- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 1w2 sx/so/sp
Ok, so I am bringing my type into question again. Several things have spurred this (talking to people, self reflection, and recent reuslts). I know many of you here feel that I am an INFJ. I need to seriously concider if I am an ISFJ though, even possibly an INTJ or ISTJ. I am going to focus on INFJ/ISFJ though, as I feel those two types are the biggest in question. Now, I recently took another cognitive function test again. While this one is not as reliable and thoruguh, it still is good at giving insight. It gave me: Si=Te=Ni>Fe>Fi>Ti>Ne>Se.
It is pretty clear to me (despite that result) that my Fe is stronger then my Te. Reason being is I feel more of an alignment with Fe in terms of emotions. I am not able to compartemetalize them and make them do what I want. I try really hard to do so, and I will in a way "force" it, but it never gets to the point that I want. I care far too much about the emotions and situations of others for me not to be controlled by Fe over Te. I am just able to use Te on myself, and I can link it with Fe when I am leading something.
This now brings me to the biggest issue: Si vs. Ni. These two scores for a while have been extremely close. Ni seems to always win out by a tiny amount, but not always. On classic MBTI tests, I have never once tested as a senor, but my intuitive score is often low, in the 20's/30's. This is because of me largely (while disliking both) preferring Ne over Se, which ends up making this score as such. I truly do have aspects of both Ni and Si, but I am wondering if I am over estimating my Ni. I am a highly intutive person. I rely on it for nearly everything. However, for big things, using inutition is so stressful for me. I much prefer Si, because I can rely on what has already happened; it's reliable. I refrence the past for everything when it comes to giving advice, predicting things, ect. It makes things more concerete for me and tangiable. I can truly trust it. I wonder if I have tricked myself into thinking if it is inutition. Another point for Si, is the fact that I can not break social rules, at all. I am so easily embaressed by people doing anything out of the norm in social contexts. Just watching them makes me feel unconfortable, and I will have the urge to yell at my friends for doing so. It's rude, and should not be done unless we are on our own.
I have a very high Judging score (in the 70's/80's) and I think this is because of Si and Ni. While they are both perceving functions, they appear like judging functions because of how they are filtered. I wonder if Si is the reason for this. I am anal retentive to a high degree, and if things are not done just right, I get flustered. Of course, if I give myself enough time I can bend my own rules to apply to something new, but I need the time to do it and accept it.
I don't want this to go for too long as an intro. I will stop right here for now, and add more and discuss as people comment and reply.
It is pretty clear to me (despite that result) that my Fe is stronger then my Te. Reason being is I feel more of an alignment with Fe in terms of emotions. I am not able to compartemetalize them and make them do what I want. I try really hard to do so, and I will in a way "force" it, but it never gets to the point that I want. I care far too much about the emotions and situations of others for me not to be controlled by Fe over Te. I am just able to use Te on myself, and I can link it with Fe when I am leading something.
This now brings me to the biggest issue: Si vs. Ni. These two scores for a while have been extremely close. Ni seems to always win out by a tiny amount, but not always. On classic MBTI tests, I have never once tested as a senor, but my intuitive score is often low, in the 20's/30's. This is because of me largely (while disliking both) preferring Ne over Se, which ends up making this score as such. I truly do have aspects of both Ni and Si, but I am wondering if I am over estimating my Ni. I am a highly intutive person. I rely on it for nearly everything. However, for big things, using inutition is so stressful for me. I much prefer Si, because I can rely on what has already happened; it's reliable. I refrence the past for everything when it comes to giving advice, predicting things, ect. It makes things more concerete for me and tangiable. I can truly trust it. I wonder if I have tricked myself into thinking if it is inutition. Another point for Si, is the fact that I can not break social rules, at all. I am so easily embaressed by people doing anything out of the norm in social contexts. Just watching them makes me feel unconfortable, and I will have the urge to yell at my friends for doing so. It's rude, and should not be done unless we are on our own.
I have a very high Judging score (in the 70's/80's) and I think this is because of Si and Ni. While they are both perceving functions, they appear like judging functions because of how they are filtered. I wonder if Si is the reason for this. I am anal retentive to a high degree, and if things are not done just right, I get flustered. Of course, if I give myself enough time I can bend my own rules to apply to something new, but I need the time to do it and accept it.
I don't want this to go for too long as an intro. I will stop right here for now, and add more and discuss as people comment and reply.