A thief could be working hard, but does that make him a good person?
A drug dealer could be working hard, but does that make him a good person?
A murderer could be working hard, but does that make him a good person?
No way.
All good persons don't work hard either.
Working hard can be a part of being a good person, but it doesn't make them any less or more of a good person.
It seems to me that STJs have this "hard work is good" mentality just as deeply rooted as NFJs wants to be nice to other people. We don't even question why we do it. Tell me if you think my generalization is wrong.
I see that all the time also.Good points. But just to put it in perspective, I'm not really referring to those cases in which someone is working hard on something unethical or illegal.
But yet, we treat those who work hard as being better people than those who don't, in our estimation, work as hard as we think they should. This is a common stereotype which is so prevalent that it boggles the mind. I see so many people everyday arguing that because they work hard umpteen hours a week that they are better or more ethical or good than those who don't work as much as they do. Yet, these same people who work hard for their families, associates, or friends will justify bad behavior towards others but think they are good people. They think they're doing someone a huge favor by being good or nice to someone outside of their social circle.
The nicest and most giving people in the world don't necessarily "work hard" the way everyone else may have to but yet they are ignored or underestimated because they are not proving themselves through "working hard" as defined by the larger culture in which we live.
Can't say it's right or wrong because each person is different whatever their type. But i do question the idea that simply being a hard worker makes you a good person. Of course, we know that there are many abusive individuals who work hard, but when they come home they don't treat their families with respect. They are physically, verbally, or emotionally abusive to family members, and use the fact that they are working hard to take care of their families, as an excuse for their behavior.
I agree. Most people here seem to. That made me curious about the typology aspect of it.
I think a strong work ethic is a good quality, but I don't think it necessarily makes someone a good person. In fact, I am a little skeptical of thinking that anyone one quality should be used as blanket determinant of someone's 'goodness.' Someone can be really nice to people, for example, but really rotten to their spouse or children. Someone might pay all their taxes and donate what they can to charity, but they make money on the side by trafficking cocaine to minors.
I think overall goodness is more situation-oriented than anything. So at work, yeah, when there's a project deadline and everyone else has been slacking, the person who manages their time and puts in the work is going to be viewed as the good guy/girl. But are they really a good person? Depends who you're asking and what they themselves value as good.
I think it's the same as one claiming to be a 'good person' only because they're kind / smart / charming / ruthless / competent / able / handsome / sexy / whatever.
It's like making a dish with only one ingredients. A salad with one vegetable. A painting with one color. It's very restricted and limited even when they can be good or actually good.
But in this case, their hard-working can be 'foolishly headstrong' in my PoV, just as how my apparent lack of activity (even when I'm studying) can be 'lazying around doing nothing' in theirs.
/shrugs
it's a problem of perspective. Always that : |