Evolution of an INFJ (Cognitive Development of IN types) | INFJ Forum

Evolution of an INFJ (Cognitive Development of IN types)

M

Miso

Newbie
Nov 27, 2015
19
5
0
MBTI
INTJ
Disclaimer: bogus work by Miso
I just wanna have a thread about this okay!

Cognitive functions are already present in the child
The child doesn't know how to use them
The child tends to function use references:
  • Tranquil Figure
  • Authoritative Figure
  • Well Defined
  • Poorly Defined

and environmental feedback:
  • introverted functions = externally rewarded
  • extroverted functions = internally rewarded

INFJ

Sponge Stage [Se(Ni)-Fi-Fe]
  • Ti > af/pd (no feedback) objective detachment to function
  • Te > af/wd (negative feedback) subjective detachment to function
  • Fi-Fe > tf/pd (conflicting feedback) objective attachment to function
  • Se-Ni > tf/wd (positive feedback) subjective attachment to function
Ne-Si > (vaguely demonstrated) running in the background

Coral stage [Fe-Ti-Se(Ni)]
The child begins to stabilize function stack to lessen energy exhaustion
objectively detached Ti's preference of Fe over conflicting Fi
Fi becomes backup to Fe
new associations formed
Ti gains subjective attachment via Se
Ni becomes background function
  • positive feedback
  • stabilization
  • negative feedback
  • introverted background functions summoned to receive external reward
  • Si is used
  • negative feedback persists
  • Si becomes unhealthy


Turtle stage [Ni-Fe]
The child re-evaluates environment
Problems are ascertained
Fe-Ti-Se unable to solve the problem
The child draws back and begins to explore
Ni set-up
seek nullification of negative feedback via Ni
Fe supports Ni premises
Ni-Fe builds identity
Se's priority weakens
  • positive feedback
  • stabilization

Fish Stage [Ni-Fe-Ti-Se]
Ti-Se redeemed
  • new associations formed
  • positive feedback
  • stabilization


INTJ

Sponge Stage [Se(Ni)-Ti-Te]
  • Fi > af/pd (no feedback) objective detachment to function
  • Te > af/wd (negative feedback) subjective detachment to function
  • Ti-Te > tf/pd (conflicting feedback) objective attachment to function
  • Se-Ni > tf/wd (positive feedback) subjective attachment to function
Ne-Si > (vaguely demonstrated) running in the background

Coral stage [Te-Fi-Se(Ni)]
The child begins to stabilize function stack to lessen energy exhaustion
objectively detached Fi's preference of Te over conflicting Ti
Ti becomes backup to Te
new associations formed
Fi gains subjective attachment via Se
Ni becomes background function
  • positive feedback
  • stabilization
  • negative feedback
  • introverted background functions summoned to receive external reward
  • Si is used
  • negative feedback persists
  • Si becomes unhealthy


Turtle stage [Ni-Te]
The child re-evaluates environment
Problems are ascertained
Te-Fi-Se unable to solve the problem
The child draws back and begins to explore
Ni set-up
seek nullification of negative feedback via Ni
Te supports Ni premises
Ni-Te builds identity
Se's priority weakens
  • positive feedback
  • stabilization

Fish Stage [Ni-Te-Fi-Se]
Fi-Se redeemed
  • new associations formed
  • positive feedback
  • stabilization

INFP

Sponge Stage [Te(Fi)-Ni-Ne]
  • Si > af/pd (no feedback) objective detachment to function
  • Se > af/wd (negative feedback) subjective detachment to function
  • Ni-Ne > tf/pd (conflicting feedback) objective attachment to function
  • Te-Fi > tf/wd (positive feedback) subjective attachment to function
Fe-Ti > (vaguely demonstrated) running in the background

Coral stage [Ne-Si-Te(Fi)]
The child begins to stabilize function stack to lessen energy exhaustion
objectively detached Si's preference of Ne over conflicting Ni
Ni becomes backup to Ne
new associations formed
Si gains subjective attachment via Te
becomes background function
  • positive feedback
  • stabilization
  • negative feedback
  • introverted background functions summoned to receive external reward
  • Ti is used
  • negative feedback persists
  • Ti becomes unhealthy


Turtle stage [Fi-Ne]
The child re-evaluates environment
Problems are ascertained
Ne-Si-Te unable to solve the problem
The child draws back and begins to explore
Fi set-up
seek nullification of negative feedback via Fi
Ne supports Fi premises
Fi-Ne builds identity
Te's priority weakens
positive feedback
stabilization
Fish Stage [Fi-Ne-Si-Te]
Si-Te redeemed
new associations formed
  • positive feedback
  • stabilization


INTP

Sponge Stage [Fe(Ti)-Ni-Ne]
  • Si > af/pd (no feedback) objective detachment to function
  • Se > af/wd (negative feedback) subjective detachment to function
  • Ni-Ne > tf/pd (conflicting feedback) objective attachment to function
  • Fe-Ti > tf/wd (positive feedback) subjective attachment to function
Te-Fi > (vaguely demonstrated) running in the background

Coral stage [Ne-Si-Fe(Ti)]
The child begins to stabilize function stack to lessen energy exhaustion
objectively detached Si's preference of Ne over conflicting Ni
Ni becomes backup to Ne
new associations formed
Si gains subjective attachment via Fe
becomes background function
  • positive feedback
  • stabilization
  • negative feedback
  • introverted background functions summoned to receive external reward
  • Fi is used
  • negative feedback persists
  • Fi becomes unhealthy


Turtle stage [Ti-Ne]
The child re-evaluates environment
Problems are ascertained
Ne-Si-Fe unable to solve the problem
The child draws back and begins to explore
Ti set-up
seek nullification of negative feedback via Ti
Ne supports Ti premises
Ti-Ne builds identity
Fe's priority weakens
  • positive feedback
  • stabilization

Fish Stage [Ti-Ne-Si-Fe]
Si-Fe redeemed
  • new associations formed
  • positive feedback
  • stabilization

mostly based on Cognitive Theory with a dash of Miso's unfounded confabulations, cloudy observations and swift judgment...
now quick, leave before the fire swells!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back