CNN's disbelief that their integrity is being questioned is so strange. You'd think that an organization that scrutinises public figures/organisations would be very open to scrutiny themselves.
CNN, tabloid fake news.
- Thread starter Eventhorizon
- Start date
A very logical assumption. I won't even go over with you the insurmountable evidence to back it. You already know what you are choosing to be willfully ignorant about.
You call CNN fake news yet listen to Fox? Really?
Fox is the most accurate factual reporting available. Meaning when you go back nd check sources and facts, they actually check out. Doesn't mean they are always right in their opinions though.
Whereas CNNs reporting on Trump and Russia is a prime example of their type of reporting on unsubstantiated claims.
Laughable. You barely know me and are labeling me as ignorant.
Last edited:
You have got to be kidding. They lie ALL the time.
About food stamps: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...ion-from-fox-news-on-food-stamp-fraud-report/
About linking anti trump protester to fraud: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...-anti-trump-protester-austyn-crites-to-voter?
They also constantly lie about Obama care, lie about statistics related to refugees and lie constantly about climate change. Not to mention all that propaganda; Obama is responsible for mass shootings? Really? Your partisanship has clouded your judgment.
You can't point to a single factual instance of them ever lying. You don't know me. I used to sit in a room full of large monitors. CNN, Fox, MsNbc, Cspan all playing side by side. Everyday for 4 + years. It became very clear who reported using facts and who reported speculation. I'm sorry but if you believe that you simply have no grip of reality.
Do yourself a favor and try your hardest to come off the coolaid. I'm telling you this with your best interest at heart.
I gave you links that show they lied. And you're still in denial.
Just tuned into the news to see a clip of one of those CNN "reporter"s giving Trump the "lip" whilst he was making his podium speech on the 11th.
I woulda got my security team to man handle him out and give him a good beat down for that.
Haha, I think Trump is deplorable, but deplorable or not, I'd support his right to put that bitch "reporter" in his place.
Fucking arguing with the next POTUS. If I was POTUS , the next flight that bitch got on would have blew up in flames
Fuckin punk!
I woulda got my security team to man handle him out and give him a good beat down for that.
Haha, I think Trump is deplorable, but deplorable or not, I'd support his right to put that bitch "reporter" in his place.
Fucking arguing with the next POTUS. If I was POTUS , the next flight that bitch got on would have blew up in flames
Fuckin punk!
It's difficult to take known liberal outlets seriously when they say an adversary of theirs has lied.
Going past that though, it's slightly disturbing you haven't figured that out yet.
Whats more disturbing is think any of these news organizations are completely innocent. Its quite apparent that Fox is like any other news organization; they've been caught out in lies. Yet you deny it completely.
Again Fox news being "caught" lying by other known liberal news agencies is hardly worth even raising an eyebrow over.
This should make sense to you. If it doesn't I would have to say you are deliberately being dense.
Lol here we go then. All examples of Fox news dishonest? Are you going to tell me they're all corrupt except Faux News?
http://www.salon.com/2016/11/04/the-fbi-isnt-indicting-hillary-clinton-over-the-clinton-foundation-but-fox-news-wants-you-to-think-it-is/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/fox-news-apologizes-for-falsely-reporting-that-clinton-faces-indictment/2016/11/04/8fd56f20-a2b7-11e6-8d63-3e0a660f1f04_story.html?tid=sm_tw
http://www.redstate.com/neil_stevens/2016/06/30/look-fox-cover-trump-losing-poll/
http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/15/media/wayne-simmons-tv-commentator-arrested/index.html
https://www.billoreilly.net/blog/20...ica.html?utm_source=social&utm_medium=twitter
http://gawker.com/slimy-baltimore-f..._source=gawker_facebook&utm_medium=socialflow
The only non liberal information here is from Red state. I have no idea what gawker is but it's not talking about Foxnews so it doesn't matter. As for Redstates observation, Fox news did not lie, they chose to report on a specific group of voters. Not a lie.
It's obvious what you want to be true but it's outside of reality. I won't be able to convince you of that I suspect but I am right none the less.
I said they were examples of Faux News being dishonest, not lying. Gawked IS talking about Faux News, are you blind? I'm starting to think you're conveniently not seeing certain details now.
Last edited:
"You have to be kidding, they lie all the time." - you. Previous post same thread. Go back and read because you clearly don't know what you have said or are saying.
Dude...
