At it again.

oh FFS....

This makes my soul tired..

 

*facepalm*

do they even realize what they are saying...and they really believe themselves...

what a ridiculous notion...

this makes my brain ache...

 

when people are on slippery slopes, they think they are snowboarding...

anything to detract away from the the sub-culture of pedophilia within their own organization. or is it a sub-culture.

I swore I'd stay off of these kinds of threads but this shit here is ridiculous.

now that this is said.. :bolt:

 

And homosexuals will continue to be buggered by these people until they use me as their general. I fight the same way the church does.

Why use the marquis of queensbury rules when they fight savate?

 

Nobility will get you nowhere.

Do you think the Haitians simply protested the rulers of St. Dominique for freedom?
Do you think the Chinese simply asked the Imperial to leave them alone?
Do you think the French were given freedom from the Catholic Church and Nobles by sending a signed petition?

No, Rights need to come from blood sacrifice. Freedom needs to be fought for.

Martin Luther King Jr was assassinated, but his movement had more members than yours, and more public support.
Ghandi was a one off, and only because he had numbers on his side.

 

Under my leadership, the blood sacrifice will be theirs.

 

Courts would be one of my five battlefields.

Dirty fighting like they do.

 

rofl, with this twisted logic, they could also claim that all heterosexuals are pedophiles, considering that, pedophilia as an occurrence happens in both genders and between both genders.

 

As a Catholic, I can't help but notice the comments in this thread use expressions like "they say.." or "they should..."

The discussion is about two bishops, out of over 5000 - which is about 0.04% of all Catholic bishops.

Whatever either of these two bishops say is their opinion, and is not representative of Catholic opinion. So... please, less bigotry please.

 

Except these people are very high in the chain of command and the catholic church is responsible for what they are saying. Also, their attitude is very widespread.

 

Anyone can believe in jesus, doesn't make the person Catholic. Catholics must recognise the authority of Rome and the Hierarchy of the Holy Roman Catholic Church, and all their bigoted bullshit. If you don't want to recognise that, there are a whole host of other denominations you could belong to... Anglicanism is the most like Catholicism, except the authority stops with the bishop, never higher, and they take their beliefs straight from the bible, not any dogma outside of that.

 

True, but their personal attitude is not Catholic doctrine.

This is acceptable and doesn't bother me - my objection is the generalisation made by applying the comments of an individual to the whole group.

One is not required to believe any bigotted bullshit, but only the doctrine/dogma the hierarcy was instituted to preserve.

 

What the Church says is in its doctrine - which is actually composed of relatively few dogmas, a few different creeds and a few dozen encyclicals.

The Church does allow people to say what they think. If there is confusion between opinion and doctrine, the Church might require the bishop to clarify or apologise. But it is pretty clear that the bishop was just spouting a personal theory. I am of the opinion that unless a bishop is teaching the faith, or morals he should just shut up and pray.

 

Wasn't there a thread a while back equating Christians to pedaphiles?