Clinton vs Trump, Trump vs Clinton | Page 10 | INFJ Forum

Clinton vs Trump, Trump vs Clinton

Stu said:
She did not build a server, she used her husbands, Comey says in his statement that multiple servers were in service over a period of years encompassing her term in the Senate.
Judicial watch has a very interesting lawsuit that contends that the purpose was to avoid Freedom of Information requests.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ndard-in-clinton-case-as-comey-testifies.html

Of course reasonable people can argue otherwise, there are many different ways the facts of this case can be argued. I would suggest that only a moron would argue that no reasonable person could argue otherwise.
Click to expand...
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...n-the-greatest-president-of-the-20th-century/
Stu said:
She did not build a server, she used her husbands, Comey says in his statement that multiple servers were in service over a period of years encompassing her term in the Senate.
Judicial watch has a very interesting lawsuit that contends that the purpose was to avoid Freedom of Information requests.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ndard-in-clinton-case-as-comey-testifies.html

Of course reasonable people can argue otherwise, there are many different ways the facts of this case can be argued. I would suggest that only a moron would argue that no reasonable person could argue otherwise.
Click to expand...
Stu I believe you are becoming more liberal... in use of wordage like "stupid" and "moron" to describe me indirectly. I might take offense but its clear to me that you obviously do not understand the definition of either.
You are scrambling for justifications and the like as to why its ok for Clinton to do what she did and get away with it. And even if its only deep down you know you are full of it.
 
This is it. Dumb and dumber. America is so lucky...and lost.
 
I shall try to help from behind the scenes, no matter what happens. Feed my sheep.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandie33
I have watched a lot of republican nomination speeches and that was the most meandering piece of nonsense ever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brightmoon and Skarekrow
Stu said:
I have watched a lot of republican nomination speeches and that was the most meandering piece of nonsense ever.
Click to expand...
I did not watch it. What were the highlights for you?
 
only one.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skarekrow
uOU48BM.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wyote and Skarekrow
Stu said:
uOU48BM.png
Click to expand...
Complete BS. The FBI even admitted that had anyone else done what Clinton did they would be on trial. They said what she said in her questioning from the FBI was untrue.
There is no question that Clinton is a liar. None and yet you people have no issue with that.
Ok so you have a right to go through life and worship criminal activity if you like. Just acknowledge it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Siimplicity
Eventhorizon said:
Complete BS. The FBI even admitted that had anyone else done what Clinton did they would be on trial. They said what she said in her questioning from the FBI was untrue.
There is no question that Clinton is a liar. None and yet you people have no issue with that.
Ok so you have a right to go through life and worship criminal activity if you like. Just acknowledge it.
Click to expand...
It is fair to question the fact checkers, Politifact is run by the Tampa Bay Times and the fact checkers are thereby media people. If one holds the positions that professional journalists are by and large liberals than it can be argued that they are unable to overcome their bias.
Making the statement that "there is no question that Clinton is a liar" does not prove that she is a liar. What is a liar anyway? How do we decide how much untruth a person has to spread before we can level that charge? I carefully read the Comey presentation on the email scandal and he asserted that she did not lie to the investigators. You , sir, continue to state the opposite without attribution, I do not doubt you believe it but I also do not doubt you have to actual bases for the statement.

The point of the chart is to put the untruths spread by politicians into perspective. It is a tool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brightmoon and Skarekrow
Eventhorizon said:
Complete BS.
Click to expand...
Stu said:
It is fair to question the fact checkers, Politifact is run by the Tampa Bay Times and the fact checkers are thereby media people. If one holds the positions that professional journalists are by and large liberals than it can be argued that they are unable to overcome their bias.
Making the statement that "there is no question that Clinton is a liar" does not prove that she is a liar. What is a liar anyway? How do we decide how much untruth a person has to spread before we can level that charge? I carefully read the Comey presentation on the email scandal and he asserted that she did not lie to the investigators. You , sir, continue to state the opposite without attribution, I do not doubt you believe it but I also do not doubt you have to actual bases for the statement.

The point of the chart is to put the untruths spread by politicians into perspective. It is a tool.
Click to expand...
No his statement said that what she said was untrue. He never said she lied just that what she said was untrue. You and I both know she is a liar. The whole country knows it.
 
Reagan-Mondale-debate-There-you-go-again-again.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skarekrow
  • Like
Reactions: Skarekrow and Eventhorizon
Yeah issues....
The problem is its not about issues. Its about getting elected. Issues are just fodder for some.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Siimplicity
At the moment, the likeliest outcome seems like a Democratic gain of five to 20 seats (the Cook Political Report rates 22 GOP-held seats as Toss Up, Lean Democratic or Likely Democratic, compared with four Democratic seats in Toss Up, Lean Republican and Likely Republican). In other words, the first few GOP targets are very winnable for Democrats, but the last few needed for a majority would require a wave.

However, don’t underestimate the effect that Democrats cutting the GOP majority in half might have. It could have big consequences for governing. Back in October, we predicted that Paul Ryan wouldn’t have it any easier than John Boehner did when it comes to fundamental spending and debt votes, thanks to rebellions from the very conservative House Freedom Caucus.

If Ryan were to lose half his 30-seat majority, he could be the last backstop against a Democratic White House and Senate. But Ryan would also likely be forced to reach across the aisle for Democratic votes even more often than Boehner did, giving the minority more leverage and possibly branding him as the GOP’s RINO-in-chief for good.
Click to expand...
 
Look up Mena, Arkansas and Clinton in YouTube or Google and tell me if you would vote Clinton. How about "Epstein Clinton"?
 
When I see this clip, where Hillary is accused of staging a full arena,


I cannot help but to think of Wag the Dog.


What about Trump is he also faking crowds? I know that he is faking his competence of being a successful businessman. His financial success is based on fraudulent corporate adventures.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandie33 and Skarekrow
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back