
I
The Economist!(One note: it claims a woman's reproductive years are "15-49". Goodgawadallmighty, thank heaven for birth control.)